bradipo666
Guest
hi guys asked me if in the last release it was possible to open a file generated with 2014, inside of 2013! thank you!
Ilario
Guest
I haven't tried 2014 files yet, but as always I think I'm not!
bradipo666
Guest
but what break though
today I installed in test autocad 2014 and I noticed that generating a design then you can save it not in acad 2014 but from 2013 in ju... I hoped something had changed in inventor ..Tarkus
Guest
always been so, with autocad you can save in previous versions, with solid modelers no!
bradipo666
Guest
Threesome:
ps: with autocad 2014 you can save from 2013 down (you can't save in 2014) strange is what! I will put my soul in peace.. Thank you.
ps: with autocad 2014 you can save from 2013 down (you can't save in 2014) strange is what! I will put my soul in peace.. Thank you.
arzigogolo
Guest
Well, actually, there's a road: download this application from autodesklabs autodesclab and should allow you to recognize the machining tree from a step file or in neutral format. if you do it with other programs like solidworks in inventor, most of all you should do it from one version of inventor to another.
so I would do so: save your ipt in inventor 2014 in step format and then import it into inventor 2013 with this application.
I did not try personally, but try not harm!:smile:
ooops.. I saw that the 2013 version of this software expired in April, so you have to wait for them to make available the 2014 version for download.. I think we have to wait! :frown:
carlett
Guest
autocad changes version of .dwg every 3 years
you will notice that between options you can save in autocad 2013, 2010, 2007, 2004
.
importing a step is not the same as opening a .ipt, but there are no big alternatives if you want to open a model made with inventor 2014 on 2013 (or open an ipt 2013 with 2012 etc etc.)
Tarkus
Guest
Uh,
If we talk about "feature recognition" I have the impression that it is more time lost than anything.
After a few times I used it, I gave up, it seems to me that it makes a big mess.
arzigogolo
Guest
Mah, I don't know what to say if he gave you these problems, maybe it was an unstable version or actually it was wrong.Uh,
If we talk about "feature recognition" I have the impression that it is more time lost than anything.
After a few times I used it, I gave up, it seems to me that it makes a big mess.
I read this discussion http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthre...one-tra-solidworks-2012-e-inventor-2013/page2and in the last post, it seems that the user brethil found himself well, but not having tried it I can not say anything.
I would also try the 2014 version when they release it, it is likely that they have improved it.
in this video seems to work great http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6dmx62z650If it works properly, it should be a great thing, because it is the only application for inventor that allows you to import files from other programs by recognizing the tree of the processing (in theory!:36_6_6
.Tarkus
Guest
bho, really brerthil reports to close the post:
"or I make all the changes to those who sent me the project and cut my head to the bull...
♪
I don't know how well it was.... .
"or I make all the changes to those who sent me the project and cut my head to the bull...
♪
I don't know how well it was.... .
Mauritz
Guest
I don't understand this, but why do they have this policy?! It is unthinkable that I every time I wait for inventor to become crazy and then open it on other pcs. amazing.
carlett
Guest
It doesn't work so just for inventor.
I installed solidworks 2013 and 2012, a sw2013 file does not open with sw2012.
today I installed inventor 2014 and confirm that 2013 does not open .ipt of inventor 2014.
in the past I used catia, v5r17 did not open r18, which did not open r19, r20, r21 etc etc etc.
arzigogolo
Guest
I read the post number 12 where it says:
" hi, I found it and downloaded, my impresison is that it is a real pussy, detects 90% of the features and the related sketches (or at least the ones I was interested in modifying) and allows for complete modification. ok will also be an extension in phase of testing, but they have just tested well...at least, as first impression.
He solved a lot of trouble, and I hope I'll be useful in the future.
thanks for the right
♪
the phrase you bring, should be in post number 1 of brethil, the one I reported above, is on page n°2 at closing. is not that you reversed the posts?:smile:
Tarkus
Guest
Yeah, sorry, you're right. I read the first page. Still blessed him, to me the feature recognition has pulled out a lot of work, unless those that were served to make the piece....
stefanobruno
Guest
I didn't know what the continuous autocad call came in.
in any case, all the old 3d do not read the new 3d and, unless the implementation of a new philosophy not based on the gain of the houses producing sw, so it will be until the end of time.
unless 2 : the recogniser of the work becomes what his name promises and, for the moment, does not maintain.
in any case, all the old 3d do not read the new 3d and, unless the implementation of a new philosophy not based on the gain of the houses producing sw, so it will be until the end of time.
unless 2 : the recogniser of the work becomes what his name promises and, for the moment, does not maintain.
Ilario
Guest
It's not incredible, it's perfectly normal.
I'll give you an example:
until the 2010 version (I don't remember if it is actually that version, but it's just as an example) to make a frame-tondo trap in sheet metal it was necessary to go crazy creating sketches and subdividing circles in improbable polygons opening geometries with absurd systems.... from 2011 onwards appeared the commands "tramoggia" and "separation" that with two simple sketches and two browser features solved the problem.
Another example, until 2012 to make an asymmetric extrusion it was necessary to create an extrusion on one side of a measuring tot and then a second extrusion on the opposite side of different size. from 2013 onwards a single extrusion processing allows to extrude on two sides with different quotas one from the other.
Now, knowing this, how could the previous version interpret something that does not exist? Does it still seem so absurd?
different thing for autocad that is nothing but a vector modeler. the only difference that you can have from version to version will be the interpretation of vectors. bad that go the previous versions will have to do nothing but "explode" things that do not recognize or not display them (as in fact happens).
If a parametric "excludes" some kind of work that might be in the middle of the feature tree, I see it hard to interpret the rest of the tree.... ;-)
arzigogolo
Guest
Lol, this is called a loser!:hahahahah:
we hope that in 2014 you will also pull out those who serve, always that those good men of the autodesk give a move and do not make us wait for the greched calends!
in parentheses, these days I'm trying inventor 2014 and I have to say that how speed of graphic processing really did a good job.
I have a 6000-part axieme and with orbital command it turns smoothly and smoothly. nothing to do with 2012 or 2013.
Have you tried it yet?
Tarkus
Guest
I'm trying now, but only on the parts.
beautiful and well done command to trace the sunbeds.
It was time they put it! :36_1_16:
beautiful and well done command to trace the sunbeds.
It was time they put it! :36_1_16:
arzigogolo
Guest
also the bond of symmetry is very useful.
I tried it in the environment together and I have to say it works well.
In practice it seems to me a little like the mirror command with the difference that the parts maintain the same distance from the symmetry plane even if they are moved by hand or with a constraint.
Unfortunately the command "specchia part" remained equal. It mirrors the part, but once it's done, it's released!
but it takes so much to do the command so that beyond the part you mirror also the constraints?:36_1_28:
bradipo666
Guest
Yes, it's right what you say though you want to get the chance to open the file and maybe see each other recognize (I don't say all) but a good part of the work without having to do it again? ?
that then, from 2010 to 2014 is not that there were all these changes at feature level. .
ps: do you give me a link where you can download "inventor feature recognition" ? thanks :biggrin: