sincerely, I seem to have been given a little too unbalanced to be credible, especially as they come from a swx dealer, and also research was made on April 1st.... .I attach this intestine comparison between the cad + "gettonati" in the uses.
1 - sw
2 - pros
3.
the pdf is attached
while the site is the usual deelip.com
look I have been in the use last year to work and if I have to be sincere the search proposed by deelip.com mirrors reality...if you do not know sw and proes, in the use you are cut out from many business realities.sincerely, I seem to have been given a little too unbalanced to be credible, especially as they come from a swx dealer, and also research was made on April 1st.... .
Moreover it is not spcified if the listings are related to job offers or research. probably, since siemens plm is banging out of the market the dassault products, they are cad operators fired freshly looking for a new job..... :biggrin:
I fully share.sincerely, I seem to have been given a little too unbalanced to be credible, especially as they come from a swx dealer, and also research was made on April 1st.... .
Moreover it is not spcified if the listings are related to job offers or research. probably, since siemens plm is banging out of the market the dassault products, they are cad operators fired freshly looking for a new job..... :biggrin:
on the first part are not completely agreed, but on the second one: once you know a cad of high profile (proes) and you have some experience also with other products (swx, if, spaceclaim) learning another software is simple (just a full immersion week): I'm experimenting with ironcad.I fully share.
but swx dealers are good at telling lies is their strong.
One thing is certain
I've never seen big names of multinational industries using swx...
on the fact that one if you do not know swx or proe is cut out I would have something to recriminate.
who used a high-end 3d modeler in a quite push and is able to design, has no difficulty finding a job even with another cad, the step back is very easy, the opposite perhaps is more ostic, but the difference then always makes the handle. :smile:
It would be interesting to understand what is the situation in Italy, but I think we don't get far away. Just see the number of messages in the various forums, I know that it is a statisitca spoiled by various factors and not "scientific, but proe + swx cover more than 50% of the "space".I attach this intestine comparison between the cad + "gettonati" in the uses.
1 - sw
2 - pros
3.
the pdf is attached
while the site is the usual deelip.com
:finger:I fully share.
but swx dealers are good at telling lies is their strong.
One thing is certain
I've never seen big names of multinational industries using swx...
on the fact that one if you do not know swx or proe is cut out I would have something to recriminate.
who used a high-end 3d modeler in a quite push and is capable of designing, has no difficulty finding a job even with another cad, the step back is very easy, the opposite perhaps is more ostic, but the difference then always makes the handle. :smile:
hi matteo, a curiosity: why ironcad?I'm experimenting with ironcad.
various reasons, but especially for curiosity!hi matteo, a curiosity: why ironcad?
I agree:It would be interesting to understand what is the situation in Italy, but I think we don't get far away. Just see the number of messages in the various forums, I know that it is a statisitca spoiled by various factors and not "scientific, but proe + swx cover more than 50% of the "space".
how to spread in Italy, how are we put?various reasons, but especially for curiosity!
I have no idea, I think it's rare to find an ironcad installation. on the forum someone who uses it or used it there is (see "the Italian ghost" : http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=9614).how to spread in Italy, how are we put?