coincidence bond; axis/axis

[piccio__87]

Hello!

problem!

constraint between 2 holes with coincidence-->
1)axis with axis (I remain free movement along the axis between the two holes)

2)point of the hole (center) and axis of the other hole (I remain free the "spheroidal" movement coincides with the axis but in coincidence of the hole point without possibility of translating it as in the first case)

If you want to give a point-translation tolerance on the other hole axis so that you can translate it???????? is there a command that escapes me?

Oh, my God, I hope I've explained... :

Now I have to run away, tomorrow I have pictures to explain better if you don't understand.. .

 

[meccanicamg]

I don't understand. I think it takes pictures.
but using the traditional bond system that is always used is not good? coinciding hole/hole and then coinciding (possible distance) floor/floor?

I do not have the possibility to try it on inventor, but if you do circle center on hole axis, as from classical geometry rules a point belonging to a line can rotate in all directions and translate along the axis of belonging.

see tomorrow with pictures

 

[Tarkus]

I don't understand. I think it takes pictures.
but using the traditional bond system that is always used is not good? coinciding hole/hole and then coinciding (possible distance) floor/floor?

I do not have the possibility to try it on inventor, but if you do circle center on hole axis, as from classical geometry rules a point belonging to a line can rotate in all directions and translate along the axis of belonging.

see tomorrow with pictures

That's right, you gave me the word of mouth:

 

[piccio__87]

Thank you.
I solved. .
I only realized this morning that I asked for a baggianata... I was a little baked yesterday... :
I have a little mess in the constraints on the assembly and I didn't think that the non-translation of a point on the axis was related to anything else.. .

Sorry, and thank you again.

 

[briele2]

I'm banging, I joined 2 levers, I have to place the second lever on a particular degree, incredible but I don't know how to rotate 17 degrees a lever than an axis

 

[Tarkus]

I'm banging, I joined 2 levers, I have to place the second lever on a particular degree, incredible but I don't know how to rotate 17 degrees a lever than an axis

You sure have the two levers on the same rotation axis, and so far, I guess we agree.
Then, the two levers may have two flat faces, so use the bond of angularity between the two faces by choosing the "directed vine" option and insert your degrees.
if they don't have flat faces, create a work plan on the part or use native plans and constraints to them.

p.s.
Sometimes it's a little weird, if you tell him 17th he might turn you 90-17°, but as soon as you see how he behaves, you know how to "fregate him." .:biggrin:

 

[briele2]

I can't turn a lever, incredible how complex inventor is

I have a lever to turn it 90 ° or a degree to please I have to put an axis ? I have to use the constraints ? bah...with autocad 3d these problems do not exist

 

[Tarkus]

I can't turn a lever, incredible how complex inventor is

I have a lever to turn it 90 ° or a degree to please I have to put an axis ? I have to use the constraints ? bah...with autocad 3d these problems do not exist

you can always return to autocad and good work... .

 

[MauroM]

... amazing how complex inventor is

I also thought of it as you before learning to use it:tongue:

 

[briele2]

I also thought of it as you before learning to use it:tongue:

Just like learning a different language, let's say Chinese, of course you want

 

[Tarkus]

It is not a problem of Chinese or Indopachystan, but simply to enlarge the horizons.
with a parametric modeler like inventor or others, you can do things that you don't even dream with autocad.
If then your work is limited to levering, then it's clear that using inventor, it's like using the trivella for highway tunnels, to do the well to water the garden...:biggrin: