• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

aerospace or mechanical engineering?

  • Thread starter Thread starter luigi.paiano
  • Start date Start date
....I want you to do what you want you can only give it to you and only experience....and to have it you have to break a lot...
 
(cut)... clearly the second option entitles me, but it would mean "to break" another sermon.

I'll think about it.

p.s.: How do I make sure that my interventions are kept in the right consideration even if apparently "criptics"?
:smile:
Your sermons are always stimulating so don't think too much about it. For the second part, you could subtitle them on page 777.

However what you say has a foundation of truth. I was going to recommend them the way of the sighting. If you're wrong, you can always do the honour.
if he likes it "... deepen certain aspects such as fluid dynamics, aerodynamics and imposing buildings" and also "...study on your own, I learned from myself the cad programs, I learned from myself to use ansys, and other stuff.. what I want is to have a broad knowledge, in order to have the word in every sector. " Perhaps a specialist is not enough. what I mean is that it is difficult to be "genericly competent". It should be limited to choosing a subject and deepening as much as possible the aspects that concern it.
But I understand it's difficult.
 
Your sermons are always stimulating so don't think too much about it. For the second part, you could subtitle them on page 777.

However what you say has a foundation of truth. I was going to recommend them the way of the sighting. If you're wrong, you can always do the honour.
if he likes it "... deepen certain aspects such as fluid dynamics, aerodynamics and imposing buildings" and also "...study on your own, I learned from myself the cad programs, I learned from myself to use ansys, and other stuff.. what I want is to have a broad knowledge, in order to have the word in every sector. " Perhaps a specialist is not enough. what I mean is that it is difficult to be "genericly competent". It should be limited to choosing a subject and deepening as much as possible the aspects that concern it.
But I understand it's difficult.
But I want to try....I want to be a free professional from great,I don't want to get tired...according to you it's risky to do aerospace with the intention of not wanting to get into all the costs in the aviation industry?
 
But I want to try... .I want to be a free professional from great,I don't want to get tired... according to you it's worth aerospace with the intention of not wanting to get into all the costs in the aviation industry?
but is this the point, a free professional in which sector? It's this choice that will condition the rest of your life.
 
I would like to do as much as possible, but if I have to choose, I would like to deepen the subjects of aerospace, but I'm afraid to close myself in the aviation industry that paradoxically does not inspire me. I'm afraid of that sector, there's little and it's saturated. I don't want to design planes all my life. I want to feel free to apply my knowledge elsewhere
 
no, awareness of the Italian situation. I just want to see if with aerospace I'm destined exclusively for planes all here.
 
but I don't know what to recommend, perhaps for the level of companies that are in mechanical Italy can offer more possibilities, indeed surely.
for the speech that an aerospace can hold assignments as a mechanic is true in part. preferentially in recruitment, courses of study are preferred as much as possible in the field.
 
no, awareness of the Italian situation. I just want to see if with aerospace I'm destined exclusively for planes all here.
purtrope can be that with aerospace you can not still design planes.. .
to be a consultant and a freelancer is not enough school preparation and not even the one resulting from personal interest but needs experience. and experience must be specific to the sector in which you want to operate. or you can try the path of "inventor" (I know different unfortunately) that try to propose to companies new "technologies" and patents that in 90% of cases are inseparable, but in 10% can bring earnings (thanks to a strong investment and a commercial network. ..
to conclude: until 30 years ago it was enough to be an engineer to apply in any field, now it is much more sectoral and specific both preparation and demand.
 
Your sermons are always stimulating so don't think too much about it. For the second part, you could subtitle them on page 777.

However what you say has a foundation of truth. I was going to recommend them the way of the sighting. If you're wrong, you can always do the honour.
if he likes it "... deepen certain aspects such as fluid dynamics, aerodynamics and imposing buildings" and also "...study on your own, I learned from myself the cad programs, I learned from myself to use ansys, and other stuff.. what I want is to have a broad knowledge, in order to have the word in every sector. " Perhaps a specialist is not enough. what I mean is that it is difficult to be "genericly competent". It should be limited to choosing a subject and deepening as much as possible the aspects that concern it.
But I understand it's difficult.
not to count that a specific preparation in a well-defined field denotes clear ideas, often well evaluated by companies.
when I was at university I often heard from the "elders": "Let the standard study plans stand out, make a personalized one, take an exam from here, one from there, so you have a broader culture and in the world of work you'll be going out!"
nothing more wrong. and I "elder" in the university did not become :cool:
I chose a very specific field, I chose all the exams of that sector, I did the thesis in the company, I was hired in that company (well... not immediately) and currently do exactly the work I like and for which I studied.
It's a rare situation, and I hope it lasts, but I'm the living demonstration that "having a vast culture" means not having deepened anything, in the last fringe of your life where it is still possible to deepen.
 
purtrope can be that with aerospace you can not still design planes.. .
to be a consultant and a freelancer is not enough school preparation and not even the one resulting from personal interest but needs experience. and experience must be specific to the sector in which you want to operate. or you can try the path of "inventor" (I know different unfortunately) that try to propose to companies new "technologies" and patents that in 90% of cases are inseparable, but in 10% can bring earnings (thanks to a strong investment and a commercial network. ..
to conclude: until 30 years ago it was enough to be an engineer to apply in any field, now it is much more sectoral and specific both preparation and demand.
quoto michele81.
I renew my advice, study what you like, without thinking too much about work outlets. It's the best solution in every respect.
you graduate first and better, studies with more passion and then you remain the concepts. So much then when you get into the world of work, if you're okay, you do what you like, if you're wrong, you get compromised, but this is quite independent from the course of studies.
I think the moment when we have to start thinking about the world of work is thesis. if you can do it in the company is a great thing, especially if the company is interested in the work of thesis, and not only to a little work aggratis.

less than rare cases, engineer is engineer, non-mechanical or aerospace.
 
the world of work today for graduates is difficult both for you to be aerospace, mechanical, and lawyer. at this point you should choose the path you like, which deepens the aspects that interest you most. a good engineer must be able to be flexible, if tomorrow the world of work will ask you to specialize in another sector you will still have the basis to do so.
Good luck!
 
I'll tell you how I see it. at university, precisely because it gives you the basis for the future, it is better to make a broad study plan (obviously with a logical sense) so that it gives the basics on how to reason in various applications. also because university studies alone, even if aimed at only one field of interest, will never be enough to compete with an experienced engineer in that field there. I see university as a starting point. After having a good base in many sectors you look for work (and hopefully find it) aware that you have to continue studying and gaining experience in that field there.
 
I didn't do the unit, but I've had africagia.
then the real specialization will come with practical work.
Hi.
 
If I wanted to be fun, I wrote a joke.

Anyway, I'm "removing" an answer and I'm at a crossroads. I could answer you on the personal level, with a "contingent" assessment on what, for me, would be better.
or I could (I would, I would like) answer you by addressing the problem "philosophical" coming out, therefore, from the specific context.

clearly the second option entitles me, but it would mean "to break" another sermon.

I'll think about it.

p.s.: How do I make sure that my interventions are kept in the right consideration even if apparently "criptics"?
:smile:
I'll be brief.

first: think about the future professional outlet to decide what to study is losing at the start.
in my time if you didn't study as a "programmer" you had no future, now the programmers are all hungry.
a profession is not going to screw bolts, so it serves soul heart and madness.
Even if there's an inflation of doctors, if you're passionate and talented, you'll be a world-class surgeon, but you must be a madman of passion.

second: according to the first consideration, you have to decide not what to study, but what you want to be. a caxxone or a professional. If you think that studying needs to find a salary, you can study what you want, I have the impression that the accountants are all pretty caxxons like the lawyers, so you can choose. If you have the passion that burns in you and you're a fool who dreams of impossible things, you're convinced that 99% of those you talk to are a little underdeveloped, then choose what the heart commands you, aeronautical engineering, but if that were so you wouldn't even have the doubt.

p.s.: OK I'm crazy, but now I'm "stant" and I can afford it.
:smile:

p.p.s.: put some heart in things! by caxxo!!! ! !
:smile:
 
quoto! the "buzzo", it takes of the "buzzo", otherwise will flourish the suppliers of lauree via web in 5 working days. . .
I understand!ok enough, fuck it all (you hear Frenchism)...I like fluidodynamics and aerodynamics and I will study those!thank you all!
 
I understand!ok enough, fuck it all (you hear Frenchism)...I like fluidodynamics and aerodynamics and I will study those!thank you all!
Good boy! always follow your skills and remember, today as today does not count to participate, but to win.
competition is so much and you have to be number one, you will see that the rest will come as a result.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top