progettazione ed ai

[mir]

ask if the robots can pay you the pension:d:d

 

[mistermaster]

The domotic is not intelligent, it is not that by planning the start of the washing machine at a certain time that you turn around at home, a few minutes before, to see if you have forgotten some dirty socks, that would be true to
We have electronic circuits and various algorithms that repeat to parrot predetermined actions, see also the various bots on social media
It seems to me that the current predictions on the advent of the axe resemble the futuristic dreams that were made in the 60's, like: flying cars, houses on mars, travel in time, instead we turn again on rubber, and indeed we are back refusing electric motors (invented at the end of 1800) for our cars, and we call it future

 

[mistermaster]

Now I was looking for news, and I found one of the supers, so to speak, judge you https://www.rainews.it/video/2023/0...gas-76c0b141-834c-43e9-be73-912a1ff79bb4.html

 

[wert]

The domotic is not intelligent, it is not that by planning the start of the washing machine at a certain time that you turn around at home, a few minutes before, to see if you have forgotten some dirty socks, that would be true to
We have electronic circuits and various algorithms that repeat to parrot predetermined actions, see also the various bots on social media
It seems to me that the current predictions on the advent of the axe resemble the futuristic dreams that were made in the 60's, like: flying cars, houses on mars, travel in time, instead we turn again on rubber, and indeed we are back refusing electric motors (invented at the end of 1800) for our cars, and we call it future

You're right. Domotics aren't smart. but it is still a relatively new technology, on which, at the beginning, everyone nurtured perplexity, as well as on computers, on the internet and on mobile phones.
I wanted to stress that making negative comments on a new technology is often not wise.
I think that what is allowed to us to see today is but an appetizer of what is its great potential.
I wish you were right about the fact that it will never come true to the but I fear unfortunately that your forecast is wrong.
I do not say all concept workers, but a significant percentage of them could suffer the negative effects of this innovation. to be meaningful and to have relapses on the economy, it would be enough an 8/10%. . .
Do you think that, over a decade (perhaps even less), the aisle cannot remove the work to an 8/10% of the concept workers? I'd like to make a mistake, but unfortunately I think I'm...

 

[mir]

We never had to deal with self-learning... these ai grow exponentially. we talk about months or a few years for everlasting feedback.

 

[TETRASTORE]

The domotic is not intelligent, it is not that by planning the start of the washing machine at a certain time that you turn around at home, a few minutes before, to see if you have forgotten some dirty socks, that would be true to

I agree.
the aai uses algorithms created for now by humans so the final result is according to the knowledge of who processes them.
while for the texts are already at an excellent level; Try to ask for a commercial letter as if you would ask a secretary, or a fairy tale for grandchildren or a letter for the lawyer; In these cases the results are exciting because it gives you outstanding results in your language substantially free of both grammatical and syntax errors, making changes in real time based on voice instructions such as for example. "Can you write me a commercial letter for customers where I communicate a 10% increase on my services due to inflation?" and in real time writes it unexceptionable, at least in the evidence I did.
As for excel macros you can request to write one that performs a series of functions and the simplest generates working but with a code that needs to be optimized.
what would also like to me, being I reductivecentric, would be to provide final torque data, reduction ratio, output turns, morphology and type of application and get a gearbox already calculated, designed, complete with manual, spare parts lists, constructive drawings and, why not cnc programs; I ask too?
we tried with openai.com but it was limited to calculating the turns, torque and power input and output power entering then into a loop where it repeated the same things.
I repeat, it is not a limit of the system but simply, until now in this field, there has not yet been a strong contribution of experts in the field, but this does not mean that it will not happen.
the development of the aid follows, as all innovations, the economic aspect, preferring first those that can offer remuneration benefits in the short term, but continue to evolve also in self-learning.

I do not say all concept workers, but a significant percentage of them could suffer the negative effects of this innovation. to be meaningful and to have relapses on the economy, it would be enough an 8/10%. . .
Do you think that, over a decade (perhaps even less), the aisle cannot remove the work to an 8/10% of the concept workers? I'd like to make a mistake, but unfortunately I think I'm...

I think it will not take away work, but it will degrade it according to a trend that has already begun for at least thirty years; try to think of an engineer coming out of the university in the 1960s by comparing him to a neolaureate omologist today; the first was highly sought after, appreciated and well paid for his knowledge that in a short time completed with experience, the current increasingly frequent is marginalized and subpaid.
considers that the current development has produced many jobs that, unfortunately, no one wants to do because underpaid or because considered not to meet their expectations; I think this phenomenon will be more and more focused.
This makes me think that in perspective most people will simply be users (consumer laws) of these innovations with products that will be released to them by pontificating the qualities like the technological bidet that also makes you the examination of urine or the car with 70 cameras and that can change color with a button.
I wonder: but no one has yet realized that we continue to produce energetic and often useless innovations without having solved the energy problem first?

 

[wert]

I agree.
the aai uses algorithms created for now by humans so the final result is according to the knowledge of who processes them.
while for the texts are already at an excellent level; Try to ask for a commercial letter as if you would ask a secretary, or a fairy tale for grandchildren or a letter for the lawyer; In these cases the results are exciting because it gives you outstanding results in your language substantially free of both grammatical and syntax errors, making changes in real time based on voice instructions such as for example. "Can you write me a commercial letter for customers where I communicate a 10% increase on my services due to inflation?" and in real time writes it unexceptionable, at least in the evidence I did.
As for excel macros you can request to write one that performs a series of functions and the simplest generates working but with a code that needs to be optimized.
what would also like to me, being I reductivecentric, would be to provide final torque data, reduction ratio, output turns, morphology and type of application and get a gearbox already calculated, designed, complete with manual, spare parts lists, constructive drawings and, why not cnc programs; I ask too?
we tried with openai.com but it was limited to calculating the turns, torque and power input and output power entering then into a loop where it repeated the same things.
I repeat, it is not a limit of the system but simply, until now in this field, there has not yet been a strong contribution of experts in the field, but this does not mean that it will not happen.
the development of the aid follows, as all innovations, the economic aspect, preferring first those that can offer remuneration benefits in the short term, but continue to evolve also in self-learning.


I think it will not take away work, but it will degrade it according to a trend that has already begun for at least twenty years; try to think of an engineer coming out of the university in the 1960s by comparing him to a neolaureate omologist today; the first was highly sought after, appreciated and well paid for his knowledge that in a short time completed with experience, the current increasingly frequent is marginalized and subpaid.
This makes me think that in perspective most people will simply be users (consumer laws) of these innovations with products that will be released to them by pontificating the qualities like the technological bidet that also makes you the examination of urine or the car with 70 cameras and that can change color with a button.
I wonder: but no one has yet realized that we continue to produce energetic and often useless innovations without having solved the energy problem first?

simply because, in the '60s he graduated a young man every 100... I who did only the professional three-year in the '70s, in my company I was considered as a winning leonardo.... I am convinced that the aisle is capable of self learning, so to evolve. Of course, he cannot support the ingenuity, human intuition, but to do certain works he will be able to do. then, as I said, happy to be wrong. . .

 

[TETRASTORE]

simply because, in the '60s he graduated a young man every 100... I who did only the professional three-year in the '70s, in my company I was considered as a winning leonardo.... I am convinced that the aisle is capable of self learning, so to evolve. Of course, he cannot support the ingenuity, human intuition, but to do certain works he will be able to do. then, as I said, happy to be wrong. . .

I agree with you, what I want to say is that in the near future who will not be able to manage the innovative processes, will not be unemployed (if you want) but will have to choose jobs in the services sector that already, if available, are not areas for various reasons more or less plausible.

 

[mir]

However the aisle has problems distinguishing the point from the comma in its own answers

in this case, for the volume of the tank of 0.205379 m3, the volume in liters would be:​

liters = 0.205379 m ³ x 1000 = 205.379 liters​

in other words 205379 liters.​

 

[mistermaster]

Before any artificial thing becomes intelligent we humans will have the readiness to have us implanted in the brain a ssd of variable dimensions, then explain the usefulness of developing one ai?

 

[mir]

I have no qualifications to tell you the difference... but they are substantial
to have the data does not mean to know how to
iai seeks solutions and interprets to give you an answer