Onda
Guest
?
maxopus
Guest
crew mi piace.
sampom
Guest
Exatem
Guest
like me too:finger:
then men of the filibusta we are already a good number (but I expect other arrangements).
Like I said, in January we're gonna have some fun, unpretentious. . .
However, we must define the guidelines. What do we want to do?
so much to have fun and do at the same time something "spectacular" look a bit about what the contemporary "design" is orienting. . .
"displaced trimarans" and bold solutions
maxopus
Guest
We must also establish with which or what software we intend to develop the project.
It is an important aspect because if we use more software management becomes more complex.
so we make the names of those who want to take care of the modeling and which software can utlize.
the table is less problematic, in the sense that you can build a dwg archive to which they can export all.
for what concerns me, I use pro/e and I can export the models of parts and assemblies in the format product view.
In this way all 3d files are available with the free ptc viewer and are lighter than 10 times compared to native formats.
It is an important aspect because if we use more software management becomes more complex.
so we make the names of those who want to take care of the modeling and which software can utlize.
the table is less problematic, in the sense that you can build a dwg archive to which they can export all.
for what concerns me, I use pro/e and I can export the models of parts and assemblies in the format product view.
In this way all 3d files are available with the free ptc viewer and are lighter than 10 times compared to native formats.
PaoloColombani
Guest
great exatem, I see that we share tastes and curiness! I have always been fascinated by the famine concept developed by the austral (the trimaran Tus indexence in your photo).
if you pay attention to the details you realize that it is also more than a simple displacement trimaran.
already that we are, perhaps it would be right to remember the style of Italian conception, or more precisely Venetian (but strictly marked uss).
already that we are, perhaps it would be right to remember the style of Italian conception, or more precisely Venetian (but strictly marked uss).
Exatem
Guest
Right.
In fact, I think a big problem will be to establish a "platform" of work. the dwg I think it's okay, it's a format read by everyone. I use microstation and the conversion of dwg always creates problems but for example if I limit myself to 2d, like the construction plan, I should not have great difficulties. then to view the works of the crew I have other resources... We need a project coordinator who checks the tasks.
we must see what we want to engage in, the purpose of the parent, what materials to adopt, what engine apparatus, and a thousand other things... I repeat, it would be interesting to try to explore "extreme environments"; hulls from the lines still "azzardate", mixed motorizations, sources of ecological and renewable energy, respect for the environment, and so on...
so much it costs nothing except time (but we have no deadlines), so we can exaggerate!
appearance some proposal, type: yacht with flight deck, helicopter, swimming pool, wine cellar at controlled temperature, reduced crew (power automation) but oceanic capacity, etc. etc.
Come on with the proposals.. .
Er Presidente
Guest
Exatem
Guest
In fact, as I said in the previous post, since it costs nothing, we exaggerate. . .
Exatem
Guest
Do not provoke me...:36_1_28:
sampom
Guest
I would have liked to try to do something with the program I use habitually (so solidworks), just to test it and test me in different areas from my usual. for export in 2d dwg there would be no problems and the results in 3d can be saved in the common interchange formats (step?) so that they can be displayed and inserted in the project by all. then images and everything.
apart from that the 2d would serve us for the possible table of the constructors.. but do we want to get there? I think we'd miss the construction site. and money :biggrin:
greetings
Mar
apart from that the 2d would serve us for the possible table of the constructors.. but do we want to get there? I think we'd miss the construction site. and money :biggrin:
greetings
Mar
Exatem
Guest
the design phase as you see in the posted renderings, can be the result of an idea. but if we want to "design" a boat/ship, we must in any case, draw a building plan. will provide us with the geometry of the hull necessary to then have fun creating all the layouts of the interior, the plants, the structure of the hull. It is the "pape" of the design of a parent and cannot be prevented from it. otherwise you limit yourself to drawing what you see above the surface that is not by chance, it is called "dead work".
sampom
Guest
right from there I left:smile:
are the years past with the "sicilian" that stimulated my dreams (I was also much younger.):biggrin:
greetings
Mar
Exatem
Guest
continue and I'll put you on. .
sampom
Guest
Clearly.
and this part from "sections" 2d that will be charged with " pure naval work" that you have knowledge and resources. discussed and decided (and explained to us profane) this part, the most important as you rightly point out, you can start with the modeling of the hull. Once I put the sketches down, it seems to me that many cads (to know how to use them) can pull out coherent surfaces. and I saw that swx someone uses it to do this.
then I don't know, they're guessing that comes from my inexperience in the field (bacino?:smile
, it'll always turn to you (i navali from now on in the text) draw up a detailed design program to follow step by step.In short, there is no problem, tell me what I have to do and I do it.
greetings
Mar
sampom
Guest
Exatem
Guest
Clearly.
and this part from "sections" 2d that will be charged with " pure naval work" that you have knowledge and resources. discussed and decided (and explained to us profane) this part, the most important as you rightly point out, you can start with the modeling of the hull. Once I put the sketches down, it seems to me that many cads (to know how to use them) can pull out coherent surfaces. and I saw that swx someone uses it to do this.
then I don't know, they're guessing that comes from my inexperience in the field (bacino?:smile
In short, there is no problem, tell me what I have to do and I do it.
greetings
Mar
I tell you twice in one shot... and then complained. . .
1) Solidworks I don't think it has any problems managing surfaces.
2) I am not susceptible. I'm a hook captain!
sampom
Guest
Come on.
And I'm a sponge. .
greetings
Marco (also peter pan, more consonant to my indol, but I would not give you against:smile
marcof
Guest
Who does crocodile? :tongue:
sampom
Guest
but it was not: <. and crocodile as it does..>? :biggrin:
However, he could do so, Mr President, not so much for the tears as well as for the grinding of teeth and the mighty and volitive jaw. .
greetings
Marco:smile: