3d solid vi 2d

[andrea2987]

I have the three classic autocad 2d views, is there a program or command to automatically create the 3d model using the 3d views?
I ask this because it is a complicated piece to "create2 from scratch.
as programs I autocad and inventor 2011

Thank you.
Hi.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

the only one is elbow oil... as every garden dwarf should know.
you can't hope that from a two-dimensional software interprets the views and makes the features... Maybe like you. on a complicated design then with details, sections, false views. the design then is done well, there are all lines also the bevel 1x1 hidden behind the welding?
You will understand that if it exists it would cost a proposition

 

[mariuss.r]

I have the three classic autocad 2d views, is there a program or command to automatically create the 3d model using the 3d views?
I ask this because it is a complicated piece to "create2 from scratch.
as programs I autocad and inventor 2011

Thank you.
Hi.

It's a request you could put in your next Christmas letter. :wink:

 

[ceschi1959]

for simple things look here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbdkf21r5ke
ciao

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

but it is not simple. It's complicated. then to define what is simple for a cad there can be mathematical parameters therefore objective and complicated for a person instead you always remain on the subjective (especially without a rag of image that whoever uses inventor could examine).
Besides, correct me if I'm wrong of course, nx doesn't have versions for students; or did I not find it?

 

[ceschi1959]

but it is not simple. It's complicated. then to define what is simple for a cad there can be mathematical parameters therefore objective and complicated for a person instead you always remain on the subjective (especially without a rag of image that whoever uses inventor could examine).
Besides, correct me if I'm wrong of course, nx doesn't have versions for students; or did I not find it?

1) title of discussion: Is there a possibility to create a 3d model with 2d views? answer: yes with many limitations.
2) we talk about three classic views in 2d: it means that the piece is not so complicated (in the video there is a similar example)
3) exists the educational version and even a dedicated siemens forumhttp://community.plm.automation.siemens.com/t5/nx-student-forum/bd-p/nx-student-forum
ciao

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Okay. Good to know.
how complied we'll ever know. if it is not, as hypotheses, it could safely do it by itself that to download the student version, install it and learn the minimum necessary to make the conversion I think it puts us abundantly more than a day (time in which you can also make a structure a quite rognose)

this is always the time when students come with water to the throat, looking for miracles in software from psychic powers, giving almost null information because neither do they know where they have to stand and of course thinking that if they know how to use a tablet you want not to learn to make modeling in half day between a fif game and a whatsuppata with the ice cream lady in front of the house?

 

[numero1]

this is always the time when students come with water to the throat, looking for miracles in software from psychic powers, giving almost null information because neither do they know where they have to stand and of course thinking that if they know how to use a tablet you want not to learn to make modeling in half day between a fif game and a whatsuppata with the ice cream lady in front of the house?

Thanks, this one of the "whatsuppata" I still had to feel it............. :wink:

 

[D4nielsan]

on rhinoceros I do like this:
amount the three views, I clean them from quotas and texts or restraints, I create a group for each one and rough front and prospectus corresponding to the view and the move by sharing a point to all 3 so that they are synchronized.
from there it is a moment to build what you need as you have all the snaps to object ready.
I hope you have some help.

 

[Pasquale32]

But why don't you do the opposite? draws in 3d and then when you need the 2d make the geompiatta
- - - updated - - - -but why don't you do the opposite? draw in 3d and then when you need the 2d you make the geompiatta.

 

[numero1]

Because, as far as I understand, gorea already has 2d views, and he wants to be able to rebuild the 3d, that's all.
simply asks if it is possible.

 

[giotama]

in solid edge in the draft environment there is a command that helps you import 2d views within the 3d modeling environment by putting them as sketches on the orthogonal plans. manages to align them correctly and after making the 3d using excavations and protrusions guided by sketches it certainly becomes faster than rebuilding everything from scratch. In my opinion, however, it can be applied to the realization of not too complex parts

 

[john21wall]

is not easy but thanks for the information

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

in solid edge in the draft environment there is a command that helps you import 2d views within the 3d modeling environment by putting them as sketches on the orthogonal plans. manages to align them correctly and after making the 3d using excavations and protrusions guided by sketches it certainly becomes faster than rebuilding everything from scratch. In my opinion, however, it can be applied to the realization of not too complex parts
View attachment 43229

I am not convinced that it is a faster method, but admitting that there must be at the base the mental visualization of the particular that will have to be modeled, so you know that lines or areas select for the various functions, as well as clean and well-made sketches.
for this last point to check that the design does not have forced or rounded quotas, does not have stunned lines if not necessary, has closed areas (absolutely mandatory points), clean it from restraints, welding symbols, quotas and annotations several takes away time, sometimes so much time, that you can use to model from scratch I actually understand what you are doing.

I forgot that the method of importing sketches, if you want to save time, presupposes a knowledge of the modeler that cannot be that of the four basic commands of beginners.

I regret that after 7 months no one knows what the hell was supposed to be drawn and the user beat himself beaten well even to give a farewell.
and it tells me that I have to relax and not be aggressive (which still does not correspond to reality) but do not make things so easy.

 

[emanueleb]

Hello, everyone. I would like to know if possible one thing exists some program ke a photo makes it become gray and black shades to make a bas-relief with cnc thanks x ki replies

 

[folle76]

you have to use software for the world of engraving and artistic creation.
Like what makes sure what you ask: http://www.type3.com/

 

[emanueleb]

hi crowd 76 cmq thanks x the answer but nn I am useful this maybe nn know if to understand well that ke or need... Surely that ke I have to do that from a photo go to realize a bas-relief the problem and go well the z that is the depth

 

[folle76]

Bye. First of all, I don't know what software you have, so it's hard to give you a tip. Maybe I've been too coincident, but that software I've reported to you does what you want: you care in a plan a photo and the software, based on gray tones, attributes a depth/relief to each pixel. for example you can set that for dark tones give you a depth, while for the lighter ones a relief. there are to set the usual parameters: threshold levels between one tone of gray and the other, maximum excavation/relief etc... but allows you to create good things if the image is good without shaping anything. I saw it in action on zinc alloys combined with a cnc mill for the production of religious articles.

 

[emanueleb]

but does this software cost much or is it craccato? cmq software ke i am an easy stone... then ats3d x sculptures ... graphicad for engravings

 

[folle76]

It costs a lot. more than that craggy.