"this document contains parts in regression: solving them?" what does it mean?

[reggio]

hi, lately we happen to see this message at the opening of assemblies

"This document contains parts and/or assemblies saved in a regression state: solve them completely? "

What does that mean?
What causes it?
What am I supposed to do?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Inserimento indietro

Ho un assieme che all'apertura mi da questo messaggio. Questo documento contiene altri parti e/o assiemi salvati in stato di inserimento indietro. Reinserirli in avanti? Gli dici di sì e funziona regolarmente. C'è un modo per capire quale è il componente con stato di inserimento indietro?

www.cad3d.it

stato inserimento

Houston ho un problema dopo la modifica di un componente di un assieme , ogni volta che apro lo stesso assieme mi dice:" Questo documento contiene altri parti e/o assiemi salvati in stato di inserimento indietro. Reinserirli in avanti?" ogni volta dico si e salvo l' assieme ma il prob si...

www.cad3d.it

stato di regressione: cosa fare?

ciao a tutti ho una curiosità da chiedere: un paio di volte mi è appasra una finestra (vedi immagine) con la scritta che uno dei componenti è in stato di regressione e l'assieme era al momento inaccessibile ,"bloccando" tutto il programma,l'unica soluzione era di chiudere completamente...

www.cad3d.it

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

mark it, for any research, that the phrase in English is one of the components of this assembly is in rollback state

 

[reggio]

Thank you, I have not yet understood what we have "registered" ... in theory nothing
He doesn't give directions to the culprit... you have to go find him in all parts and assimilate...

I imagine that saying "yes" brings the bar back to place and saving it resolves... but ...

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

by clicking on: Save list in files/prints/copy does not indicate the incriminated file?

 

[reggio]

by clicking on: Save list in files/prints/copy does not indicate the incriminated file?

? "Save list in files/prints/copy" which? Do you appear in those cases? I don't see it...

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

before your image

 

[reggio]

...you're right, actually opening my eyes ... already on the first screen reported the incriminating component

But if I open it, I don't see anything retrocessed or wrong...
... by the way, the colleague does not appear the problem, to me yes ...

The mystery is inflated...

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

But if I open it, I don't see anything retrocessed or wrong...

is a thing I read on the English forum, if I did not understand badly it should be enough to raise and lower the insertion bar as to tell him - see, I put back to place the regression, no more break the cycisbei-

the mystery is broken...

that the great Jacob has mercy on your soul son

 

[reggio]

is a thing I read on the English forum, if I did not understand badly it should be enough to raise and lower the insertion bar as to tell him - see, I put back to place the regression, no more break the cycisbei-

and in fact now it breaks more the cicisbei... apart from an equation error that to me from and to the colleague no ... but I solve by making him save to him

Thank you Massivonweizen!

 

[IronMike87]

since we're almost in topic... Does anyone ever use the freezing bar?

I do not use it because in power I must be able to change everything from the first operations, but maybe for you it could be useful.
Maybe it avoids such cases

https://help.solidworks.com/2021/english/solidworks/sldworks/c_feature_freeze.htm?verredirect=1

 

[reggio]

since we're almost in topic... Does anyone ever use the freezing bar?

I do not use it because in power I must be able to change everything from the first operations, but maybe for you it could be useful.
Maybe it avoids such cases

https://help.solidworks.com/2021/english/solidworks/sldworks/c_feature_freeze.htm?verredirect=1

interesting... but I expect you to feel massive... https://help.solidworks.com/2016/it...e.htm?id=4da03a7cc4884d28868791630ca7411e#pg0

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I use it when I make parts tables with challenging reconstruction; It seems to me, I don't put my hand on fire, that the design gains in performance.
But more than anything I do not remember its existence and therefore do not use it in other contexts where it could be useful for example in the assemblies; If you have already defined parts, we think, for example, of the pins or commercial components such as bearings or vices, it can be useful and perhaps on a few hundred parts having half in that situation makes the difference.

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

since we're almost in topic... Does anyone ever use the freezing bar?

I do not use it because in power I must be able to change everything from the first operations, but maybe for you it could be useful.
Maybe it avoids such cases

https://help.solidworks.com/2021/english/solidworks/sldworks/c_feature_freeze.htm?verredirect=1

I don't see the freezing bar as a limit. you can activate/disable/reposition easily. I use it because I have to deal with particular geometries where ctrl+b may not update correctly, so I have the vice to use ctrl+q, and in such case freeze features which I am sure speeds me enough.

 

[re_solidworks]

...you're right, actually opening my eyes ... already on the first screen reported the incriminating component

But if I open it, I don't see anything retrocessed or wrong...
... by the way, the colleague does not appear the problem, to me yes ...

The mystery is inflated...

hi, actually, among the many things that work so far, this message never came out without a reason. your colleague probably bypassed the problem by telling swx not to ask him "yes" again. If you find the part in regression, read its name, close everything and go open the part by yourself, you will find it in regression (secure!). at this point lower the insert bar, save and if in place.