• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

help in achieving this geometry

  • Thread starter Thread starter Santiago94
  • Start date Start date

Santiago94

Guest
Cattura di schermata (211).webpCattura di schermata (212).webpCattura di schermata (213).webpAs from the title, I would like to understand how to create this geometry, I'm a graduate, I know the program, this is the first difficulty I encounter, on a job. I hope I can't understand it. Thank you for the answer
 
Of course you could attach the file.. .
to the eye I would say with loft functions
 
I managed to make the central "hole" with the extrusion loft function. the other two are not clear to me just as image
 
I write it once again just as long as you can't play hiding. . .
this image
Where do you jump from? Did you download it from the internet? Did a client turn it to make you suffer? Did you get it by taking a screenshot of the open file with edrawings?
here, if the right answer is the last allega 'the cursed file, any format is so we can also see how it is done
 
just to understand what your preparation is and to aim for any answers; You say you know the program, and you didn't know that the central part should be done with a loft? Do you have a basic course behind you? Did you do a little tutorial?
 
I do not think it is necessary to "heat", is a pdf file, I was asked to run it by a customer. I just can't understand how side holes are, as they are done, they don't allow the entrance of a conduct (from what I see and understand). but maybe I was wrong to ask here, thank you anyway for the time lost. My preparation was born from a 3 cfu course at the university. That's all.
 
Of course you are permalosini... I see a 3d file on your screen and since you did not write anywhere that the customer turned you a pdf I ask you the file. instead of answering that is a pdf say all else; you will allow, without information about the nature of the file, to remove it that you need to see it to understand how it is done
I'm not getting hot anyway. I am trying to understand and have information that is not present.
You mean the client sent you a pdf with that image and asked you to do it again? the pdf is 3d, that is, can you rotate it?
lack information like sheet thickness (which is little but you can not exclude that it gives problems of geometry, and especially how the side tube is attached.
If you can't make her a normal loft by assuming a lower measure and you're fineImmagine.webp
 
Of course you are permalosini... I see a 3d file on your screen and since you did not write anywhere that the customer turned you a pdf I ask you the file. instead of answering that is a pdf say all else; you will allow, without information about the nature of the file, to remove it that you need to see it to understand how it is done
I'm not getting hot anyway. I am trying to understand and have information that is not present.
You mean the client sent you a pdf with that image and asked you to do it again? the pdf is 3d, that is, can you rotate it?
lack information like sheet thickness (which is little but you can not exclude that it gives problems of geometry, and especially how the side tube is attached.
If you can't make her a normal loft by assuming a lower measure and you're fineView attachment 46662
You're too good.
 
I thought it was clear that it was a pdf, there is also written in the screen. Anyway yes, he sent me the pdf and I have to remake the object, I have no other information outside the quotas, in other images. I think I'm going to ask for some kind of disappointment to him, but he knows less than I do.
 
I thought it was clear that this is a pdf, there is also written in the screen
I dwelt on the object not on the window that contained it. It was enough for me to tell me Wake up, don't you see it's a pdf?
I think I'm going to ask for some kind of disappointment to him, but he knows less than I do.
bhé asking him is the first thing to do since in theory he should know what he needs. but if he doesn't know, turn the image I've attached and make him happy. even because if you don't have enough information to build that thing, how could we have it? and it is not understood whether it is a problem of solidworks or design logic
 
I will ask, I thought it was my problem not to understand from the image some things, maybe you having experience knew more. I thank you again for the time lost, hoping to have clarifications from him. does not want an image, but the stl file for a possible 3d print Cattura di schermata (214).webp I had done this
 
from the last image I tell you there are a couple of things that don't go
- Subdefined scraps. in a parametric cad you do not work with sketches that are not completely bound and quotated.
- There are 3 floors, one is definitely too much. to tell the truth would be enough only one at altitude +800 from the base
- there is a cutting function that should not serve
-The two side parts are full and empty
-instead of remaking the lateral body twice with the loft it is better to use the mirror function

considering these things I recommend you do or remake tutorials because you lack some fundamentals
 
does not want an image, but the stl file for a possible 3d print
Of course he wants a file to do something, the image already has it. That was my joke.
but just because you have to print You need to know as it is done that piece also internally. Is it empty? if you what thickness you have and how do side vents graft? Is there a dig on the side of the central body? and so on.
you can't imagine, at least you don't pay in packs on your shoulders and hands tight then send him what you can do in the shortest possible time
 
Thanks for the tips, I will see to settle, we do not talk about economic compensation.. but for my experience I want to do well anyway. I'll see what I can do.
 
If I don't pay, I'd just send him the pictures to show him that the job was done. then for stl files must open the wallet
on the other hand the files are my property; If it does not commission anything and therefore there is a remuneration agreement cannot assert any right. always that the agreement does not accept the free labor clause
 
I still expect his delucidations on geometry, but regarding the economic aspect on what do I have to rely on to make a payment proposal? will be a 5/6 pieces including that in question. I don't know if I'm wrong to write it here. If this is the case I can open another discussion
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top