inventor 2015, old and new grains (especially old)

[d-prom]

Good evening.
I tried to "play" a bit with inventor 2015 and noticed that some problems already existing on the old versions still remain on this. It is a matter of problems I have already mentioned. one is more than another a limit of the program: the fact that it does not allow to perform threads on the assemblies as they can perform on the parts (if it was spoken qui).
as it is a limit of the program the problem I had raised qui, as well as This is e This is.
another thing that puts inventor in flaw compared to the competition is that during the quotation of the masses on the table does not recognize the holes, threaded and not. I explain: if I on the model carry out a hole, for example, ø13, with other cads in the table I will go to quota the hole in section asking the distance between the two lines representing the hole and the program will automatically add the sign ø, or the indication of the thread if it is a threaded hole (e.g. if the hole is 1/4"g will write me 1/4"g and not 13. inventor, however, brutally indicates the distance between the lines, and I must be the one to intervene to have the correct share.
then there is This is that is not a limit but a real kiss that most likely inventor drags behind since his birth (from 5 or 6 versions of certain) and that no one has so far moved a finger to solve.
One thing I find meaningless is that welds cannot be inserted in multibody parts (always contrary to what happens in other software). What does the multibody use if not welded?
hopefully in 2016...

 

[d-prom]

If you noticed, I did not mention the names of the various software with which I compared inventor: the thing is absolutely desired, because the purpose of the discussion that I opened is certainly not to shoot at zero on inventor or to advertise other cads, but only to tell my about where inventor could be improved.

 

[Tarkus]

If you noticed, I did not mention the names of the various software with which I compared inventor: the thing is absolutely desired, because the purpose of the discussion that I opened is certainly not to shoot at zero on inventor or to advertise other cads, but only to tell my about where inventor could be improved.

talking about it and dealing with each other is certainly useful and constructive.
hope that autodesk will see this forum, read what we are discussing and rule accordingly, is a pious illusion,
I refer you to this old discussion:http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?62-lista-aggiornamenti-desideratias you see, since then no one has added word.
inventor is one of the most sold software despite these and other gaps, thanks to the fact that they converge on this software sooner or later an infinity of autocad users (including me).
Perhaps this is also a reason why inventor developers make themselves a lot of mental saws and do not deal seriously with user problems.
in high words they sleep on the laurels and we have nothing but to understand whether it is a suitable software for our work or to go towards other solutions.