• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

infrared heating

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vittorio
  • Start date Start date
Hello.

understanding the various perplexities about the actual amount of declared energy saving; I am not persuaded of those related to dust because it seems to me that normal daily cleaning should minimize the problem. Although my expertise in the matter is limited to information on the company’s website and other networkable assimilates, I think I will continue to “currise” on this system in particular on the economic aspect.

I can't believe
 
I add:
I certainly have an economical mindset from housewives, but this story of 110% I don't understand it.
How is it possible that the state will return all the expenses incurred to improve the energy class of my house and, cherry on the cake, it also gives me a 10% :unsure: where is the trick?
It would be like going to the supermarket, filling the cart of every god, and at the cash register, beyond free, pay me 10% of the total I have in my cart?
I feel a torpedo.. height buttocks
the additional 10% would be served, to compensate for the accessory costs and the implied financing that banks withdraw credit from contracting companies. ..as we know banks never do anything for free.
the problem is that at the present time at best the banks, thanks to the increase of interest rates occurred in these 2 years, give at most 96-97%.
who will have the "luck" to bring to completion the works will then have to put in own pocket the remaining. . .
I am also aware that for some time the banks only accept the transfer of the credit referred to the driving operations (coupling) , excluding the trainees.
 
I have a trusted friend who tried in 110%,
It was far-sighted and it was one of the first to ask.
to said it was a traumatic experience for the amount of documents that he had to provide during the course of work, including the various catalytic updates that he had to do to be in order on the commas of irregularities, which is very common in all our houses.
the most widespread are the agiable but not inhabitable premises.
In connection with the request of 110% my friend retired and, according to him, it was fundamental because he had the time to follow all the bureaucratic phases.
impossible if you are engaged in a work activity because you should delegate a professional with additional costs not recognized.
However the work came out perfectly and, being one of the first, did not have delays on the supply of the materials, although.. just for free it was not, because some interventions did not fall in 110%
In my area I see many buildings with unfinished scaffolding and coverings, they seem abandoned to themselves and do not see work because they lack materials.
Who knows? How will it end

ps: the friend in question also made a 20kw photovoltaic system
until enel did not give blessing by giving the ok could not use the energy produced.
to do this.. It took almost 6 months, with blasphemies of pickles, to be able to use the plant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am interested in the matter (of course).
but above all what is reported by victorious.
how could your friend not use his plant until the benefit of enel?
that could not connect to the line, I understand it, but use it for yourself? Maybe the plant was not designed in this regard?
 
I am interested in the matter (of course).
but above all what is reported by victorious.
how could your friend not use his plant until the benefit of enel?
that could not connect to the line, I understand it, but use it for yourself? Maybe the plant was not designed in this regard?
Maybe it's also a technical question, if it's 20 kw, it's a lot of power, assuming that it's 5 kw, the remaining 15 where you put them if you didn't connect on the net? I'm a mechanic. :
 
I am interested in the matter (of course).
but above all what is reported by victorious.
how could your friend not use his plant until the benefit of enel?
that could not connect to the line, I understand it, but use it for yourself? Maybe the plant was not designed in this regard?
no absolutely was designed right.
It has a battery pack proportional to 20kw, it does not intend to sell it to enel even because if it does not use it for its personal use. .that which enters the network with the project of 110% is absolutely not paid.
therefore the goal is to accumulate and use what it produces.
Of course, you have to be connected to the enel network because in the case of bad prolonged days the batteries run out and you can't stay without power.
said that.. if there is no blessing enel you can not even use what you accumulate.
And then... He had to make an enel contract for a 10kw counter against the 3kw before.
the contract of the counter must be proportional to the photovoltaic system and of course the fixed costs increase compared to the 3kw.. extra in the case of beautiful days with sun and full batteries. enel takes the current for free
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I read that there are plants that can work both in stand alone mode and connected to the network.
for "stand alone" operation there is no need for enel permission, maybe someone "in the field" can confirm or deny!
 
yes, are the plants called to island totally independent from the electricity network for which no special authorizations are required: here get more information.
in the document you read, consider the paragraph: ".. adherents or integrated into the roofs of the buildings with the same inclination and the same orientation of the ground on which they are installed" exceeded by a recent legislation for which there are no longer these constraints unless you are in particular areas, for example parks, old town or areas of particular landscape interest.
 
@terastore thanks for the info
Of course there are many constraints to contribute to energy alternatives.
becomes a real puzzle to face them.
if the body of environmental goods existed during the Bronze Age, they would also forbid the stilts.
 
If I can give advice, perhaps denied by those most experienced, I would avoid the isolation made inside the house, it causes in most cases, mold training! Hell in your case I see it hard.. you can't make the outer coat.. you can't put photovoltaic panels.. You just have to put a small nuclear power plant! :
a colleague told me that he made a plaster for thermal insulation inside the house... having exposed bricks outside. the product is called "bronya" and guarantees the insulation that would offer a coat of many cm and simultaneously is breathable, to avoid molds. The reverse of the medal is that it costs a fucilage... but it is the only solution for those with exposed bricks.
 
a colleague told me that he made a plaster for thermal insulation inside the house... having exposed bricks outside. the product is called "bronya" and guarantees the insulation that would offer a coat of many cm and simultaneously is breathable, to avoid molds. The reverse of the medal is that it costs a fucilage... but it is the only solution for those with exposed bricks.
Hi.
I had informed myself at the time, I abandoned the idea because there are no certifications that guarantee this insulation. The lambda coefficient is not guaranteed by these nano technologies and no one has yet declared it with certainty including bronya.
There is a risk that, in subsequent checks, does not recognize this technology and 110% is challenged with money return + sanctions.
Who would risk spending a fortune with the nightmare of this risk?
I also believe that there is no undertaking that accepts this doubt

discussions and opinions
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top