orthogonal projections

[reye]

hello to all, I have a little doubt about the orthogonal projection of the attached piece. in the views represented by me, how to highlight the nascorsti edges relative to the empty area placed above? Thank you.

 

[meccanicamg]

if it is empty, then in the asola above there is nothing. then in the right view there will be the restraints of the inner edges of the asola as you did

 

[PierArg]

Bye to all,
You could also do a localized section, obviously in the right view.

but it usually serves if you want to show bevels or rays along the perimeter of the asola.

 

[reye]

So you think those restraints are okay? I was undecided whether to put them or not

 

[luigi.paiano]

Why don't you do a section instead of the view?it's more elegant to me

 

[luigi.paiano]

Something like this... Forgive me for any mistakes but I did it in 2 minutes.
clearly you will indicate in quotation the fact that the holes are passing.
p.s. sorry but I attached you the wrong section, you have to do the opposite (from the right)

 

[Enigma]

if it is empty it is empty

parole sante...:finger:

agree

 

[PierArg]

...you could also do a localized section, obviously in the right view.

...

Something like this... Forgive me for any mistakes but I did it in 2 minutes.
clearly you will indicate in quotation the fact that the holes are passing.
p.s. sorry but I attached you the wrong section, you have to do the opposite (from the right)

That's exactly what I meant:

 

[reye]

explanation and clear design. Yes, of course the section if it is empty is empty, but the hidden edges must however indicate them it is not clear to me the line placed in the section at the side hole

 

[luigi.paiano]

explanation and clear design. Yes, of course the section if it is empty is empty, but the hidden edges must however indicate them it is not clear to me the line placed in the section at the side hole

Leave it alone, catholics..I recommend you do the other section

 

[reye]

Okay thank you how about this that I think is a linear guide?

 

[luigi.paiano]

I'm fine.
you can remove the dotted lines so much you did the section

 

[Mauri:66]

system the position of the section view.

 

[reye]

yes yes yes nek drawing is not seen but there was an arrow indicating the exact position of the view. So can I take the dotted lines?

 

[giovanni.a]

yes yes yes nek drawing is not seen but there was an arrow indicating the exact position of the view. So can I take the dotted lines?

I think you can leave them, because they indicate that the cuts are passing.
You have to remove the last one on the right because there is no edge.

 

[reye]

(Translated with Google Translate)

 

[reye]

last post do not want to take advantage of your time: on these two views there are errors of axes or edges?

 

[reye]

I forgot to erase the axes of the semicircumferences that if I do not err are wrong. in this regard I ask whether the symmetry axis of the cylinder on the right and those of the semicirconferences views of the shortcut

 

[PierArg]

I forgot to erase the axes of the semicirculations that if not erro are wrong.. .

No, it is not wrong to put the axes on the semicirculations. :finger:

 

[Mauri:66]

Keep burning.