render con autocad

[vale88]

Hello, everyone! I hope I posted this message in the right section.
I would need a huge tip: I realized the 3d of a swimming pool in autocad, complete with furniture of the garden and neighboring dwelling and I would like to make it a render, but they are not very practical and also I would like to avoid "disprecating" too much time to learn another program.
So I ask you: Is it possible to make a render with autocad or would you recommend another program?
I tried to import the 3d in sketchup with the trial version, because they told me to be a very easy program, but I couldn't. :frown:

Thank you very much for your answer! !

 

[Tristan]

Of course it is feasible, but if you are fast rendering, materials, lights etc... you have to study a lot whether you talk about autocad or any other software

 

[sircame]

So I ask you: Is it possible to make a render with autocad or would you recommend another program?
I tried to import the 3d in sketchup with the trial version, because they told me to be a very easy program, but I couldn't.

sketchup is an excellent solid modeler (optimum for 300€) but does not play the part of rendering, if it is what you mean, they, with sketchups once you make the model you have to export it in a rendering engine, which can be kerkythea (free) or thea (the sucessor of kerkythea but at payment) or to others. there are plugins that render within sketchups, but the result is not at all satisfactory. . .

If you're in the first place, I recommend you kerkythea. find so much documentation on the official forum and also many textures divided by topic.

 

[mioipe]

autocad2014

 

[Tristan]

autocad2014https://imageshack.com/i/f6ougpj

working well on materials and lighting you get wanting a better quality

 

[mioipe]

working well on materials and lighting you get wanting a better quality

I don't understand who the reply is.

 

[PlannerRoad]

I don't understand who the reply is.

to you, he also quoted you tristan.

 

[Tristan]

I don't understand who the reply is.

It's addressed to you. I meant that with those renderings you don't do a good autocad advertising.

 

[mioipe]

working well on materials and lighting you get wanting a better quality

of course, but unfortunately the time available is almost never enough.
If you have your autocad jobs to show I would be really curious.
greetings

 

[mioipe]

It's addressed to you. I meant that with those renderings you don't do a good autocad advertising.

tu all'educazione, non me ne volere!

 

[Tristan]

you to education, I don't want to!

What did I say? Just because I don't like your renderings I'd be rude?

 

[GP.]

working well on materials and lighting you get wanting a better quality

and' vero.

I meant that with those renderings you don't do a good autocad advertising.

Well, that's a little strong. .
Miipe is a student, I have seen portfolios of technicians from the big arias that in comparison almost shit.

you to education, I don't want to!

Do not take it, Tristan is a "very direct", accepts its criticism and advice, you will see that in a few years you will see it differently... :smile:

 

[Tristan]

I have seen portfolios of technicians from the big arias that in comparison almost shit.

for those who do not see the forums of all colors. Recently, however, I have noticed with pleasure that the stem has risen. you see less and less "cagate" and more and more good renderings (deserved perhaps of greater simplicity of use and the most performing hardware)

 

[gil]

Surely there are wide margins of improvement, however to me the renders of myopic seem discreet.

 

[MBT]

Surely there are wide margins of improvement, however to me the renders of myopic seem discreet.

I think so.
I have seen better, no doubt
however to me (which I can not render) seem discreet

 

[Tristan]

I didn't say they suck, I just said that I don't like them... but it's undeniable that they're zeros of defects (due to lack of time or inexperience, I don't know). Myoipe has posted his work on this discussion I do not know what pro or if he wanted to prove something; If I were the user who opened the topic I would be discouraged by using autocad to render if these are the results. I didn't want to offend anyone

 

[mioipe]

I thought it was obvious and instead... so:
I believe that a visual evaluation can give a real idea from which to start, then you can make a negative assessment, like that of someone, as passable to others, is to you who asked for help, to evaluate how to proceed since you know what you want to get.
I have to admit that I never thought I would risk even "discover" someone in using any software because of me.
If there is someone who after this type of "non-offensive" evaluation for his work would feel "uneasy" well I welcome him in my world.

greetings to all
In the meantime, I'm working on this that gives me perspective problems on the outside lights.