Lettore espatriato
Guest
Good morning.
When I talk about 2400 hours, I'm talking about the fact that professionals, with whom I worked, did not compare with the employee to establish how many hours to do this or that month. They simply did a job in the shortest possible time (intensive as a delivery deadline) and then switch to the next one, obviously trying to leave less time between one and the other (which I imagine is what every free professional does). The more hours you do, and besides earning more, the more hours you're gonna spend your money.
But, in my view, what you're losing sight of is that what really affects the hourly cost is the shopping choices. and I don't talk about the cad or hardware that could also be imposed or supplied by the customer.
I'm talking about other expenses.
we assume that we have also done "only" the 1700 hours/year.
Let's assume we have to buy the car with which to work and bring the family around.
There are at least two possible choices: one (that which, for example, has praised hunter) to take a new category car (but could have been half-yearly for example) , which does not cost a heritage, which consumes as little as possible, and keep it for at least 6 years.
If, on the other hand, it has spent 15000 euros, it means that, on its hourly cost, spread over 6 years, the car will affect approximately 1.5 euros/hour.
the other choice, although respectable (and view to do so many free professionals), is: for n reasons, the choice of the machine that I will use is the German sw 4wd, 250 cv , etc.. which costs 50000 euros. and, of course, every three years changes it because it's not safe anymore, etc... getting a little, that's 10000 euros, because it's 200000 km, nobody wants it.
to this second free professional, only the cost of the machine, will affect ' 40000 euros (50000 less the 10000 obtained) , and, "spalmati" on 3 years, will be , approximately 7.5 euros/hour.
a difference of 6 euro/hour, without even having talked about home, telephone, office, chairs, magazines, courses, furniture, schools for children, boat, glider, holidays, etc...
then the software and the hardware . for which:
1) most times the choice of one or another is not a free choice, but an imposition of the market (by sector) or the customer.
2) Considering amortization of 3 years, and a purchase cost of 10000 euros + hardware 5000 + software fee/assistance 2500, the incidence comes to be 3.5 euros per hour.
at the end of the accounts, for one of the two professionals, it will be possible to make 30 euros / hour and earn decently. for the other, it will be impossible to do less than 70 euros per hour and, at the time when he loses a contract because another offered 55 euros per hour, then if he takes it with taxes, with the employees, with the unfair competitors, with the software house, with the world.
When I talk about 2400 hours, I'm talking about the fact that professionals, with whom I worked, did not compare with the employee to establish how many hours to do this or that month. They simply did a job in the shortest possible time (intensive as a delivery deadline) and then switch to the next one, obviously trying to leave less time between one and the other (which I imagine is what every free professional does). The more hours you do, and besides earning more, the more hours you're gonna spend your money.
But, in my view, what you're losing sight of is that what really affects the hourly cost is the shopping choices. and I don't talk about the cad or hardware that could also be imposed or supplied by the customer.
I'm talking about other expenses.
we assume that we have also done "only" the 1700 hours/year.
Let's assume we have to buy the car with which to work and bring the family around.
There are at least two possible choices: one (that which, for example, has praised hunter) to take a new category car (but could have been half-yearly for example) , which does not cost a heritage, which consumes as little as possible, and keep it for at least 6 years.
If, on the other hand, it has spent 15000 euros, it means that, on its hourly cost, spread over 6 years, the car will affect approximately 1.5 euros/hour.
the other choice, although respectable (and view to do so many free professionals), is: for n reasons, the choice of the machine that I will use is the German sw 4wd, 250 cv , etc.. which costs 50000 euros. and, of course, every three years changes it because it's not safe anymore, etc... getting a little, that's 10000 euros, because it's 200000 km, nobody wants it.
to this second free professional, only the cost of the machine, will affect ' 40000 euros (50000 less the 10000 obtained) , and, "spalmati" on 3 years, will be , approximately 7.5 euros/hour.
a difference of 6 euro/hour, without even having talked about home, telephone, office, chairs, magazines, courses, furniture, schools for children, boat, glider, holidays, etc...
then the software and the hardware . for which:
1) most times the choice of one or another is not a free choice, but an imposition of the market (by sector) or the customer.
2) Considering amortization of 3 years, and a purchase cost of 10000 euros + hardware 5000 + software fee/assistance 2500, the incidence comes to be 3.5 euros per hour.
at the end of the accounts, for one of the two professionals, it will be possible to make 30 euros / hour and earn decently. for the other, it will be impossible to do less than 70 euros per hour and, at the time when he loses a contract because another offered 55 euros per hour, then if he takes it with taxes, with the employees, with the unfair competitors, with the software house, with the world.