Mattymecc
Guest
Hi, at a first glance it seems fair to me, tonight I do well the calculations and let you know
Primoalessio
Guest
thanks both for the graphics you sent me and for all the rest
Mattymecc
Guest
Hi, I started to deal with it, but I didn't finish, tomorrow I'll give you the results. In the meantime, I would like to take a question, in the annexed document concerning the analytical calculation of the longitudinal distribution of the load, do two co-effents appear that I do not know where they come from, able to give me a hand? Thank you.
meccanicamg
Guest
I am looking at the pdf attached by primoalessio. the first part can be carried out with any method.
the second part I looked at it quickly and compared the results with iso 6336. If you didn't make the deal wrong, we are.
the second part I looked at it quickly and compared the results with iso 6336. If you didn't make the deal wrong, we are.
meccanicamg
Guest
If you take over the rule or a slightly more complete treatment, you can have more clarity.
on iso 6336-1 is explained everything.
meccanicamg
Guest
discussion with formulas qui
Mattymecc
Guest
hi, this is my calculation of the various factors, obviously with the approximations due to the calculation by the tables... .
some of your calculations I took them for good, as well as the qs coefficient you found.
some of your calculations I took them for good, as well as the qs coefficient you found.
Attachments
Mattymecc
Guest
As regards coefficients a and b I do not know which correspondents are in iso 6336 1, however I remember that discussion having made it myself. However I think I do not deepen, I have already begun to implement iso 6336 on excel.. .
Primoalessio
Guest
Thank you. I'll look inside.