alternating position subaxis

[cacciatorino]

I had a set that contained a subasieme. modifying a variable of the assieme father moved something in the father but also something else in the subaxieme, so everything ok.

hoping to simplify my life I created an alternating position set, in which two configurations are governed by the above variable. But the problem is that the link that made the subaxieme move no longer works, so the subaxieme no longer moves, and I can't even redefine the "commanded" variable of the subaxieme that is grey anymore, and also the "link copy" in the variable table of the assieme father became gray, so I can't even copy-patch his son.

Can I get out of here somehow?

 

[Be_on_edge]

I had a set that contained a subasieme. modifying a variable of the assieme father moved something in the father but also something else in the subaxieme, so everything ok.

hoping to simplify my life I created an alternating position set, in which two configurations are governed by the above variable. But the problem is that the link that made the subaxieme move no longer works, so the subaxieme no longer moves, and I can't even redefine the "commanded" variable of the subaxieme that is grey anymore, and also the "link copy" in the variable table of the assieme father became gray, so I can't even copy-patch his son.

Can I get out of here somehow?

I fear is a limitation of axioms with alternate positions; what version of solid edge do you use?

 

[cacciatorino]

I fear is a limitation of axioms with alternate positions; what version of solid edge do you use?

I'm using st10 now. Can I return to the situation of traditional assembly, even if I have a "save by name"? It's a fairly complex assembly and I'd take a long time to do it again.

 

[Be_on_edge]

I'm using st10 now. Can I return to the situation of traditional assembly, even if I have a "save by name"? It's a fairly complex assembly and I'd take a long time to do it again.

You must publish alternate positions as new assemblies.

Alternatively, you could bring what must "move" into the main axieme outside the alternate axieme.

 

[cacciatorino]

I'm using st10 now. Can I return to the situation of traditional assembly, even if I have a "save by name"? It's a fairly complex assembly and I'd take a long time to do it again.

My self-quote: Fortunately solid edge failed to save the file with variants, so I had to close it without saving it and I could recharge the situation before the tentative

 

[cacciatorino]

You must publish alternate positions as new assemblies.

Alternatively, you could bring what must "move" into the main axieme outside the alternate axieme.

thanks for the first suggestion. The second I can't do it because it would be too much in the assembly line.