problem configurations in combination

[volaff]

hello to all, always apologize for destroying but now you find an inexhaustible source of information.

I have a k set composed of, for example, subset to,b,c.

of the configuration b I created two configurations b1 and b2.
how can I do to display the two different b1 and b2 configurations in the k axieme?
I tried to directly create the two configurations in k but the bond chosen to suppress (and that differentiates the two configurations) is not selectable in the sense that it does not appear to me right in the drop-down menu "configure function"-

thank you as always!! !

 

[marcof]

hello to all, always apologize for destroying but now you find an inexhaustible source of information.

I have a k set composed of, for example, subset to,b,c.

of the configuration b I created two configurations b1 and b2.
how can I do to display the two different b1 and b2 configurations in the k axieme?
I tried to directly create the two configurations in k but the bond chosen to suppress (and that differentiates the two configurations) is not selectable in the sense that it does not appear to me right in the drop-down menu "configure function"-

thank you as always!! !

It is not very clear to me what your problem is, so I can answer anything else. . .

First of all when you write "the b configuration I created two b1 and b2 configurations" I imagine you wanted to say thattogether b you have created the two configurations, because b, more above you indicate it, as subaxieme of k and not as configuration of k

then if you have to activate one of the two config of the subassieme b click with the right, choose properties and select the configuration that you seerve. if you want instead that the config of the subaxieme depends on a configuration of the axieme k you must have two config of the axieme k in each of which you will activate the configuration of the axieme b therefore a scheme like this
k(config1)/b(configb1)
k(config2)/b(configb2)

 

[volaff]

It is not very clear to me what your problem is, so I can answer anything else. . .

First of all when you write "the b configuration I created two b1 and b2 configurations" I imagine you wanted to say thattogether b you have created the two configurations, because b, more above you indicate it, as subaxieme of k and not as configuration of k

then if you have to activate one of the two config of the subassieme b click with the right, choose properties and select the configuration that you seerve. if you want instead that the config of the subaxieme depends on a configuration of the axieme k you must have two config of the axieme k in each of which you will activate the configuration of the axieme b therefore a scheme like this
k(config1)/b(configb1)
k(config2)/b(configb2)

Thank you very much.
All clear.
good start of day.

See you soon!

 

[volaff]

Good afternoon.
I came to realize the partial axieme with the two configurations as suggested by marcof.
Now if I go to mirror the error in figure where, on the other hand, it does not even maintain the relationships of assemblies in the mirrored axieme.
How can I solve this?
Is that normal?
I select the components (subassistances and parts) to mirror and the plan making "hand copy opposite".

thank you all and apologize for the thousand doubts!
Greetings.
fly

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

because the basic model used to create the mirror, which are those indicated in options system> default models have different measurement settings from the mirror files.

 

[volaff]

because the basic model used to create the mirror, which are those indicated in options system> default models have different measurement settings from the mirror files.

In practice, therefore, for the mirroring I have to have the error?
I tried to set the other voice but the result seems to be the same.

 

[volaff]

because the basic model used to create the mirror, which are those indicated in options system> default models have different measurement settings from the mirror files.

Excuse me, I missed this step a moment.
the parts used for mirroring are all expressed in mm.

That's weird.
How can you solve?

the problem is that with these mistakes does not matter certain constraints, a little mess!

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

the parts used for mirroring are all expressed in mm.

but there's not only the length units.
However in theory if you use the same model you should not have problems.

the problem is that with these mistakes does not matter certain constraints, a little mess!

What does it have to do with the constraints?

 

[volaff]

but there's not only the length units.
However in theory if you use the same model you should not have problems.


What does it have to do with the constraints?

If at that error I always put yes, yes, at the end it tells me that it cannot import certain constraints.

Excuse me but use the same model in what sense?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

If at that error I always put yes, yes, at the end it tells me that it cannot import certain constraints.

could mean that the model used to create the mirror has a different unit of measurement and therefore some coupling is erased to not generate error. It's a hypothesis because I didn't but happen. Of course you can't put the files and so you can't think about it concretely.

Excuse me but use the same model in what sense?

that the model with which you create the mirror is the same as the model with which you created the part to mirror. It doesn't seem difficult to understand.
is written above

because the basic model used to create the mirror, which are those indicated in options system> default models have different measurement settings from the mirror files.

 

[volaff]

could mean that the model used to create the mirror has a different unit of measurement and therefore some coupling is erased to not generate error. It's a hypothesis because I didn't but happen. Of course you can't put the files and so you can't think about it concretely.


that the model with which you create the mirror is the same as the model with which you created the part to mirror. It doesn't seem difficult to understand.
is written above

I believe I have understood the archer: a piece is created as a configuration of the same file part (using the function mirrors and deletes body) and this generates the error you know.

Thank you!

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I believe I have understood the archer: a piece is created as a configuration of the same file part (using the function mirrors and deletes body) and this generates the error you know.

if you use the same model as the original, create the configuration instead of a new part not from any problem.
if with the mirror you create a new part using a model in meters instead of in millimeters, in ounces instead of in kilos another type of problem.

 

[volaff]

if you use the same model as the original, create the configuration instead of a new part not from any problem.
if with the mirror you create a new part using a model in meters instead of in millimeters, in ounces instead of in kilos another type of problem.

on the weekend I try to create the axieme by doing a part dx and a sx and then doing the mirroring in the opposite hand.
thank you so much for the availability as always.