connect a note to a property of a subassieme

[Pablo]

goodsera.uso swx 2015. recurrent problem: I have to connect a note to a property of a subaxieme present in a view, but every time I have to invent something new because I have never succeeded, that is, the options I know are: 1- link the note to a propr. of the axieme of 1° level or - 2- connect the note to the base component (part) to which the note itself points. question: but if I have 2 or more levels, is it possible to point the note to a predetermined level? Moreover, always to circumvent the problem, I promoted the components of a set (which we will call a) all at first level, believing to solve, but the note, this time, despite the distinct show all my subcomponents contained in the assieme a (promoted), if I go to ball a subassieme of a, the note continues to show me the name of the axie and not already that of the underlying. I hope to be clear in the exhibition. Thanks to who can help me.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Do you want to use a note or a bubble?

 

[Pablo]

Do you want to use a note or a bubble?

is indifferent. ..just get the desired result. I've already tried with both... I have seen that since 2016 they have done something about it... But I don't think I'm comfortable and fast. and in any case I use 2015. .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

with notes you can't do it.
with bubble siin function to how you impose the distinct materials. it is not enough to set first level or only parts, but it is necessary to set the various subaxis because they show or not the parts. or create a special column in the separate one that will then be hidden.
You must see the goal in the general framework I understand the primary purpose of the distinction and then that of the note/balance.

 

[Pablo]

with notes you can't do it.
with bubble siin function to how you impose the distinct materials. it is not enough to set first level or only parts, but it is necessary to set the various subaxis because they show or not the parts. or create a special column in the separate one that will then be hidden.
You must see the goal in the general framework I understand the primary purpose of the distinction and then that of the note/balance.

Sorry, I was convinced that I already responded to you Saturday morning but I think I didn't "inviate."... my case is quite simple, within a set (a) I grouped some parts and assemble into a subaxieme (b), but I want these parts and assemblies to be displayed in the first-level distinction of a, so I promoted the components of b. all right here, b is properly promoted in distinct. the problem is that if I collect a property related to the "component", I can't make it point to b but the note goes up to or on the propage of the elementary part contained in b. I hope it is clear. . .