1° test reale sul " die surface design "

[flaviobrio88]

I finally got the version with the module die surface design I immediately tested the module by loading a normal size element (so no for demos)

and that obviously had complex areas.

the result was impressive (they are part but it is true the module is impressive )


the procedures I used in order were:
balance
closure of all internal parts ( here I followed all my logic the flat areas I treated them separately)
Premilam
filling of imperfections for the creation of the outside figure
Figure (I have several sections available in this case I used only one type)

and finally a Agreement between the outfigure and the premier.

the time I took to do everything is about 6 or 7 minutes.

imho:

who does this kind of work knows very well that maybe 6 or 7 hours are not enough to get to the result I got in 6/7 minutes, another thing not to neglect (which I will test) is the fact that being completely associative parametric and therefore any modification will be made later (for example a precentinatura) the mathematics will update without having to do anything.

image attachment before and after


the video is here:
http://www.screencast.com/t/4drxkxpzu

 

[ziotoy]

Congratulations, really impressive.
Say hi.

 

[Matteo]

very interesting, congratulations!

ps: the video goes a bit to snaps, maybe it is better to put it on youtube

 

[flaviobrio88]

Congratulations, really impressive.
Say hi.

very interesting, congratulations!

ps: the video goes a bit to snaps, maybe it is better to put it on youtube

First of all thank you
now I'm trying a change but I want to go change the item right from the start
If I find the stl files, I'll try to change through springback.

p.
for yt I wanted to try some more brake parameters because cam is much more 'immediate to insert the screencast files (there is a direct link)

 

[flaviobrio88]

many times (practically always) after the out figure is done it is sent to simulation with to see how the sheet is behaved after the trim.
this process is called "springback", at this point you have to change the mathematical element to compensate for the elastic return and then remake all the out figure.

thanks to the die surface design and thanks to the new parametric associative motor the outfigure is recalculated automatically.

in the video (demo) the creation of the outfigure is moved with different sections and then the mathematical element is changed and you see the update directly.
http://www.screencast.com/t/82qezfkf

 

[Aliraza351]

the interface of omnicad, and also the "workflow", at least from what I see from the videos, resemble the old summit it...

 

[flaviobrio88]

the interface of omnicad, and also the "workflow", at least from what I see from the videos, resemble the old summit it...

interesting.

even if as you say the workflow is equal I have never seen a toptron in the market where I work "stamps sheet" I saw it in the plastic sector, where we are practically not present.
I deduce that the "workflow" is completely different.

 

[flaviobrio88]

the die surface design module has been updated.
the approach to the model has totally changed.
Plus in the video you can see how the parametric interacts quickly and easily, even after a change due to the elastic return.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huynvxmaowu