• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

design of particular

  • Thread starter Thread starter Martakynghi
  • Start date Start date
Look, I found the original design. ...Screenshot_20200128_232916.webpassonometry, views projected with edges not in sight and quotas.
In my opinion, there are no quotas on this design. missing the cl and the distance between the holes.
it is known that the drawings on the books are simplified to make the ingenuity to those who read.
 
Look, I found the original design. ...View attachment 56044assonometry, views projected with edges not in sight and quotas.
In my opinion, there are no quotas on this design. missing the cl and the distance between the holes.
it is known that the drawings on the books are simplified to make the ingenuity to those who read.
would be to be laughed also on the quotation of this design (is it from a book? ).
that 36 from center hole to edge shouts revenge:
the holes are missing.
 
Look, I found the original design. ...View attachment 56044assonometry, views projected with edges not in sight and quotas.
In my opinion, there are no quotas on this design. missing the cl and the distance between the holes.
it is known that the drawings on the books are simplified to make the ingenuity to those who read.
Where did you find him?
 
would be to be laughed also on the quotation of this design (is it from a book? ).
that 36 from center hole to edge shouts revenge:
the holes are missing.
comes from a book (not accurate) drawing Screenshot_20200129_150708.webpbut you know how many books bring wrong, missing or overtaken things. ....
 
Look, I found the original design. ...View attachment 56044assonometry, views projected with edges not in sight and quotas.
In my opinion, there are no quotas on this design. missing the cl and the distance between the holes.
it is known that the drawings on the books are simplified to make the ingenuity to those who read.
Hello, is the American view right?
 
true, but I'm not finding myself with the views. on the left should not go the projection of particular in front, on the left the one from above and on the right side?
 
on the left should not go the projection of particular in front, on the left the one from above and on the right side?
This is the scheme they teach at school, but no matter how you have views as long as they are projected correctly.
also the front, plant and lateral definition have no meaning because a three-dimensional object has no specific layout.
Tell me where you found this design, please? Would you have any more?
to your first message a hint of greeting would have been appreciated, and would not hurt a small presentation
 
true, but I'm not finding myself with the views. on the left should not go the projection of particular in front, on the left the one from above and on the right side?
the projection direction makes the European or American method. where you put them does not hit. at school they show you something "basic to start" but it doesn't end there.
 
I also wrote the same thing, then I read on the profile that the worker does and uses the cam... Man, I guess you saw some drawings.
I don't know. Unfortunately, I know so many operators who don't know how to read the 2d anymore and give it the solid in hand and do the program like that.
 
I don't know. Unfortunately, I know so many operators who don't know how to read the 2d anymore and give it the solid in hand and do the program like that.
I didn't think about it. In fact it could be also so, but if you do not read the drawing how you do to understand what to work, what before and what after, what tolerances you have to ensure. and then while you work some drawing you happen to look at it, maybe because in the workshop you question the positioning in the car or maybe because you use them as a tablecloth during lunch.
Well, we wait for him to tell us.
 
I don't know. Unfortunately, I know so many operators who don't know how to read the 2d anymore and give it the solid in hand and do the program like that.
I hope I never make a few special workshops where such operators work, otherwise how do they comply with the tolerances that I design? :sneaky:
 
trust the precision of the tool machine.
but it means working with the maximum precision available of the machine also parts that do not require it by raising it to the cost.
in practice to spy on 4 foundation plates of a frame instead of making a single pass with the cutter for roughness to have a roughness 6.3 and a minimum of flatness do two past (fine roughness + finish) with 2 different cutters to get roughness 1.6.
may be, I do not question; or is the program done and then adapts the operator to the machine?
 
but it means working with the maximum precision available of the machine also parts that do not require it by raising it to the cost.
in practice to spy on 4 foundation plates of a frame instead of making a single pass with the cutter for roughness to have a roughness 6.3 and a minimum of flatness do two past (fine roughness + finish) with 2 different cutters to get roughness 1.6.
may be, I do not question; or is the program done and then adapts the operator to the machine?
Usually in these conditions, they would take a bigger lamb, they put in fress and they twist everything. Then they turn and brake by blowing away the excess....
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top