create a tee and develop it

[roccolaser]

hi guys I have to make a stainless steel tee and then cut it laser, I did the piece but I wanted a tip how to make the cut extruded both in the long piece and in the small piece, I hope I made you understand I attach the file...:biggrin:

 

[Mike1967]

hi guys I have to make a stainless steel tee and then cut it laser, I did the piece but I wanted a tip how to make the cut extruded both in the long piece and in the small piece, I hope I made you understand I attach the file...:biggrin:

We take the epoeia back... :biggrin:

I rotated by 90° the tube joint long.
I didn't check the K factor, I assume you already set it up.

 

[roccolaser]

great mike, but I still have to understand what you did but I see it slowly, but 3d sketch to what you served? one thing I wanted to tell you the factor k I didn't change it now as soon as I change it a triangle appears in the extrusions, and then if the big piece I have to turn it 180 degrees as I do?

 

[Mike1967]

great mike, but I still have to understand what you did but I see it slowly, but 3d sketch to what you served? one thing I wanted to tell you the factor k I didn't change it now as soon as I change it a triangle appears in the extrusions, and then if the big piece I have to turn it 180 degrees as I do?

3d sketch is nothing but the product of the function "intersection curve" and I used it as a reference to trace the sketch of the 2 extruded cuts.
turn the pz... is not that the "turn", I only rotated the arc of 90° regarding the original... to learn, open the two files (my and your) and close the windows
analyze all the steps and you will realize.

ti uppo the file again, I fixed the sketch of the short tube, learns to make sketches completely defined and in cases like these, respects the symmetricity of the object. You'll notice by viewing the sketches that generate the pipes.
in fact now the error of the fk is no longer: the file is totally parametric.

 

[roccolaser]

then if I now have to turn the big piece to make sure that the welding comes to me on the opposite side what do I have to rotate? I tried to do it. Look at the triangle that comes out. .

 

[Mike1967]

then if I now have to turn the big piece to make sure that the welding comes to me on the opposite side what do I have to rotate? I tried to do it. Look at the triangle that comes out. .

hheee... No. Get used to it!
When you change your construction geometry so heavily, you have errors.
have lost, or overdefinite, relationships of the sketch.
open the sketch of cuts and system, helping you with "show/elimina relationships", bad relationships.
the problem arises from the intersection curve that is recreated with another entity than the original extrusion.
observation: the sketch you have modified is not fully defined (see guide) which means you don't take into account what you are told.

 

[roccolaser]

cia mike on display/elimina relationships can't understand where the error is, even then never did you can direct me a help where I can understand?

 

[Mike1967]

rocco... makes the oecc bullet. . .
almen a zikk. . . .

 

[CIARLY]

hheee... No. Get used to it!
When you change your construction geometry so heavily, you have errors.
have lost, or overdefinite, relationships of the sketch.
open the sketch of cuts and system, helping you with "show/elimina relationships", bad relationships.
the problem arises from the intersection curve that is recreated with another entity than the original extrusion.
observation: the sketch you have modified is not fully defined (see guide) which means you don't take into account what you are told.

Hi.
I take the opportunity to suggest if it was not the case of opening a discussion to be left in relief on the basic notions of solidworks.
es the defined sketches, multibody parts, the ability to save in previous versions, file references, just to say some.
are notions that should be learned before learning soloworks and would be useful for new members coming fasts avoiding so many repetitive questions.
I have not done complete courses and I cannot say if these topics are dealt with or not, I think they have to be the basis, the program is between simple quotes you have to start well and know these things is essential, then for the various functions everyone learns what they need.

the discussion should be tightened and only concerning these basics, if you raise too nobody will read it, like the regulation.

 

[Ivan1990]

ballà l'oecc. . .

You are also part of the party fbl:biggrin:

 

[Mike1967]

Hi.
I take the opportunity to suggest if it was not the case of opening a discussion to be left in relief on the basic notions of solidworks.
es the defined sketches, multibody parts, the ability to save in previous versions, file references, just to say some.
are notions that should be learned before learning soloworks and would be useful for new members coming fasts avoiding so many repetitive questions.
I have not done complete courses and I cannot say if these topics are dealt with or not, I think they have to be the basis, the program is between simple quotes you have to start well and know these things is essential, then for the various functions everyone learns what they need.

the discussion should be tightened and only concerning these basics, if you raise too nobody will read it, like the regulation.

really exists already, it is called "Solidworks online guide" and is located under the drop-down menu under the heading "?".
You know, reading the guide is denigratory: "What will be written that I can't guess alone"... a me non mi You need to.. .
Moreover the database of the ns forum is very wide and if only you learn to use the "research" button you will find many answers already posted in the span of years.
I assume that a user who presents himself in a "technical" forum has a preparation and professionalism (it is not my case) that fits a technician, precisely.
then if there is some pious soul that wants... contribute will be a pleasure.

 

[roccolaser]

Hey, guys, and since this morning I've been banging our heads but I can't, can any of you show me a video of how to fix this error? If I see it once I learn immediately, I have made several attempts but nothing..

 

[roccolaser]

hello take a look at this piece the cut of intersection seems right to you?

 

[roccolaser]

ok mike maybe I managed it you can only look for the safety that is right, thank you so much I attach it...:finger:

 

[Mike1967]

ok mike maybe I managed it you can only look for the safety that is right, thank you so much I attach it...:finger:

Total sketches defined... And I don't tell you anymore.
download the file, there is a video.

Bye.

video

 

[roccolaser]

thanks to your video I solved the problem and I think I understand, how do the totalmete sketches defined... .

 

[Mike1967]

Very well!

 

[Mike1967]

ok mike maybe I managed it you can only look for the safety that is right, thank you so much I attach it...:finger:

hummm... Now let's make it look like this....
so let's see if you understood the purpose of the various steps.
:smile:

 

[roccolaser]

mike compared to that changes that in the large pipe the spacing is located at the center of the small tube?

 

[roccolaser]

I was starting to draw from the home computer, and something strange happens to me in building the sketch, which in the company does not happen to me, when I throw the central line to make the spacing as soon as I give it the 0.1 angle the central line moves left, how come this happens?