ambient display together

[Marco Moretti]

good afternoon, I would like to ask how it is possible to "filtrate" one or more parts in an environment together, that is to be able to view the progress of a structure once completed without having to resort to the visibility option of each part on the browser.
Thank you.

 

[Lorenz578]

good afternoon, I would like to ask how it is possible to "filtrate" one or more parts in an environment together, that is to be able to view the progress of a structure once completed without having to resort to the visibility option of each part on the browser.
Thank you.

Hi, I've read your request a bit of times, but I just can't understand what you want to do.
You want to filter parts, you mean you want to see only those parts that you select?
because then you talk about structure of the browser, but I don't understand the connection.
Sorry.

 

[Marco Moretti]

hello you are right, I expressed myself very badly; what I would like to do is to be able to display only parts that make up a set. In the specific case, I designed a cover structure consisting of main and secondary elements designed in part files and inserted in a file of combination with chronological order (from the first main beam, to the last secondary) and now at work I asked if it was possible to display the main structures (made from parts inserted before) and not the secondary ones and/or vice versa, without having to resort to the option visibility.
I hope I was able to clarify... thank you

 

[Lorenz578]

hello you are right, I expressed myself very badly; what I would like to do is to be able to display only parts that make up a set. In the specific case, I designed a cover structure consisting of main and secondary elements designed in part files and inserted in a file of combination with chronological order (from the first main beam, to the last secondary) and now at work I asked if it was possible to display the main structures (made from parts inserted before) and not the secondary ones and/or vice versa, without having to resort to the option visibility.
I hope I was able to clarify... thank you

just to understand, how did you structure the main axieme? because I can't understand the difference between main and secondary elements.
I try to understand.
together general "a"
are there only parts within this group, or have you made subaxis with other parts?
I didn't understand how you structured the tree

 

[Marco Moretti]

just to understand, how did you structure the main axieme? because I can't understand the difference between main and secondary elements.
I try to understand.
together general "a"
are there only parts within this group, or have you made subaxis with other parts?
I didn't understand how you structured the tree

Here I am... thank you for the availability.... I have only inserted parts in a file of assembly that you can see in the attached image, the orange-colored parts constitute the one I mentioned as the main structure while the yellow parts are the secondary structure but this is only a way of exposing things and definitely for that we do not understand. . .
both orange and yellow parts are single parts, no sub-assieme.
the orange parts were chronologically inserted before the parts in yellow.
is it possible to display only the orange parts without having to remove the visibility to each part in yellow?
I hope I've been clearer

 

[Lorenz578]

Here I am... thank you for the availability.... I have only inserted parts in a file of assembly that you can see in the attached image, the orange-colored parts constitute the one I mentioned as the main structure while the yellow parts are the secondary structure but this is only a way of exposing things and definitely for that we do not understand. . .
both orange and yellow parts are single parts, no sub-assieme.
the orange parts were chronologically inserted before the parts in yellow.
is it possible to display only the orange parts without having to remove the visibility to each part in yellow?
I hope I've been clearer

Clearly.
I had understood that you called primary and secondary structure not referring to the inventor parts, but to the real structure.
select the parts in orange, button dx, island.
If you had created two subaxis (main structure and secondary structure), it would have been even faster.
if you want to go back to review all the complete axieme, always go to the tree of the parts, representations, default view, default, dx key on default, all the visible elements

 

[Marco Moretti]

Clearly.
I had understood that you called primary and secondary structure not referring to the inventor parts, but to the real structure.
select the parts in orange, button dx, island.
If you had created two subaxis (main structure and secondary structure), it would have been even faster.
if you want to go back to review all the complete axieme, always go to the tree of the parts, representations, default view, default, dx key on default, all the visible elements

thanks lorenz578 often complicates life in an attempt to make it easier... In the end, we understand.
Well I didn't know the island command which would then be the perfect opposite of visibility ... a bit slender at this point next time I will follow your advice and create sub-assiemi
thanks again for availability

 

[Lorenz578]

thanks lorenz578 often complicates life in an attempt to make it easier... In the end, we understand.
Well I didn't know the island command which would then be the perfect opposite of visibility ... a bit slender at this point next time I will follow your advice and create sub-assiemi
thanks again for availability

No.
I come from a long experience with solidworks and is the same command.
creating subaxis is as useful as in your case when you need to divide the general structure, into two main and secondary substructures.
it becomes all leaner and more immediate in the editing phase, or with operations like what you want to do. It had been a set, isolate everything in a blow without having to select the individual parts.
Hi.