large drawings

[tanticapelli]

https://forum.solidworks.com/thread/224791Poor thing, too, they didn't even calculate it. . .

 

[tanticapelli]

https://forum.solidworks.com/thread/224791Poor thing, too, they didn't even calculate it. . .

 

[drake]

Hi.
Since you mentioned the carpentry that is just my sector, I wonder how you manage a board of a large set (with more views and sections, quotations, colors, annotations and bubbles that is well finished enough to be presentable once printed on plotter in a0) which has at best 15 minutes as opening time and from there on begin pains.. .

with zoom and pan goes to snaps and when quoti is slow and often happens to have difficulty selection of edges etc etc.

and that you can't think of drawing some eyes!

with these presupposes to bring to the end a table of certain dimensions shatters madness.

and feel the tricks of those who work with autocad is just even more irritating.

then we are in the same sector, also I know this annoying "lowening" of the performance at the table. which I have also discussed several times in the forum. I don't think there's a single solution, except to make an ad hoc model for what you want to represent. the teasing with those of autocad makes no sense of course, as he played among fans! the only thing you have to do is wait and set solid with all the necessary shortcomings to streamline it, as spoken so many times in the forum...

 

[tanticapelli]

I agree with you, I also sometimes create assemblies specially for the table.
but I can do this for the intermediate stages of laying.
for the boards to be sent to approval instead I can not simplify because they are the most detailed with so much screws and bolts. . .

I'll make a point, you want me to tell you.

 

[muzzetto]

Greetings to everyone.
we do not make carpentry, nor do we work on large assemblies, nor do we have performance stations.
However, when we design our production department, complete with all the machinery we design, the performance collapses to make the work frustrating.
the technician who supports us advised us to:
- create a 'simplified' configuration of the most arzygogular parts and more complex subaxis.
- in the 'assieme' department layout 'use such configurations (from us called 'easy')

Such configurations must of course have coupling geometries, while they can give up roundings, computationally difficult geometries, small details, minor parts.

I hope I've been helpful.
Matteo

 

[tanticapelli]

Greetings to everyone.
we do not make carpentry, nor do we work on large assemblies, nor do we have performance stations.
However, when we design our production department, complete with all the machinery we design, the performance collapses to make the work frustrating.
the technician who supports us advised us to:
- create a 'simplified' configuration of the most arzygogular parts and more complex subaxis.
- in the 'assieme' department layout 'use such configurations (from us called 'easy')

Such configurations must of course have coupling geometries, while they can give up roundings, computationally difficult geometries, small details, minor parts.

I hope I've been helpful.
Matteo

They told me too.
However, I find it not easy to identify the right compromise of lightening.. . see the drawings to be sent to the approval of which I wrote higher...
I'll have a high performance workstation on trial tomorrow. .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

with all respect, but if you start with such a phrase

we do not make carpentry, nor do we work on large assemblies, nor do we have performance stations.

You have no skills to talk about big assemblies and only bring back what the technician told you.

if you work on large assemblies, with hundreds of types of parts, and of each part you have to make a complete configuration for the design and a simplified for the assemblies and perhaps other necessary for the operation of the project, do you have any idea of the casino coming out?
molded parts already knowing what you will be able to stay and what not yet in the project phase and if you have to change something you are lost
sub-assiem with dozens of configurations to manage all combinations of parts
and also, but not least for importance, be sure that in the table all that you have suspended will not serve you because otherwise you have to take back in hand the assist and remand the configurations.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Moreover muzzetto, it would be useful, besides educated, that you give an answer to all those who intervened to give you a hand in this discussion https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/curva-da-equazione.54015/#post-421231

 

[muzzetto]

I just brought back my experience, not that of the technician.
in the axieme and then at the table we put only what needed, obtaining superior performance of much and greater clarity.
in the department we have various plants, some from us designed in detail.
being the design of the department intended to identify encumbrances, intake pipes and other services, not all components of each plant had reason to appear.
I am a jump user, entrepreneur 98% and designer 2%, so not at the level of many among you.
However, I would point out that the instrument falls 3d, with its calculation power, calls on the designer to 'strafare', i.e. to put all the fit.
a little parsimony and attention to the purpose for which the table is built would not match.

If my considerations seem discounted or banal, I apologize.

As for the discussion on the equation curve, not having received email notifications, I thought it was over. I'm gonna go get her back.
I intervened only to make my contribution to mathematics as a rusty engineer.
m

 

[tanticapelli]

Hello Massive
I recently discovered how to customize the toolbox and I noticed that x es of a normal hexagonal head bolt as well as being able to add non-default dimensions it is possible to disable existing ones that maybe already know that I will hardly use. and there are so many.
Could this last aspect of your opinion contribute to the lightening of the great together?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I would say that the toolbox components that have unused equations and functions like the helical sweep for the thread should not be used.
you create a special library

 

[meccanicamg]

I always threw the toolboxes and made my screws draw with stem and parametric head through table excel. zero problems and customizable when necessary.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

muzzetto, the speech is that if you have to model a frame or a carpentry base along about ten meters, in the constructive table must have all the holes, all the smnussi, all the platelets of ribbing... In short everything; and it is not easy in the design phase to set the features so as to suspend those that will not serve in the general aid.
if you have to do the assembly aid you must maintain all the components, even the 3mm plug, because it serves for the distinct and serves to indicate to the operator where the particular determninate should be used.
This configuration speech that the technician told you is fine if you make layouts of encumbrance (in which case maybe it is even better speedpack), not if you make constructive to send to the workshop and to the assembly.

However, I would point out that the instrument falls 3d, with its calculation power, calls on the designer to 'strafare', i.e. to put all the fit.

This phrase of yours seems silly to me. The designer must put what it takes. if you put a bevel in a plate is because that plate must have the bevel, if it makes 5 holes instead of 3 is because they also serve those 2 extra.

a little parsimony and attention to the purpose for which the table is built would not match.

In fact. but you do not know what the purpose of the tables of many hairs is. . .

 

[tanticapelli]

Hello everyone

I noticed that default windows have an energy saving option set on "bilanced" system.
what does not allow the most powerful cpus to take advantage of the maximum frequency (such as the turbo boost of the intel processors).

if from "bilanced" we put it on "excellent" performance the problem is no longer there and you gain something in terms of performance (see that the bottle neck is almost always cpu).

clearly you consume more electricity. . .

all this without touching anything in the bios.

Hi.

so many hairs

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

I take advantage of the ongoing discussion to ask you if what they show in this video is interesting as it looks.

 

[tanticapelli]

but will there be promotional videos where they show drawings of great assemblies?

 

[drake]

presentations of new versions, as well as demonstration videos, I would always take them with pliers. are only commercial maneuvers or at least for the most part. I do not say that you have not tried to lighten anything, but I have really strong doubts, not to say that I do not believe it at all. then explain why every new version is heavier than the previous one? Why do they advise you to evaluate the replacement of three-year-old ws? I still remember when I passed from 2012 to 2016, in pump magna they said that the version made make less klik.... I only know that the design times for me were perfectly equal, with the difference that 2016 turned on a new ws...

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

presentations of new versions, as well as demonstration videos, I would always take them with pliers. are only commercial maneuvers or at least for the most part.

I agree with you.

I do not say that you have not tried to lighten anything, but I have really strong doubts, not to say that I do not believe it at all. then explain why every new version is heavier than the previous one?

As for lightening, in 2017 I had found a problem in the environment part that in 2018 there is no more: made a cube, copied in linear repetition 20 x 20 copies, trying to isolate one it took a minute or two to complete the operation.
so for what I saw: "Although it moves."

Why do they advise you to evaluate the replacement of three-year-old ws? I still remember when I passed from 2012 to 2016, in pump magna they said that the version made make less klik.... I only know that the design times for me were perfectly equal, with the difference that 2016 turned on a new ws...

Sometimes only the update of the antivirus is enough to sit a pc. On the other hand, I think the updates for sw always bring something new, contrary to other programs. then I think it depends on the type of job you do: if the new functions are used, then everything makes sense, otherwise it is worth staying a few laps.

However, I posted the video to ask if a really big set is shown or not.

 

[drake]

I agree with you.

As for lightening, in 2017 I had found a problem in the environment part that in 2018 there is no more: made a cube, copied in linear repetition 20 x 20 copies, trying to isolate one it took a minute or two to complete the operation.
so for what I saw: "Although it moves."

Sometimes only the update of the antivirus is enough to sit a pc. On the other hand, I think the updates for sw always bring something new, contrary to other programs. then I think it depends on the type of job you do: if the new functions are used, then everything makes sense, otherwise it is worth staying a few laps.

However, I posted the video to ask if a really big set is shown or not.

I agree with you. but today they took away your chance to stay still x some lap... what was possible before. what they could have avoided sincerely.
I don't think it's just a big set, unless all the components you see contain everything but everything.

 

[Baltoro]

This phrase of yours seems silly to me. the designer must put what is needed

"The designer must put what he needs" is Holy!

but that sentence is not foolish at all.
many times the problem is not the drawing parts, but the commercials.
I have seen things that you humans (etc. etc.) as bearings with all spheres and screws with helical threads. In addition with "image quality" (tipping, this unknown) shot at ball. or motor groups imported with fifteen thousand surfaces without even an attempt to clean the input.

about image quality, I remember that a cruder quality of higher groups non ha influsso on the accuracy of the designs and/or the files exported, nor on that of subgroups and parts.

this not always to blame the user (even because the user usually - if he did the course - applies what the dealer teaches him!) but I assure you that often the triplets are those, and once you have settled the asses things go much better.

all this is true more less for all cad 3d, with different forms but recurrent substance.

as regards solidworks, it is advisable to deepen the commands "display of asses" e "assessment", with an eye to the "graphic-triangoli" and "total triangles".

Once the critical areas are identified, one can understand where it makes sense to intervene.
because even on the parts and drawing groups, it is often enough to simplify (even hinds) only a few particular groups.