i can't get this geometry

[opua]

Hello everyone, I’m trying to do an operation with v5 cat that I generally perform with pro-e and ug, the geometry I want to get is pressed that exemplified in the images below.
It is four curves (each with different angles and lengths) that must flow on a guide profile. I thought that this result in catia could be obtained with the sweep command or multi section surface but, I failed to achieve result. .
Can anyone help me?
Thank you very much in advance

 

[ferrezio]

Hello everyone, I’m trying to do an operation with v5 cat that I generally perform with pro-e and ug, the geometry I want to get is pressed that exemplified in the images below.
It is four curves (each with different angles and lengths) that must flow on a guide profile. I thought that this result in catia could be obtained with the sweep command or multi section surface but, I failed to achieve result. .
Can anyone help me?
Thank you very much in advance

see if the attached examples do to your case

Hi.

 

[cesius79]

see if the attached examples do to your case

Hi.

Hi.
I use nx and I think I have understood what it means... it would work to achieve with caia qullo that in nx is obtained with "sliding surfaces". I'm good at it.

 

[opua]

exact, I intended to create a blend sweep, that is, the profile flows on the four curves having each a different angle and length. using the multisection function the surface fails to close the last stretch. . .

 

[ferrezio]

the solution and sweep with law that is the first of the three found in the model.
If you want to use the adaptive sweep you have to reason with open profiles.

if the particular is a solid then reason with the variable sform.

Hi.

 

[opua]

hi ferrezio, place another image: in this case the surface is obtained with only one feature in ug through three spline profiles (and therefore all different). It is therefore not possible to use an extrusion with sform...by the sweep command, could you tell me how to achieve it in the casket?

 

[alpole]

opto
I strongly agree with what he says.
but using some craftsmen
You can screw up a lot with what you're asking. .
Take a look... .
I could have done everything clean:
start with a closed profile made with more spline in a sketch
and publish them, instead of using the profile already designed
and approximate it... but the sense and that
offest variable and then normal offset from good results
of reconstruction... on polysuperfici
to the

 

[alpole]

opto
This, perhaps, is an example a little more
Clear of what I wanted to illustrate
starting from your inputs, I build a polysurf
by means of a multisection surf composition;
I close a top with a patch;
I'll compose everything again, and then, via simplified offset,
with a small craftsman(the ophsset is repeated in the sense
contrary to the first performed ) I get a surf that you
significantly approaches the initial polysurf obtained
with profiles. .
to the

 

[opua]

hi alpole and thank you for your answers, the models you have attached can not open them, I have version 18 and 19 of catia.