2d "precise" by 3d model of autocad

[Piron88]

Good morning, everyone. I am trying to export the 4 perspective views of my three-dimensional model of a building made with autocad. the model is composed of both simple three-dimensional elements, and blocks containing parameter of visibility (e.g. window block with inside windows of various size etc. ).
I tried, following some forums, to use the solprof command, but it does not represent the blocks. I thought then to explode them, the problem is that being blocks with various visibility inside, these, as soon as I explode them, are erased.
I then tried the wmfout command and then imported the file, but nothing to do, I was exported a mixture of overlapping lines.
I tried with the dxb printer, which would give me the best result until now, the problem is that in the 2d design generated by dxb, I have no precise measures (e.g., the windows with size 140, I find them with size 139.8567, so much to make an example ) I tried to use the scale command with reference, but nothing to do because the inaccuracies are not connected.
Can anyone give me a tip?

 

[AndreaVi]

Bye!
I'll throw it there hoping I'll get it right.
tried geompiatta?

 

[Cristallo]

Well, the streets you've beat them all. Each has its own qualities and its defects, as you have seen.
the fact is, allow me, that you worked badly, mixing solids (so 3d) with 2d blocks

the only way you have not yet explored is the dynamic sections (sectionplane).
with sectionplane you can "bar" generating a section plan outside your model3d.
After activated you will generate the section (it will insert a block with the section, which being made out of the model will become a prospect).
set (in the section settings) not to report hidden lines, and you should get a quick, discreetly manageable and accurate result.

another way to solve your dxb problem is to print with a huge scale, so that your window 140 results ... say 14000. probably a window of 13999.942xxxx, which returns to the original scale will become 139.99942xxxx more than enough to consider it as 140 pure.
It's an artifact, of course, but the important thing is the result, right?

I recommend you the path of dynamic sections.

 

[Piron88]

Well, the streets you've beat them all. Each has its own qualities and its defects, as you have seen.
the fact is, allow me, that you worked badly, mixing solids (so 3d) with 2d blocks

.

Wait a minute, in what sense do you want to tell me that the block reference would be an exclusive of the 2d? I want to understand it better sincerely also because I use the blocks not to weigh down the drawing files, which, when it comes to drawing buildings, become very heavy and little manageable without the use of the latter. enlighten me because until now I have always been convinced of the right with my way of working.
in any case I tried to use sectionplane, but nothing to do, the result is similar to solprof and geompiatta, in the sense that the blocks are not represented. I fear that the only solution is to create the prospectus with solprof and all the blocks (windows, railings) I manually add them in drawing 2d.

 

[GP.]

il command for this type of operations is flatshot (geompiatta), but it only works with solids and surfaces, although contained in the blocks.
you should then use this command, even if you subsequently enter your 2d blocks.

 

[Cristallo]

I tried, following some forums, to use the solprof command, but it does not represent the blocks.

I'm the mayor. Solprof only works on solids. for this you no longer see the blocks (which are not solids).

 

[gil]

If you have a 3d model because you want to pull out 2d brochures? if you have to print use the print layout.
otherwise the commands are those that have already reported to you: flatshot, geompiatta, sectionplane.

 

[Piron88]

Bye!
I'll throw it there hoping I'll get it right.
tried geompiatta?

il command for this type of operations is flatshot (geompiatta), but it only works with solids and surfaces, although contained in the blocks.
you should then use this command, even if you subsequently enter your 2d blocks.

then almost randomly I have to say that with the geompiatta command I solved all my problems!!!!:biggrin:
immediately when I tried it for the first time I had as a result the flat geometry of my building without the windows and the parapets (which are made up of blocks ). then, trying to fill this "gap" manually adding the flattened geometries of the blocks, I used geompiatta on the blocks, and for absurd it worked!
Finally I did so. I selected all my three-dimensional model, then copied it into a new design file. I aligned the view to the prospectus concerned, I gave "hidden" as visualization style. I typed the geompiatta command, checking the box shows on the darkened lines section. and the game is done! I got a prospect from the three-dimensional model including the definitions of the blocks, with the maximum precision of measure! Thank you very much for the straight boys, in one way or another served the resolution!:wink: