• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

3dexperience

  • Thread starter Thread starter bicciofabri
  • Start date Start date
I started using 3dx constantly for a few months to design injection molds. we talk about assemblies from about 300 parts + various occasions. use version could. sincerely it seems to me in general a good step forward (I confirm the slowness above all due to the cloud), or however seen the almost daily implementations seems to me that in a short time it will return to excellent levels. in reading some previous posts I saw that someone wrote that there are no materials. find them as c:\program files\dassault systemes\b425_cloud_content\win_b64\resources\materials, as well as find the materials to simulate filling (filling). attention the import is a little long. better to allocate a defined 3dspace area before leaving. talking about the mold industry some normalized exist (relatives to plates of the suppliers already present on v5 files\dassault systemes\b425_cloud_content\win_b64\resources). what has pierced me more initially is the "philosophy" of the specific tooling molding for my industry. completely different, but now that I understood some passages so much stuff. I work in a rather small reality, the development of the mold is almost a "part". everyone says his, continuous refinement changes, change of components, screws, thorns, change of accessories.... in this phase 3dx is decidedly more effective and much faster. Of course, you need to understand how to move it is as always are not in many to explain exactly what to do. from this point of view it is very latished, for infinite reasons including various interests.........
I don't think I'm going back, but I think I'm going to give up v5. only regret the very push customization I had made catalogs with knowladge module that here will remain a dream seen the disproportionate cost.
always with reference to previous posts it is not true that you can not cut in mode together. Let's say he's more snoopy but he does. I use this method commonly as well as the expected cut in the mtg module.
what worries me most is that I see that it does not start use. Unfortunately I understand why, especially in my sector. with 3dx many established habits of v5 are to be forgotten and not all are willing to make the change. usual "menata" of version changes, already lived in the past. but no sw manufacturer has ever returned to the old man.
 
(b) In my sector (automotive) , compared to v5/windchill (or v5/teamcenter ) and the assemblies in particular, I do not feel I can complain about .

above all, do not have to do (a lot) distinction plm/cad saves me a little time and rogne .


I do not use so many constraints, but on the dynamic sections/presentations/reports and similar things, I definitely prefer v6 . and, of course, the dynamic sections of v5 were not at the same level . unless they have only 3 components on the cross.



Perhaps tomorrow they will put the possibility to export something unsaved, but, in fact, export (and then deliver to others, customers or suppliers who are ) something that is not saved somewhere as "native" , does not seem to me an idea consistent with iso, certification systems , etc.?
I agree on everything.
 
to me it is pleased to read positive comments, of people who find in this version strength points, personally we travel together on order of the 50,000 components.
As for the mode of exporting an unsaved configuration, I often happen that during an advance I am required to send to suppliers, only partial customers or incomplete models because they do not have everything so as to me it is a menata to create models to ok then be saved.
belong this I think that there are really trivial things that the program itself does not manage and I hope that the use always increasing leads to improvements.
I tried to open some posts and I didn't get great answers, both for work together and for multi-level drawings.
blind explanations on everything, very useful cloud program agree but a plm that does not manage unique codes, offline mode, distinct base with user positions or codes with multi representations is decidedly rejected. there are much more advanced platforms.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top