I'm working on a set, about 250 pieces. are the same as before the update. the project is the samebut you cannot give an answer if you do not have a new minimum of context.
What are you doing? a bevel on a plate or a drawing from 1000 pieces and dozens of views? Did you do a function statistics? have you optimized system options? are the same options as the previous version? in the previous version you did an identical or very similar job and you have a match?
most likely you have the trigger 3d activatedoften and willingly calls me quotas
I've been using it for about a year and basically, so I ask you a question, what do you mean by mathematics? constraints? even if I've never had these problems. all the project was made with the 2018 version, the same that I use but from another pc. I know that my friend has the sp0 because he does not want to update.some questions:
-The final mathematicians are all stuck in read-only?
-the majority of these mathematicians, with which version of sw were made?
When you slow down a lot, did you try to do ctrl+q?
the oldest dates back to the sw2016. I had done it before I bought the license 2018. The thing that leaves me puzzled is that on the work that I did directly with this version has no problem. (I'm trying) this project was started by another person with 2018, but at this point I have serious doubts that it recovered from inventor and then converted.for "mathematics" are usually 3d models.
ctrl+q is the top-level overall regeneration command (all is regenerated).
it happens that with mathematicians made with very old versions of solidworks, even if they are updated to the current, remain algorithms that are bad to marry with the current version, which also generates problems of slowing and slow graphics (from me we are subject to unfortunately); with the ctrl+q regenerates everything and the program regains speed and performance graphics, unfortunately, however, to the rescue, these algorithms are not replaced and therefore the problem reproposes to every rescue and every opening; who distributes sw recommends to remake even the starting templates at least every 2-3 releases and limit copies of very old maths.
You are absolutely sure All were mathematicians made with 2018?
This is a good tip. Do you know where I can find him? as I told you I'm not very specialist, I just design it.. .a good starting point is to retrace the mathematics with the conversion tool and bring them to 2018.
very simple. the project had been started by me, then transferred to another person who for his convenience had done it in inventor, which I didn't like. and was remade in solidworks 2018 sp0.if they are converted by another modeler should not have functions.
if it has functions should be almost all subdefined
Did you do the analysis of function statistics?
in post #5 you say it's the same project you used in the previous version and before it didn't bother you; Now you say it's a project started by another person. Can you explain the situation better?
Who did that again? you or others?and was remade in solidworks 2018 sp0
What does that mean? you did it in solidworks, you passed it to someone who did it in inventor (from zero I suppose) and now you have it, you or others, made in solid from scratch? or are you all working on imported parts from step/iges? in case, you have converted the steps with recognition functions and find yourself with a mass of subdefined sketches and dozens of functions without logic?rebuilding everything after months is not as simple as one who does it every day...all here.