3d software change.... on which to go?

[Stemox]

Hi.
I am thinking about the change given the little development of modeling ...that you say go on creo/direct? even if I have not understood what it is!
create parametric?
solidworks?

we design transport systems (trasp. tape, metal beams, elevators, screws and more) with modeling we find good enough for modeling, less for table putting (low and slender). I read that however this is a problem a little 'of all (I have no direct experience).

from September I would like to see the potential of these soft.

 

[cacciatorino]

Hi.
I am thinking about the change given the little development of modeling ...that you say go on creo/direct? even if I have not understood what it is!
create parametric?
solidworks?

If your asses are very large (tens of thousands of components) I suggest you stay on modeling.

 

[Stemox]

35/40% of the time we are at those levels.

 

[pirataviola]

If your asses are very large (tens of thousands of components) I suggest you stay on modeling.

take rhinoceros

 

[ale47p]

take rhinoceros

really rhino manages well assemblies from tens of thousands of components and is also practical for putting on the table?

 

[stevie]

really rhino manages well assemblies from tens of thousands of components and is also practical for putting on the table?

per niente...

 

[ale47p]

per niente...

Okay, otherwise I missed something.

 

[+forte]

really rhino......... is it also practical for the table?

se po fahttp://docs.mcneel.com/rhino/5/help/it-it/commands/make2d.htm

really rhino handles well assemblies from tens of thousands of components?

so far no one has ever counted them but I would not a priori for assembling mechanical parts,
I'm finally learning fathopper and his little friends and look at that kangaroo makeshttps://discourse.mcneel.com/t/new-version-kangaroo2/32863

 

[meccanicamg]

I would pass to cheese paper and charcoal.
barks aside, create direct and modeling manage or better charge large assemblies, but not having tree and parametric constraints seems lighter but die to make the tables.
solidworks that is parametric you have to use speedpack, light weights and various tools and arrange well the work but from satisfaction to the 2d.

 

[Kaji]

I've been making models for 15 years and I'm still alive.

 

[Polymar]

swx and modeling are two diametrically opposite cads. I use much more often the second, and from my point of view I think it is a unique tool in its kind.

 

[Kaji]

we design transport systems (trasp. tape, metal beams, elevators, screws and more) with modeling we find good enough for modeling, less for table putting (low and slender). I read that however this is a problem a little 'of all (I have no direct experience).

If you make lines then I recommend you stay on modeling and take the module "creo factory design" is "impressing", unfortunately I saw it less than an hour but it really stupid.

On the other hand, as far as the table is concerned, the biggest flaw of modeling is that by not managing the "works on groups" you have to create two different solid models to refer to two different tables, but in the case of lines I do not believe that there are many groups first welded and then sent to work on machine tools.
Besides compared to other software works worse the system of "automatic quotation", so much so that I don't think you use it anyone, but it has the advantage of generating 2d that are vectors, so if you have to make changes to the face using 2d software, especially me10, I think it is advantageous.

As for speeding up the harvests at the table, I can only recommend trying the free form dispatchment that allows you to continue working while updating a view.

I don't know how to switch from software to another has difficulty even in the conversion of the historian, for a few years solidworks has elysium that for how well it works with the 3d I think you leave orphans the 2d tables, so all the 2d that you could reuse thoroughly with the allga commands to copy and variant, are to be completely remade.