all about file system or all about model manager

[reb_bl]

I have long used that of eit, and I think it has merits and defects. The most serious defects in my opinion are that it does not handle light loads and excessive "verbity", in the sense that it asks you too much confirmation to every operation.

What do you mean "people on the piece"?

for people on the piece I mean people who used it/use it to work every day, not theoretical, smoking and smoky stuff like cdm (who bought eit) and kept all the technicians and integrated their bookstores.

 

[cacciatorino]

for people on the piece I mean people who used it/use it to work every day, not theoretical, smoking and smoky stuff like cdm (who bought eit) and kept all the technicians and integrated their bookstores.

the main problem of pdm eit is that only they can put their hands on us for configurations/maintenances, so you are tied hands and feet to a specific company. By the way, when I had to deal with it I was very reluctant to provide advice on use and configuration, even to paying cients, and you understood the intention to force you to call their technician at their hourly rates even for simple tasks. given my experiences with them, both at technical and commercial level, I think the purpose they have done was the logical consequence of their behavior towards customers.

If you choose modelmanager you're on a standard product and you'll find a competent technician more easily.

bookstores are a separate speech exulating from the pdm, I didn't buy them to save something.

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

p.s.: that then learn to distinguish a "version" from a "revision" would do well to all, regardless of pdm.
:smile:

You finally said something wise! It was time!!!

 

[Er Presidente]

You finally said something wise! It was time!!!

"was now" in the sense that it was time I said something wise?

 

[reb_bl]

the main problem of pdm eit is that only they can put their hands on us for configurations/maintenances, so you are tied hands and feet to a specific company. By the way, when I had to deal with it I was very reluctant to provide advice on use and configuration, even to paying cients, and you understood the intention to force you to call their technician at their hourly rates even for simple tasks. given my experiences with them, both at technical and commercial level, I think the purpose they have done was the logical consequence of their behavior towards customers.

I bring back what I have seen in the last demo, according to my needs it is now more customizable (by the user) that of the eit, despite it is much improved also pe3, that I currently use and hate, as it is right to bring an example has (in some place) a script or a lisp that I go to copy from servers the custom folders, alias I can not have hypothetically a text of mine (for example my model) saved as

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

"was now" in the sense that it was time I said something wise?

Yes!!!:

 

[and]

advice. .
start using standard modelmanager then see slowly what you really need to integrate as info ....

 

[Steeve]

we have made a decision... everything that will be produced with modeling will be managed with pdmlink that will then be the pdm also of the current objects of pro/e . thanks to all for the advice:4425::4425:

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

we have made a decision... everything that will be produced with modeling will be managed with pdmlink that will then be the pdm also of the current objects of pro/e . thanks to all for the advice:4425::4425:

Good choice!