programma per esplosi

[Filo]

What do you use to make explosives?

doing it with inventor is painful, I tried to use publisher but it's probably even worse.

other tips?

Hi.

Thank you.
thread

 

[Ilario]

with inventor... How?
I always found myself quite well with the .ipn...

 

[Filo]

Yes, with inventor ipn. I think it's too sluggish and we have to do everything by hand because if you explode automatically a disaster happens.

Hi.
Thank you.

 

[Tristan]

You have to do everything by hand because if you explode automatically a disaster happens.

If you do perfectly automatically what you ask in your place there would be an oriental paid 1€/h to press a button.

 

[Filo]

If you do perfectly automatically what you ask in your place there would be an oriental paid 1€/h to press a button.

so I could devote myself to more interesting things and books would be updated in decent times :smile:

 

[ninfh]

to be able to use the expulsion automatically you must have put the constraints with the "right" order and sincerely it is not a really feasible thing, but if you try to do some tests to see how the expulsion command works automatically according to the order and type of constraints, often you can use it with discrete results and you have to reposition only a few pieces (always if you do not need to show an animation of montage only.

 

[Ilario]

If you do perfectly automatically what you ask in your place there would be an oriental paid 1€/h to press a button.

I wanted to say it, but I didn't know if it was the case.

apart from everything, I don't think there is a program that explodes everything automatically, even because it's all very relative: the view, the importance of details depending on the machine, the location, the sheet on which you will go to put the exploded etc... it certainly takes a person dedicated to that... otherwise do as everyone does, do what you can

 

[Ilario]

to be able to use the expulsion automatically you must have put the constraints with the "right" order and sincerely it is not a really feasible thing, but if you try to do some tests to see how the expulsion command works automatically according to the order and type of constraints, often you can use it with discrete results and you have to reposition only a few pieces (always if you do not need to show an animation of montage only.

As you put the constraints there is nothing to do with the hypn, the automatic explosive puts you "percours" at a distance "x" exploding the parts, but most times does not help much. You have to do it by hand for the reasons I mentioned before... I speak for direct experience.

 

[MBT]

so I could devote myself to more interesting things and books would be updated in decent times :smile:

next step, a button that makes the table automatically, with the right odds, tolerances and roughness!
so I can devote myself to watching porn and being paid the same.... ;-)

 

[ninfh]

as you put the constraints there is nothing to do with the hypn

I ask vein, but how the constraints are placed is vital if you want to use automatic exposion.

a very simple example, we take a tree with two steps to seeger at the extremes, we insert the two rings with two constraints each, the first will be the axis the second face of the dig, the face that we go to choose will determine the dierection in which the piece will be moved using the automatic explosion.

 

[ninfh]

first example with both components bound on the internal face second example with a binding component on the inner face and one on the external face

 

[Ilario]

I apologize.... I didn't know! !
I used the automatic explosion a few times... But I prefer to constrain thinking of the "robustness" of the axieme that to the future "explosion"... but interesting, you never stop learning things;-)

 

[LunGab]

Yes, with inventor ipn. I think it's too sluggish and we have to do everything by hand because if you explode automatically a disaster happens.

Hi.
Thank you.

the automatic explosion on solidworks works well but the result and always not satisfying even on simple assemblies.

 

[LunGab]

I apologize.... I didn't know! !
I used the automatic explosion a few times... But I prefer to constrain thinking of the "robustness" of the axieme that to the future "explosion"... but interesting, you never stop learning things;-)

Drawers commonly speaking do not draw or design thinking about the explosive. the automatic explosion accordingly if thought with the above criteria will normally not be usable.
according to me the useful function to realize an explosive view quickly and beautiful could be the following:
1) select the explosion axis and direction;
2) select the first group of elements (one or more elements) to be submitted to the first explosion translation;
3) set the value of the translation distance in mm;
4) select the second group of elements (one or more elements) to be subject to the second explosion translation;
5) set the value of the translation distance in mm. the first group will also move for this distance along with the second group;
6) repeat until each element has exploded.
7) perform this function again for other items on another axis.

 

[LunGab]

What do you use to make explosives?

doing it with inventor is painful, I tried to use publisher but it's probably even worse.

other tips?

Hi.

Thank you.
thread

solidworks has a expensive program like solidworks professional that is called composer.
It does much more than the explosions. seen two full demos over 10 years, I don't like it, I find it more uncomfortable than the explosive views of solidworks. if the axieme is made with solidworks.
the composer voucher is that it opens 3d files of almost all sources. also autodesk, solidedge, etc.

 

[TETRASTORE]

to obtain results that are inexclusible both in the graphic and document profile there are dedicated software very versatile that import cad3d files and allow with appropriate automation to obtain documents in relatively short time.
I, when I realized the documentation for my clients, had a supplier who processed the 3d models that had been supplied to me and delivered the explosives that I entered in the final document, or provided the interactive svg that through a dedicated software allowed to manage the spare parts. for this he used corel designer; see examples qui e qui.
It is obvious that this activity, if not outsourced, presupposes the presence in a person's company, designer or not with a minimum of graphic skills and desktop publishing, which is dedicated to the preparation of the documentation.