3d hidden

[Nic65]

procatug anticipated me:biggrin:
the show/hide is known but perhaps, for this context, it could be unpractical.
instead I care very much "preference - workplane - sim objects".
I'll try it right away.
Thanks endlessly again matrix:finger:

 

[beppino]

preference - workplane - sim objects

dim objects:tongue:

... I had never used it... bellino:smile:

 

[The_Matrix]

procatug anticipated me:biggrin:
the show/hide is known but perhaps, for this context, it could be unpractical.
instead I care very much "preference - workplane - sim objects".
I'll try it right away.
Thanks endlessly again matrix:finger:

maybe because I was used to pro/e that had specific commands to hide all axes/plates/csys with a click, I use it very often the show/hide

However, dear cat fans, in nx7.5.3 we put a feature browser that is practically equal to that v5... driven by those who are julying.. .

I believe you will also appreciate the new features groups that fuck the geometry sets. (I like it a lot)

 

[Nic65]

maybe because I was used to pro/e that had specific commands to hide all axes/plates/csys with a click, I use it very often the show/hide

However, dear cat fans, in nx7.5.3 we put a feature browser that is practically equal to that v5... driven by those who are julying.. .

I believe you will also appreciate the new features groups that fuck the geometry sets. (I like it a lot)

grandi! :finger:

 

[The_Matrix]

grandi! :finger:

in nx8 we will have:
- the extended selection of entities from the feature navigator
- the possibility of not "consuming" surfaces during topological operations (blend for example)
- optimize curves
- conic edge blend
... everything to go to cover the needs of the ammerikani detroit.. .

 

[procatug]

in nx8 we will have:
- the extended selection of entities from the feature navigator
- the possibility of not "consuming" surfaces during topological operations (blend for example)
- optimize curves
- conic edge blend
... everything to go to cover the needs of the ammerikani detroit.. .

no I would say to "copy" catia....what Americans?
is it that you are also moving on the ford front? (if I remember the last big3 to use cv5)

 

[The_Matrix]

no I would say to "copy" catia....what Americans?
is it that you are also moving on the ford front? (if I remember the last big3 to use cv5)

those who make the machines for you. . .

 

[procatug]

those who make the machines for you. . .

ah ok... those who say that catia v5 is better then nx and that without catia can not "project" productively....
those who do not want to exploit the potential of nx

 

[The_Matrix]

ah ok... those who say that catia v5 is better then nx and that without catia can not "project" productively....
those who do not want to exploit the potential of nx

... quelli che...
"why your b-pillar is so thick??"
"...and the visibility of 940 is worse than c-sedean..."
"... you really use 0.01 as class a tolerance?"
... è un mondo difficile procat... :finger:

 

[barlafus]

However, dear cat fans, in nx7.5.3 we put a feature browser that is practically equal to that v5... driven by those who are julying.. .

I believe you will also appreciate the new features groups that fuck the geometry sets. (I like it a lot)

How?? ?
ug copying catia?

grandi! :finger:

"big" why do you copy catia? ? ?


Hey guys, but then he was right about the cat salesman who told me that noug is back.
And I didn't believe him. .

 

[The_Matrix]

How?? ?
ug copying catia?



"big" why do you copy catia? ? ?


Hey guys, but then he was right about the cat salesman who told me that noug is back.
And I didn't believe him. .

Let's take those four good bitches that are there... :wink:
Other jokes... is the power of money: If you want to take a customer who has been using a method for 15 years and does not want to change it you have 2 possibilities:
1) not sold
2) put in your software what he asks
... we chose 2)

Then, to say it all is that they ask who knows what to robe... a browser for features... the modified feature groups... functions of surfaces leaving mothers (optional). . .
at the end is the user interface that changes a bit...
different would have been if they asked for changes thinking about the data model... That would have been a mess. But so...
little development effort... happy customer... $ incoming cascade... 2 customers ds in less on the market. . .

 

[Nic65]

Let's take those four good bitches that are there... :wink:
Other jokes... is the power of money: If you want to take a customer who has been using a method for 15 years and does not want to change it you have 2 possibilities:
1) not sold
2) put in your software what he asks
... we chose 2)

Then, to say it all is that they ask who knows what to robe... a browser for features... the modified feature groups... functions of surfaces leaving mothers (optional). . .
at the end is the user interface that changes a bit...
different would have been if they asked for changes thinking about the data model... That would have been a mess. But so...
little development effort... happy customer... $ incoming cascade... 2 customers ds in less on the market. . .

this allows a user who has to work on multiple systems, like the subscriber, to have to store less solutions for the same problem resulting in saving time and ... headaches.
It's not just something, so I repeat: great!:finger:

 

[barlafus]

Let's take those four good bitches that are there... :wink:
Other jokes... is the power of money: If you want to take a customer who has been using a method for 15 years and does not want to change it you have 2 possibilities:
1) not sold
2) put in your software what he asks
... we chose 2)

3) make you something new and better

you will always attack your competition (what will they have done to you?????) and then candidly affirm that "you copied".
who copy is second, in this world...

Then, to say it all is that they ask who knows what to robe... a browser for features... the modified feature groups... functions of surfaces leaving mothers (optional). . .

But how much did you use to copy them? ? ?
I use them from the r1!!!! (Not true, they bought me catiav5 from r3, or 5, I don't remember.. . )

at the end is the user interface that changes a bit...
different would have been if they asked for changes thinking about the data model... That would have been a mess. But so...
little development effort... happy customer... $ incoming cascade... 2 customers ds in less on the market. . .

2 more customers for 2 functions recently, copy?
but then with the revolution st all your competitors have no escape!
But the equation doesn't come back. .

this allows a user who has to work on multiple systems, like the subscriber, to have to store less solutions for the same problem resulting in saving time and ... headaches.
It's not just something, so I repeat: great!:finger:

read well, alas, tells us that they added little (It's not that they ask who knows what's wrong...); and it does not seem to be things that allow us not to change our method of work.

 

[The_Matrix]

3) make you something new and better

you will always attack your competition (what will they have done to you?????) and then candidly affirm that "you copied".
who copy is second, in this world...



But how much did you use to copy them? ? ?
I use them from the r1!!!! (Not true, they bought me catiav5 from r3, or 5, I don't remember.. . )



2 more customers for 2 functions recently, copy?
but then with the revolution st all your competitors have no escape!
But the equation doesn't come back. .




read well, alas, tells us that they added little (It's not that they ask who knows what's wrong...); and it does not seem to be things that allow us not to change our method of work.

barlafus.. .
the real world works a little different from our ideals... technical or convenience that are...
I don't attack anyone first. I say only (argumenting) that nx is the best (globally... ) for certain activities, automotive first.
you know catia well... I know nx well...
you have no idea the power of nx as a modeler. . as management of large assembly... as integration in teamcenter... in routing... in the capture of knowledge... in multicad management in tc... in synchronous... etc.

has limits... Of course. Like all things... or better, different ways to do things...
things that probably a nx "purist" like many in this forum aborr and will never use.
some examples:
Groups: It is a typically cautious way of organizing the part. nx traditionally uses other methods... layer, ref set etc... c wanted groups so as to work exactly as they were accustomed. . .
we put them: I personally like them... goes to see what they responded to the survey I had put here on cad3d the majority of users.
: nx traditionally "consumes" the surfaces that are involved in "topological" operations... don't you want it? Just make an extract first. it works like this and no one has ever dreamed of asking for a functioning to the caia (which seems to me "old")... to people's furor we put it in the 8... also here beppino/ip/ceschi etc will never use it... the Americans believe it is essential
browser : in nx the control structures are made with approach related to the assembly in top/down. has all the features to manage this type of approach.
c instead uses a different pattern: input file + processor + output file.
the "processor" contains hundreds of features and served a "furbo" way to go behind the ties between features.. .
no "normal" nx user uses this approach... They wanted it at all costs to facilitate the migration of their caty archetypes.
we took the assembly browser (which was equal to that catia for the parts) and we made it work on the parts.

All this makes, imho, nx better... I like these news... Many of my colleagues suck.
remains unchanged the traditional power of nx in the fields I told you before... we have added a series of functionalities aimed at facilitating things to users "ex catia".
we also did it for "ex ideas" users to make them migrate without excessive trauma to nx...
if it happens to migrate to nx companies (large) that use pro/e we will also do it for them... In fact, we're already doing this... siemens is one of the biggest ptc users, did you know? and slowly they are migrating to us.

"copying" good things is a good thing you know?
innovate so much to innovate (as it is doing ds with v6) instead it is to walk a dangerous road... and it seems to me that the market is not giving him reason.
plm technology change processes in companies are long-term processes.. .
... but...
look at the situation cad/plm of 2000 and look at the current one. . .
I'm not saying that cat is shooting... It's a great system. but it is undeniable and under the eyes of all that the monopoly of 10 years ago no longer exists.

with estimate (really...)

 

[ceschi1959]

barlafus.. .


: nx traditionally "consumes" the surfaces that are involved in "topological" operations... don't you want it? Just make an extract first. it works like this and no one has ever dreamed of asking for a functioning to the caia (which seems to me "old")... to people's furor we put it in the 8... also here beppino/ip/ceschi etc will never use it...

I'm a little traditionalist:wink:. before using the space mouse it took some time.... but I couldn't help it.
as well as for many 'new' commands or execution modes of the same. first I text them properly and then if they are valid I use them gladly.
the thing, in my opinion remarkable of nx is that in introducing new commands it leaves you the possibility often to use the old so you see the differences and peculiarities of each.

 

[beppino]

the thing, in my opinion remarkable of nx is that in introducing new commands it leaves you the possibility often to use the old so you see the differences and peculiarities of each.

quoto absolutely! :smile:
nx is a very "ductile" cad in my opinion, and this is good.
in some cases (see the new hole), you pay a small slowdown of the interface, but you can just model "as we want".:finger:

 

[The_Matrix]

quoto absolutely! :smile:
nx is a very "ductile" cad in my opinion, and this is good.
in some cases (see the new hole), you pay a small slowdown of the interface, but you can just model "as we want".:finger:

Drink. . .
Hold on! :biggrin:
... yesterday I tried 5 minutes the nx8: they made the new holes redefinable!! then switch from normal hole to threaded hole and vice versa!
... a myth falls!:finger:

 

[beppino]

Drink. . .
Hold on!
... yesterday I tried 5 minutes the nx8: they made the new holes redefinable!! then switch from normal hole to threaded hole and vice versa!
... a myth falls!:finger:

eek:
But really!! !
... ganzo:finger:

This is one of those things that were (imho) "born wrong".
better late than ever.:smile:

 

[The_Matrix]

eek:
But really!! !
... ganzo:finger:

This is one of those things that were (imho) "born wrong".
better late than ever.

I know.
:finger:
is missing only more than:
- the mirror leotard takes you behind the threads... .
- you can easily do broken view...
- other views from broken...
- the import/export dwg/dxf functions well...
and nx becomes a "normal" cad. :tongue:

However nx8 seems to me a version of those "rich", especially of so-called "accessories" functionality (papers... etc.).
As soon as I've tried a little bit and found out what they put in I tell you.

 

[IPdesign]

well, I also care a lot about the novelty in the field drafting, carts etc..

My customers are still far away from being able to do without 2d boards
and this is a waste of time that sometimes does not have returns.