sexy dal cam

[ZioCam]

Hello, everyone.
I'm starting to use surfcam again, but I find it woody (it doesn't even have the undo function). could you recommend a simple cam to learn and fast for mechanics?
Thank you.

 

[jacopo.villani@bridgecam.]

good morning I pray that they are part because I deal with software distribution cad/cam. in the specific esprit cam, for transparency I also decided to reveal it in my profile. However if you want to have esprit cam or see it with a technician I put myself available. I hope that this type of activity that is free demonstration can be proposed in the group, I am new in the forum. : richiedi demo

 

[cacciatorino]

good morning I pray that they are part because I deal with software distribution cad/cam. in the specific esprit cam, for transparency I also decided to reveal it in my profile. However if you want to have esprit cam or see it with a technician I put myself available. I hope that this type of activity that is free demonstration can be proposed in the group, I am new in the forum. : richiedi demo

Hello, well arrived!
generally in the forum you prefer posts where discussions come about technical aspects rather than staying at a demo on an external site as you did. so for example, you could write that the software you represent has the "undo" function. you can still talk about your software without problems; The important thing is to explain, as you did correctly, that you're part of it.
then you would do what you like if you put in your signature the company site you work for (see mine, which automatically appears under all posts).

Thank you, and good Sunday.

 

[ale47p]

I always used powermill. among all ex-delcam software is what has improved over time more.
undo never put it...we will see in the future... in the last versions are rewriting (finally) even the calculation algorithms, so finally the processors work for something. macrabile to the bone. I sincerely preferred the old interface, I found it more immediate, but "so things go, so they have to go..." Luckily everything is very customizable. So no problem.

the choice of the cam depends obviously also on what you need, what pieces you need to fresare (always that you only talk about milling machine...right?). What machines do you have? What control?
what I know is very strong in the 5 axes, even continuously, I have always made molds.

What's wrong with you? do you or do you send them?

 

[ZioCam]

I always used powermill. among all ex-delcam software is what has improved over time more.
undo never put it...we will see in the future... in the last versions are rewriting (finally) even the calculation algorithms, so finally the processors work for something. macrabile to the bone. I sincerely preferred the old interface, I found it more immediate, but "so things go, so they have to go..." Luckily everything is very customizable. So no problem.

the choice of the cam depends obviously also on what you need, what pieces you need to fresare (always that you only talk about milling machine...right?). What machines do you have? What control?
what I know is very strong in the 5 axes, even continuously, I have always made molds.

What's wrong with you? do you or do you send them?

I'm starting a collaboration, so I still know little. for now I have 3d from solidworks already made from which to pull out the posts with the cam. trimmings 3 axes control fanuc, if not erro.

 

[jacopo.villani@bridgecam.]

Hello, well arrived!
generally in the forum you prefer posts where discussions come about technical aspects rather than staying at a demo on an external site as you did. so for example, you could write that the software you represent has the "undo" function. you can still talk about your software without problems; The important thing is to explain, as you did correctly, that you're part of it.
then you would do what you like if you put in your signature the company site you work for (see mine, which automatically appears under all posts).

Thank you, and good Sunday.

thank you for the good Sunday tips!

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

I'm starting a collaboration, so I still know little. for now I have 3d from solidworks already made from which to pull out the posts with the cam. trimmings 3 axes control fanuc, if not erro.

I am convinced that moving geometries from software to software can generate problems too often. If you expect to work a lot with geometries from solidworks I suggest you choose a cam that can work in that environment. I use solidcam, but the possible solutions are many.

 

[jacopo.villani@bridgecam.]

I'm starting a collaboration, so I still know little. for now I have 3d from solidworks already made from which to pull out the posts with the cam. trimmings 3 axes control fanuc, if not erro.

you see that surfcam is a cool package for general mechanics according to me is a good cam.
what I know is that esprit cam has the undo key! but see that it will also have surfcam :d, if you do work for the general mechanics 2.5 esprit cam can simplify your life.
esprit works for features and processes so save the technology to unleash it on always different details, then import the data from the features from solidwork, moreover if you look for simplicity; the latest version has the "awareness of the machine" and the automatic calculation of the connections. during the calculation of the routes in fact the calculation takes into account everything; tools type of machine and various equipment.

this is a photo of the new interface the place because for many it is a novelty.. I forgot that many of the internal cad functions have been revised and updated compared to previous versions.

 

[Kekkone]

good morning, answer aside also my, who have been hypermill user for almost 10 years...
try to evaluate, even by making a tour on the open mind site, the possibilities that this software offers.
is certified by solidworks, so there is perfectly integrated, it has the possibility to create all geometries, and has a very steep learning curve, easy access to cycles and commands, intuitive and work (also) for features that speed up work in an impressive way.
takes into account all the encumbrances, brackets, clamps, tool holders and various areas.
online assistance then helps you a lot being made up of really passionate and competent people providing advice that go beyond the problem to solve.
post processors tested for years of use by customers of the most diverse categories.
only costs a little, but now a mechanical company without a good cam is anachronistic thread... .
Good Sunday!

 

[falonef]

Hi.
I've heard very well about tebis even if I don't know him and I'm not on the side.

by us prefer more gibbscam than the cat's cam v5 ...

 

[mastromarco]

Hello, everyone.
I'm starting to use surfcam again, but I find it woody (it doesn't even have the undo function). could you recommend a simple cam to learn and fast for mechanics?
Thank you.

I am also on the side, but I decided to be, in the sense that when I wanted to choose a cam to propose I evaluated the products on the market in addition to those with whom I worked personally (combate with those mentioned and in more nx).
I chose sprutcam because it is innovative for the extreme simplicity of use deriving from the interactivity of fact move, selections, shoots, move directly to video without opening many windows. you have built-in simulator and always takes into account the kinematics of the fact machine he proposes you the most convenient position for your workmanship in case of positioned, in addition to the fact that it simulates, calculates and optimizes the links between the processes. Finally I am pleased to say that it works on nurbs as only another cam (quoted above) makes with results of movement tools much more fluid and with less stains, consequently lower working times and better finishes.

The development of the European Union is therefore also an added value.

 

[TECNOMODEL]

Hi.
I've heard very well about tebis even if I don't know him and I'm not on the side.

by us prefer more gibbscam than the cat's cam v5 ...

tebis is the ferrari of the cams, unfortunately also the price is that of a ferrari o_o
once properly configured with all the math of the machine on which you will go to work you have the certainty to 99% (1% error of the operator you cannot delete) of not having collisions.

 

[ale47p]

I'm starting a collaboration, so I still know little. for now I have 3d from solidworks already made from which to pull out the posts with the cam. trimmings 3 axes control fanuc, if not erro.

Well, from the 3 axes, just don't use a 90's cam the compatibility of the maths is important, for that I asked you.

tebis is the ferrari of the cams, unfortunately also the price is that of a ferrari o_o
once properly configured with all the math of the machine on which you will go to work you have the certainty to 99% (1% error of the operator you cannot delete) of not having collisions.

even in powermill you can, and I think in all mid/high-end cams...
take into account that you don't always send machine processing directly from the cam, sometimes after post-processed you have to make repetitions, shifts, scale factors, specular. all these things, if made by the master program on board machine are not controllable from the cam directly, then a simulator type vericut makes the difference. really then you no longer miss a shot. Of course, if you make a 3-axle die, colliding control doesn't need anything, if you crash, you were thinking about the flaw instead of the frieze.. .

from what I know one of the advantages of tebis (as in powermill) is to be able to fresare (wanting) stl along with the surfaces simultaneously on the same model. I had the pleasure of dealing with a person who used tebis and now uses powermill (a moldist), I talked to him after 2 years who worked there, and he wouldn't come back. By the way, the cam I used even if there are holes, imperfections, etc...he rubs everything...

then, I repeat: if one needs only to make some pockets, quarry, hole, thread... well he doesn't need anything...

 

[Kekkone]

in the end, if you do not make incredible processes like blades, blisk or various special diavoleries that do in few, for the general mechanics the systems are equal, what makes the real difference is the one who is behind the screen. . .

 

[lucisimo]

Good morning.
I reconnect to this discussion to ask for suggestions on software cam.
in the company where work is considering the purchase of a cam (2.5 + 3 axes) and we have 2 possibilities: visi and solidcam.
visi has been proposed by our cnc machine supplier, solidcam we are evaluating it because we use solidworks in company for 3d design and modeling and work in the same software environment and with the same interface is definitely attractive.
considering that we do relatively "simple" milling processes (in the sense that we do not work complex surfaces or geometries), do you kindly tell me which of the two cams can be more suitable according to your experience?
Thank you in advance.

 

[TECNOMODEL]

Good morning.
I reconnect to this discussion to ask for suggestions on software cam.
in the company where work is considering the purchase of a cam (2.5 + 3 axes) and we have 2 possibilities: visi and solidcam.
visi has been proposed by our cnc machine supplier, solidcam we are evaluating it because we use solidworks in company for 3d design and modeling and work in the same software environment and with the same interface is definitely attractive.
considering that we do relatively "simple" milling processes (in the sense that we do not work complex surfaces or geometries), do you kindly tell me which of the two cams can be more suitable according to your experience?
Thank you in advance.

I don't know visi, but if you use solidworks I would appreciate taking his cam.
the possibility of interassociating between the files is a great thing, if I make a change to a particular I don't need to export it again, re-import it in the cam file and re-make the work.
I'm fine.

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

I agree with @tecnomodel . having an integrated cam with modeling software shelters from all geometries interchange issues. Moreover solidcam is completely integrated in solidworks, so in case of geometric model modification it is extremely simple to update the processing procedures. and then I find that solidcam has excellent assistance.

 

[jacopo.villani@bridgecam.]

Good morning.
I reconnect to this discussion to ask for suggestions on software cam.
in the company where work is considering the purchase of a cam (2.5 + 3 axes) and we have 2 possibilities: visi and solidcam.
visi has been proposed by our cnc machine supplier, solidcam we are evaluating it because we use solidworks in company for 3d design and modeling and work in the same software environment and with the same interface is definitely attractive.
considering that we do relatively "simple" milling processes (in the sense that we do not work complex surfaces or geometries), do you kindly tell me which of the two cams can be more suitable according to your experience?
Thank you in advance.

you can discuss whether you have integrated or not the software falls into the cam and the advantages or disadvantages that you can have.. But I think it is a priority to talk about the choice of the cam system according to the processes and details that characterize the production. in my opinion visi and solidcam I see them well in the mold sector with complex surfaces but for 2.5 ax and 3 ax machining for relatively simple details there are other software such as rhinocam the autodesk suites and other products also of the true!!! 2 point people and assistance must have a good team for assistance especially for the automation of post-processors. lucisimo six abruzzese I am of part in the judgment because I am a commercial technician in auton systems the main distributor esprit cam in Italy, we opened a seat to chieti with a technician and a commercial if I can be useful to you to evaluate this solution this is our site www.autonsistemi.it

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

you can discuss whether you have integrated or not the software falls into the cam and the advantages or disadvantages that you can have.. But I think it is a priority to talk about the choice of the cam system according to the processes and details that characterize the production. in my opinion visi and solidcam I see them well in the mold sector with complex surfaces but for 2.5 ax and 3 ax machining for relatively simple details there are other software such as rhinocam the autodesk suites and other products also of the true!!! 2 point people and assistance must have a good team for assistance especially for the automation of post-processors. lucisimo six abruzzese I am of part in the judgment because I am a commercial technician in auton systems the main distributor esprit cam in Italy, we opened a seat to chieti with a technician and a commercial if I can be useful to you to evaluate this solution this is our site www.autonsistemi.it

Just pull the water to your mill, but I agree with you only partially. just that the cam has the necessary features, but being able to choose between more products the integrated solution wins at low hands. even if geometries of @lucisimo were the maximum of simplicity (and they are usually simple only when you reason in abstract, then they complicate, and then as!) the fact of moving them from one environment to another always presents incognite. then wanting to take into account the revisions of the project, we imagine to change some quota to the piece, which in a solid modeler often happens, solidcam recognizes the variation and signals, updating the selection of the geometries.
As for how you see visi and solidcam you should review the information you have available. I don't know him, I know he's got a history in the automotive, but I don't know anymore. Solidcam is a modular system that can be cut out for customer needs, from 2.5x to 5x milling, turning, milling turning, swiss machining and more.
if you @lucisimo know solidcam I guess he's already had contact with them directly. . .

 

[Kekkone]

even to talk about it.... if you don't have a cam yet, so you have to start from scratch, you already use solidworks to build your models... the answer is discounted, for the reasons mentioned above that I share in full.
user word hypermill!