design of particular

[MassiVonWeizen]

reason:
what you have quoted ø is represented drawn, which in the technical design indicates an area that has material, so in fact you have not represented a hole.
putting even if you wanted to represent a hole you did it for all the thickness (40) of the round part and inside it represents a threaded hole; is it possible that a threaded hole inside a hole? The answer is clearly not.
analyzes well that part of the drawing

 

[orlluca]

I didn't write that hole 30 doesn't go, I wrote that it's wrong. to be more precise is not a hole, but a lamatura and is represented wrong.
pv, pl, little are terms that tell me nothing.

vertical floor
pl lateral plane
horizontal position

 

[Martakynghi]

vertical floor
pl lateral plane
horizontal position

Maybe I had to write like this to make me understand

 

[TECNOMODEL]

Maybe I had to write like this to make me understand

beyond the small misunderstanding, the fact remains that that design contains big errors.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I meant that I didn't indicate in that design what the plan corresponds to the view,
also because to follow the technical drawing abecedary the views must be placed on the upper left (vertical floor), on the upper right (side floor) and on the lower left (horizontal plan).
So in that design what is each of these?
is it not better to write view on the top left, which can be a soltato without ambiguity whatsoever?

 

[Martakynghi]

diameter 30 arranged?

 

[TECNOMODEL]

diameter 30 arranged?

almost, how deep is that lamatura?

 

[Martakynghi]

6mm

 

[TECNOMODEL]

6mm

It was an imput to make you think about the job you're doing.
You don't have to tell me, you have to indicate it in the table. otherwise who realizes the piece how does it know how much to go deep with the processing?
because the drawings serve this...

 

[Martakynghi]

It was an imput to make you think about the job you're doing.
You don't have to tell me, you have to indicate it in the table. otherwise who realizes the piece how does it know how much to go deep with the processing?
because the drawings serve this...

Okay. other mistakes?

 

[TECNOMODEL]

Okay. other mistakes?

If you're referring to that last sight I don't see any more, but time is little and your attitude doesn't help me to devote some time to correcting your work.
good continuation.

 

[Martakynghi]

In general... I apologize if I looked inadequate.

 

[TECNOMODEL]

In general... I apologize if I looked inadequate.

post the entire table updated

 

[Martakynghi]

Thank you.

 

[TECNOMODEL]

Thank you.

the projection is wrong, does not coincide with the method indicated in the cartilage.
the diameters I would quota them in the side view, like threads.
the 20 you put in the left view indicates the thickness of the base? If you do not understand that position, it should be placed in the side view.
If you wanted to quote the length of that plan that ends on the radius is not correct, it is almost impossible to measure.
the perpendicularity with b can not indicate it on a quota, it should be indicated on the axis of the hole.
missing the width of the lower part of the piece. It can be derived from the value of the radius but I would share it to simplify life to those who build it.
I see nothing else for now.

 

[Martakynghi]

I did this exercise. I wanted to know how it is...
(I think I did less disaster than the first exercise)

 

[TECNOMODEL]

I did this exercise. I wanted to know how it is...
(I think I did less disaster than the first exercise)

a little better, even if you continue to miss the projections.
as for other drawings, the altitudes of the diameters is better to put them in the views where the same are represented in section or laterally, helps understanding and avoid having to hunt the treasure to find the quota.

I correct myself, it is not the projection that is wrong, it is the threaded hole of the view below that is wrong.
is not visible in that projection, so it should be treated.

 

[orlluca]

the projection is wrong, does not coincide with the method indicated in the cartilage.
the diameters I would quota them in the side view, like threads.
the 20 you put in the left view indicates the thickness of the base? If you do not understand that position, it should be placed in the side view.
If you wanted to quote the length of that plan that ends on the radius is not correct, it is almost impossible to measure.
the perpendicularity with b can not indicate it on a quota, it should be indicated on the axis of the hole.
missing the width of the lower part of the piece. It can be derived from the value of the radius but I would share it to simplify life to those who build it.
I see nothing else for now.

 

[TECNOMODEL]

View attachment 55539

I meant this tolerancecan not be indicated by pointing to that depth quota.