cone development with processing

[MARCOC]

hello to all...you place a file
solidworks does not and wants to know how to develop this object (due to the indicated processing that I need to have the right cut)
Does anyone have solutions? Have you been there yet?

 

[MARCOC]

Sorry forgotten file is made with solid 2022

 

[Esselle]

If I didn't get it wrong, that's what you want to get.

my advice is to use few simple functions.

 

[pose63]

hello to all...you place a file
solidworks does not and wants to know how to develop this object (due to the indicated processing that I need to have the right cut)
Does anyone have solutions? Have you been there yet?View attachment 68034

 

[ceschi1959]

ciao @marcoc , the problem lies in the cutting surface which must be perpendicular to the cone surface. only in this case you have constant thickness and not a slice of salami as it is yours. so if you make the cut before the thickening should do it.

 

[MARCOC]

hello to everyone... today afternoon I place the correct file. ..what I have put and has already been mistakenly modified ..practically the loft is not concentric, but the census below is decentralized compared to the above, and the problem on development presents only when I create the conical cut...which instead not from problems when the two circles are concentric

 

[MARCOC]

here is the file

if you already notice the suspicious function according to me is not correct on the bottom of the cone
if you cross the cone, the lower part is not perpendicular to the external face

 

[MARCOC]

this is done with inventorand how he could see the thickening and correct and develops it

with solid I can not get that result

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

but wouldn't it be better to work directly with the sheet functions since you want to achieve a straight development?

 

[MARCOC]

look at the difference in development

between solid and inventor

 

[MARCOC]

but wouldn't it be better to work directly with the sheet functions since you want to achieve a straight development?

hi massive...if you are how to get it correctly with solid...try to propose a solution

are all made with both solid and inv sheet commands

 

[Esselle]

I noticed that using the command "folding with loft" with the option "formed" development is not correct. for correcting it you have to use "piegato".

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

hi massive...if you are how to get it correctly with solid...try to propose a solution

are all made with both solid and inv sheet commands

if you use the "superficie-loft" commands, "inspect" and then convert to sheet metal you are not using the sheet functions.

I've already done that kind of cone in the past when I used pipes or plate development using the correct commands.
of proposals I have already given in the past, but you are of those who obtained the solution not from feedback and disappears in nothing until the next need, so why should I lose more time than necessary? I've written how it's done. You're good.

 

[MARCOC]

Did you look at the second file I posted?
and did you read well?

If the conical cut I do it after the sheet loft...the cut is not correct..for the same reason I wrote where I posted the second file...so the cad model is not correct...and I don't know if the development as a result is

 

[re_solidworks]

I use 2021 and can't open the file. Can you give me directions on cone geometry? so I can try to do it with 2021.

 

[MARCOC]

hi resolid te la giro made con la 2017 ok

 

[MARCOC]

here is the cone disassato solid2017

 

[re_solidworks]

here is the cone disassato solid2017

must be so disapproved? because if so is not a cone, but a different geometric figure that must be managed with sheet loft or with surfaces. for development and bend directions, if you want to do something realistic, you have to switch to a multi-fold geometry "spigolosa" and not continuous. Basically, you don't make it of calandra, but multiply or printed.

 

[re_solidworks]

Look at the attached file, it's exactly the geometry you shaped, but I used the surfaces to have clean profiles on which to perform the sheet loft. I removed the tick from "simplify folds" to have a more precise development.

 

[MARCOC]

hi king....I saw the file....it would also be good done using the loft sheet...but with the folds...the problem and that it does not accept the 3d sketches and therefore having to make then the conical cut after...I would not have the correct background...and then return to have the same doubt...the developments that kicks solid on those maths are correct?

try to remake the loft sheet by choosing flattened and unformatted...and you will see that it does not accept the 3d sketch below