• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

automatic couplings

  • Thread starter Thread starter margas
  • Start date Start date

margas

Guest
Good morning.
I have a difficult problem (I don't even know if it's possible).
I often have to create perimeter protections for robotic islands, using models of poles and panels (e.g. image)Snipaste_2019-05-09_14-18-13.webpI have to hand-pair the panel to the pole (3 couplings of coincidence).
it would be convenient to be able to drag a panel (or a pole) into the axieme and make the coupling automatic. the problem is that I can only make sure that the panel fits on the same face, but I have no chance to choose which of the 4 faces of the pole.
can you tell me if it is possible somehow to do this?

Thank you.
 
Can you use the "cpoints" of piping?
then, if I don't remember badly, I remember seeing something like this, an example video in which a roller coaster was quickly assimilated by quick connection points, perhaps a feature of 2018, I don't remember
 
Can you use the "cpoints" of piping?
then, if I don't remember badly, I remember seeing something like this, an example video in which a roller coaster was quickly assimilated by quick connection points, perhaps a feature of 2018, I don't remember
I thought about it but I wasn't sure if it was a function that was enabled for all my colleagues, I try to think about it.
yes the problem is that, even if I configure several couplings, when I draw one part on the other I only detect the first of the couplings and ignore the others, preventing me from choosing on what side of the pole anchor the panel. I have made several attempts but without result. I'm probably wrong something because from the guide should work, and yet nothing. specific that pairs have the same name as required.
 
Hello, I also work on robotic islands and as you to define perimeter networks, doors etc. I created a standard set with different configurations and depending on what I need to select the configuration I need. you have to always put three pairs but made the first all others are fast enough with the copy command with couplings, moreover if you use this command with two or more assemblies always three couplings to place it but the function takes behind all two or more assemblies where the other couplings have already been defined before.I do not know other methods and with configurations I can then define the lengths of the nets, so I put it half hour.
 
is an explanation that does not allow to think of a solution.
the explanation was contained in my previous post, I can reform it.
Thank you for the videos but I know how to make the coupling. the problem is that it does not work as it should (clearly wrong I something), that is: as you see in the first picture, I have poles and panels. I start with a fixed pole in the axieme, and I would like to be able to drag a panel to a face and I would like the automatic coupling to be created. as you see in the schematic image below (talk from above) I can have 8 panel positions compared to the pole, 2 per facepalo.webpnot having a "mask" and a "female", the 3 references are planes and faces.
After several attempts I came to the point that, dragging the panel to the pole, I was recognized the automatic coupling on 3 faces (6 couplings) but not the fourth. so I came close to the final solution but from there I do not crash.
Hello, I also work on robotic islands and as you to define perimeter networks, doors etc. I created a standard set with different configurations and depending on what I need to select the configuration I need. you have to always put three pairs but made the first all others are fast enough with the copy command with couplings, moreover if you use this command with two or more assemblies always three couplings to place it but the function takes behind all two or more assemblies where the other couplings have already been defined before.I do not know other methods and with configurations I can then define the lengths of the nets, so I put it half hour.
the standard axieme can not create it because each pole has a dozen configuration and the panels even more, so they have to be coupled individually between them so that every time I insert a pole or panel allows me to change the size using the configurations.

I probably can't explain myself completely, if needed, I can load the models I use.
 
the problem is that I have to have 8 mating rules that coexist, and depending on where I go to place the panel on the pole should activate a coupling, so you can choose the side on which to place it
 
the explanation was contained in my previous post, I can reform it.
Thank you for the videos but I know how to make the coupling. the problem is that it does not work as it should (clearly wrong I something), that is: as you see in the first picture, I have poles and panels. I start with a fixed pole in the axieme, and I would like to be able to drag a panel to a face and I would like the automatic coupling to be created. as you see in the schematic image below (talk from above) I can have 8 panel positions compared to the pole, 2 per faceView attachment 53755not having a "mask" and a "female", the 3 references are planes and faces.
After several attempts I came to the point that, dragging the panel to the pole, I was recognized the automatic coupling on 3 faces (6 couplings) but not the fourth. so I came close to the final solution but from there I do not crash.


the standard axieme can not create it because each pole has a dozen configuration and the panels even more, so they have to be coupled individually between them so that every time I insert a pole or panel allows me to change the size using the configurations.

I probably can't explain myself completely, if needed, I can load the models I use.
In my opinion, if you place the axieme, you make life easier always that you can obviously. ...
Hi.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top