Onyx68
Guest
I would like to ask you about "legality" when a "connect" is signed on the project of another ... how is it called? data theft? copyright? ... I ask for clarification... Thank you.
New Rider
Guest
ma dai......
Onyx68
Guest
cacciatorino
Guest
You should be a little more circumstantial, you don't understand what happened to you and so it becomes difficult to give an opinion.
ragnol
Guest
In the matter of law, if necessary 
I didn't understand the matter well. do you make a project and a colleague/register your signature?
Do you work in the same office? I don't think he comes in at night and signatures. .
do you work for the same company? there will be internal directives on who-do-what. . .
many designers/designers (also with stamps) of technical offices direct elaborate that are then signed by the office head, the holder of the studio etc etc.
It depends on how things are. .
I didn't understand the matter well. do you make a project and a colleague/register your signature?
Do you work in the same office? I don't think he comes in at night and signatures. .
do you work for the same company? there will be internal directives on who-do-what. . .
many designers/designers (also with stamps) of technical offices direct elaborate that are then signed by the office head, the holder of the studio etc etc.
It depends on how things are. .
Onyx68
Guest
Thank you for the answer.In the matter of law, if necessary
I didn't understand the matter well. do you make a project and a colleague/register your signature?
Do you work in the same office? I don't think he comes in at night and signatures. .
do you work for the same company? there will be internal directives on who-do-what. . .
many designers/designers (also with stamps) of technical offices direct elaborate that are then signed by the office head, the holder of the studio etc etc.
It depends on how things are. .
Yes. I elaborated a project and during the preventive phase a "connect" signed itself as author of the project. specific that I have no agreement. Plus him and just a manualist. not particularist for more designer... .
Biggmetals
Guest
Tell the owner, right?
ragnol
Guest
Worked for a presumed company. .
who regulates these and other events, among your superiors? Let employees "scannino" is a good way to hurt (and worse) things, by my experience. as an example (I do not know the situation), if they confirm work one in your situation may have this attitude: "for the executive turn to red mario, not to me. He's the designer. any aspects, details, calculations, etc. to be detailed are his."
who regulates these and other events, among your superiors? Let employees "scannino" is a good way to hurt (and worse) things, by my experience. as an example (I do not know the situation), if they confirm work one in your situation may have this attitude: "for the executive turn to red mario, not to me. He's the designer. any aspects, details, calculations, etc. to be detailed are his."
Onyx68
Guest
Thank you for the answer. but not the right one. even if the project is okay how it ends? ... I expected some competent forum if you know... the holder has no idea of uff tec.
ragnol
Guest
Sorry, I didn't realize you're evaluating a case (if I understood correctly).
but as biggmetals says, start by presenting it to some superiors, right? !
if the owner does not have any knowledge of the technical office, to send a correction of the estimate to the customer indicating that the designer is you, and that you communicate it so that they know to whom they must address for any information? type: "We send a quote with the correct indication of the designer, in order to avoid disguising if you need information/integrations/details...". Like that?
without precise info it is difficult to give you an opinion, I am making you examples based on common sense
but as biggmetals says, start by presenting it to some superiors, right? !
if the owner does not have any knowledge of the technical office, to send a correction of the estimate to the customer indicating that the designer is you, and that you communicate it so that they know to whom they must address for any information? type: "We send a quote with the correct indication of the designer, in order to avoid disguising if you need information/integrations/details...". Like that?
without precise info it is difficult to give you an opinion, I am making you examples based on common sense
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
It's not even the right section. posting in solidworks other users, perhaps experts in the matter, to which does not interest the section pass beyond.
recommend contacting a moderator and moving the discussion
recommend contacting a moderator and moving the discussion
Onyx68
Guest
If you can indicate the right section, I will be grateful.
cacciatorino
Guest
done, thanks for the suggestion.
exxon
Guest
you have already been asked and have not answered: are you dependent? We suppose so, since you quote "the owner".
because, if you are dependent, nothing is "you" of what you develop within the company for which you work: everything belongs to the company. Even in case you invented the perpetual motion, the only right you would have would be that "moral", but all the others would be in charge of who hired you.
said that, even if you wanted, you could not sue anyone, since you would have been taken away something that does not belong to you. It would be a little like you went to the Carabinieri to report the theft of the pencil that was taken away from your desk by your colleague from the office in front of you. The pencil is not yours, you can't do it.
just to clarify, the "competent forum" has nothing to do with: that is established by territoriality, based on where the eventual fact, towards which legal action is undertaken, took place.
What I think you're looking for is probably something that has to do with copyright. there are specialized sections of the courts in the court offices of appeal, which deal with these causes. In your case, I repeat, you don't have the titles to do anything.
Maybe nobody asked you yet, but because you didn't go to the usurper to tell him... Well? ?
because, if you are dependent, nothing is "you" of what you develop within the company for which you work: everything belongs to the company. Even in case you invented the perpetual motion, the only right you would have would be that "moral", but all the others would be in charge of who hired you.
said that, even if you wanted, you could not sue anyone, since you would have been taken away something that does not belong to you. It would be a little like you went to the Carabinieri to report the theft of the pencil that was taken away from your desk by your colleague from the office in front of you. The pencil is not yours, you can't do it.
just to clarify, the "competent forum" has nothing to do with: that is established by territoriality, based on where the eventual fact, towards which legal action is undertaken, took place.
What I think you're looking for is probably something that has to do with copyright. there are specialized sections of the courts in the court offices of appeal, which deal with these causes. In your case, I repeat, you don't have the titles to do anything.
Maybe nobody asked you yet, but because you didn't go to the usurper to tell him... Well? ?
drake
Guest
I believe that at this stage of the dispute, which I presume is initial, thinking of suing, I believe is the most wrong thing ever. I can't think that a owner doesn't know what's going on inside his office, and that doesn't affect the fact that you have to turn to him before anything else. if he is not aware, he makes him aware of what happens between his staff.
As I wrote, the exxon response came, which I share in tote.
As I wrote, the exxon response came, which I share in tote.
TECNOMODEL
Guest
I agree with what you've already been told by others, if you're an employee your colleague didn't "steal" anything, you just got nice with your job.
Unfortunately they are things that often happen, and just as often to tell the owner does not need anything.
he only cares that the job is done and that his company gains.
Unfortunately they are things that often happen, and just as often to tell the owner does not need anything.
he only cares that the job is done and that his company gains.
teseo
Guest
if the last part changed even a little bit but by little maybe the companies would earn a lot more....
the relaxed and serene climate in the office or in the workshop or where you want, earns everyone: the employer and the employees who do not intend to think how ixxxxe next would work in their place. .
These characters should be fired in the trunk.
but in my opinion, if you go well to see, it is convenient to the ignorant owner who thinks that with the reciprocal inculation everything goes better.... .
ahh one thing these owners would also be to be fired in the trunk...
Hi.
TECNOMODEL
Guest
I agree to 200%, unfortunately are still many entrepreneurs who adopt the method "divid et impera"
teseo
Guest
and in fact we are good
Hi.
Hi.
ragnol
Guest
the concept that I share and that I had expressed myself.. .