• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

odds that change alone

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brunop
  • Start date Start date

Brunop

Guest
Hello, everyone.
I allow myself to ask for help to you that you will probably have this little problem car.
from a month use autocad lt 2024.
When I put a design, I happen to regenerate, save or simply turn off and turn on some layers and know that some share changes, in the sense that if it first indicated 0.8 cm, now indicates 0 or moves. Do you know if I have to set something up?
Can anyone help me?
thanks in advance,
Brown.

I used autocad lt for mac os and I had never had any similar problems.
 
I didn't notice anything strange.
is the original a very heavy file? Have you noticed this problem on other files or on other pcs?
 
No, we're always talking about 2 3 mb, but I've never had similar problems. I know it seems all right but every now and then when I go to check a bit the norte design that some share moves becomes 0 and this thing makes my job wrong and I can't afford it. with autocad os year 2015 I have never had such problems
 
I don't care either.
some questions/observations scattered:
- the value of the quota is 0.00 or the decimals are deleted so you read 0, but the quota remains 0.8?
- the drawing you have attached has several quotas, in order to do tests, studying the properties of quotas would be better if I indicated one that presents the problem
- you checked that the attached design contained the problem; I mean you have a design that presents the problem you mentioned, you have eliminated entities to streamline and purge the design while maintaining the problematic odds, but before you allege it you have verified that the problem persists?
- there are both associative, non associative, and partial quotas; Is that something you want?
- Do you have any particular settings/variables that you set for your benefit?
 
I did not find anything strange, regarding quotas, but I did the check command (correct errors, yes) and the file (saved in the original format v2013) became more than 10 times smaller.

Maybe there's something wrong....
 

Attachments

MassiVonWeizen said:
I don't care either.
some questions/observations scattered:
- the value of the quota is 0.00 or the decimals are deleted so you read 0, but the quota remains 0.8?
- the drawing you have attached has several quotas, in order to do tests, studying the properties of quotas would be better if I indicated one that presents the problem
- you checked that the attached design contained the problem; I mean you have a design that presents the problem you mentioned, you have eliminated entities to streamline and purge the design while maintaining the problematic odds, but before you allege it you have verified that the problem persists?
- there are both associative, non associative, and partial quotas; Is that something you want?
- Do you have any particular settings/variables that you set for your benefit?
Click to expand...
hi, it gives me the value 0 as if the quota had moved and the two points had put both in the same axis and therefore indicates 0 . I did not set any variable but I realized that the odds associated and not, I did not decide it . the only thing I set would be the rescue in a 2010 format instead of the last format. simply not to have boredom with customers that I must then postpone the file with the older format.
 
dsw said:
I did not find anything strange, regarding quotas, but I did the check command (correct errors, yes) and the file (saved in the original format v2013) became more than 10 times smaller.

Maybe there's something wrong....
Click to expand...
hi, it became smaller because before there were many things and I did not purge. I think that's why
 
per courtesy, manan queste risposte:
- the value of the quota is 0.00 or the decimals are deleted so you read 0, but the quota remains 0.8?
Click to expand...
or not?
-the drawing you have attached has several quotas, in order to make tests, studying the properties of the quotas would be better if I indicated one that presents the problem.
Click to expand...
indicate one!!
- you checked that the attached design contained the problem; I mean you have a design that presents the problem you mentioned, you have eliminated entities to streamline and purge the design while maintaining the problematic odds, but before you allege it you have verified that the problem persists?
Click to expand...
Have you checked?

besides that attachment you can attach the same portion, but with the quota "corrupt" to 0?
 
Brunop said:
hi, it became smaller because before there were many things and I did not purge. I think that's why
Click to expand...
no, cleaning and verification do very different operations. verification removed a data anomaly, cleaning removes the unused.
 
....is there any membership fees? I have always hated them, because if you don't know the mechanism, they can generate abnormal things.
I solve with: dimdissocia everything ... and then I go in the options, to verify that there is no check on: "rendi nuovo quota associative"
 
x11start said:
....is there any membership fees? I have always hated them, because if you don't know the mechanism, they can generate abnormal things.
I solve with: dimdissocia everything ... and then I go in the options, to verify that there is no check on: "rendi nuovo quota associative"
Click to expand...
I think that's the problem. but the problem is that I haven’t set anything. If I look in the options the check is not active on new membership quotas. One thing I did and will see if it is resolved, I put to 1 the function of massoc that would mean that if I move a quoted object, the share remains where it was and moves only the object. because turning on and off the layers according to me the associative quota interprets that I have moved and remitted the object, I do not know if I hear the idea .
 
lattu, associativa associates the quota to the object. I hate them because often you don't understand "what" you associate. Maybe you move or worse still cover an object, you get fucked. I always disassociate them, I prefer to have manual control.
 
Hi.
That is also my problem, indeed it was because as you suggested I do now nothing changes if I am not moving the quota. you know how to set it up
In principle the dissociation of quotas to objects ? thanks
 
when you are in the drawing, go on tools->options->user options remove the tick to "create membership quotas". then save the design (it is saved in the drawing).
if you want it permanent, open the basic model (acad.dwt, acadiso.dwt) follow the same procedure and save.
new designs will not have membership quotas.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top