folded sheet, gradation plates

[tanticapelli]

hello to all, I open a new question to which I have not yet been able to find answer.

Sending sheet coating typical of building enclosures.

I press that the sheet is "ingenierized", in the sense that once flattened it can be thrown directly into laser cutting and bent.

is parameterized in order to preserve its external dimensions also varying sheet thickness and rear bending radius.

the problem is the small triangles that I can't build without mistakenly sending the functions (and already work normally with "reconstruction (active control of the advanced body)" disabled).

in the file you find in the annex I have adopted some stratagems not to mistakenly send the feature manager and thus succeed in flattening the sheet, but unfortunately the flattened presence "defects" in the meeting points of the folds that to the one who produces the plates creates problems (it must be to manually manipulate the dxf of the flattened to eliminate these defects).

I send screenshot to make you understand what I mean by "defects" at the meeting points of the parishioners.

the question is therefore how to obtain a sheet with this foggia and not susceptible to stretch of the external silhouette to the vary of bending radius and/or thickness obtaining a flattened without defects.

Thank you.

 

[xxfast]

I didn't understand exactly what you want to get.
on 2 feet I can tell you that the bending parameters should be revised.
I got this in five minutes.
working on it I think you can get the result that desuideri, but you have to change the functions used for the creation of the sheets.

 

[tanticapelli]

I didn't understand exactly what you want to get.
on 2 feet I can tell you that the bending parameters should be revised.
I got this in five minutes.
working on it I think you can get the result that desuideri, but you have to change the functions used for the creation of the sheets.View attachment 64717

I imagine that the problem of flattened with the encounters of the "sporty" folds depends on how I build the functions.
However it is important that in building them "both parameterized in order to preserve its external dimensions of each stool also varying sheet thickness and/or rear bending radius. "

Forgive me but from your screenshot you do not appreciate any kind of detail. Could you quote more specifically?

Thank you.

 

[xxfast]

I'll put the attached file.
I repeat.
working on the sheet functions you can get the result , I did only a quick test.
Bye.

 

[xxfast]

Bye.
Here's the file.
Let us know if it's okay.... .

 

[tanticapelli]

Bye.
Here's the file.
Let us know if it's okay.... .

Thank you, but I can't open it. I have the 2019 version, this file with what version was produced?

 

[xxfast]

Thank you, but I can't open it. I have the 2019 version, this file with what version was produced?

I had seen you use 2019, but I use 2020.
From this point of view, I can't help you. . .

 

[tanticapelli]

I also called into question a paid advice to try to solve this problem but they were also great.
Did any of you manage to get over something?
I'm sorry I couldn't open the xxfast example. .

thank you all.. .

 

[tanticapelli]

Bye.
Here's the file.
Let us know if it's okay.... .

Hi.
I let another person open the file.
Unfortunately I see that you failed to close the joints of the stools in the flattening and moreover you have parameterized the sheet so that they can not import useful quotas in the design and the outer shape should be deformed in case of change of radius/spink at the back.
I am equally happy, at least now I am absolutely sure that it is no longer worth losing time on this aspect.

Thank you.

so many hairs

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

to view future version files you can use edrawings (last version).@tanticapelli , in this specific case you will not have the historian but you can check if the file @xxfast corresponds to your need to find a way to make you explain

 

[tanticapelli]

to view future version files you can use edrawings (last version).@tanticapelli , in this specific case you will not have the historian but you can check if the file @xxfast corresponds to your need to find a way to make you explain

I thank you for the advice but I opened it from that of the assistance that used solidworks 2021 and made me videos where you saw the structures of the functions and the most important peculiarities of the file.
thanks to everyone again this time

 

[xxfast]

Hi.
I let another person open the file.
Unfortunately I see that you failed to close the joints of the stools in the flattening and moreover you have parameterized the sheet so that they can not import useful quotas in the design and the outer shape should be deformed in case of change of radius/spink at the back.
I am equally happy, at least now I am absolutely sure that it is no longer worth losing time on this aspect.

Thank you.

according to the geomatria you want to get, you can not close the joints, unless you change something compared to the file you have attached.