alternative method for geometric tolerances

[Davide Donà]

Good evening, everyone!

at the time when I worked on pro/e I had devised an alternative method to insert geometric tolerances on drawings.
I found the system very complicated in this functionality, at least in the medium-low design level such as what I did.
practically is a trick based on the use of symbols and notes.
Give us an eye and tell me what you think.
http://www.manuali.net/manuali/intr...lternativo_per_le_tolleranze_geometriche.html

 

[Davide Donà]

I'll have to hire a secretary to handle the answers...:biggrin:

 

[niki]

I use proe wf from 2 onwards... Sincerely, I don't think I'm so cumbersome about the inclusion of geom tolerances. on the table, just use the custom button and go fishing in the folder where you hold tolerances, roughness notes or things like that, in short, hello.
Niki

 

[Davide Donà]

Hi.
I have not seen the program since 2001.
Then I invented this system because to insert the tollg it was necessary to create a reference plan on purpose.
evidently ptc realized that he was a bit cumbersome and changed system...I apologize but I didn't know. Maybe if there's still someone using 2001 can come in handy.
thanks for the answer

 

[maxopus]

Hi.
I have not seen the program since 2001.
Then I invented this system because to insert the tollg it was necessary to create a reference plan on purpose.
evidently ptc realized that he was a bit cumbersome and changed system...I apologize but I didn't know. Maybe if there's still someone using 2001 can come in handy.
thanks for the answer

your contribution is still appreciated, so thank you regardless.
Since 2001, it has changed a lot in the pro/e user interface.
I started using it in 2006 from wf3, I think if they gave me 2001 in my hands I don't know where to start.
for old users 2001 is considered the most stable and performing version of pro/e.

 

[Davide Donà]

2001 was a cool show! Turned great on ridiculous computers, type repentum ii 400 mhz, 128 mb ram, 16 mb video card. clear that when you went on a high level design it was necessary something extra, but basic enough what I said. in my opinion ptc has "snaturated" some software for commercial reasons, approaching the typical windows programs. for us "old" the drop-down menus were an unparalleled totem, a signature, which made pro/e unique and unreachable in its kind.

 

[niki]

who has known proes from the wf on then tremble to the only thought of the old interface.... has changed so much! I myself when I find myself using commands that remained 'old style' at the moment I struggle to orientate myself.
cmq the speech of tolerances, so you say that you had to choose orientation. . . looks similar to inserting annotations in model 3d, in fact it is not immediate to understand.

 

[Prof.]

I love the latest versions of pro-e and I love the drop-down menus. I find it ridiculous that in 2010 they are still present on important commands such as sheet metal, sections, fields, reference curves etc. etc.
Bye.

 

[Davide Donà]

"aborr," "ridiculous"... what parolons! tendon menus were great, as well as icons. using these words means a little offending the "old" like me who made the bouquet on the menus and only try a little nostalgia. Anyway I looked at the new versions, and I think the menus are still there, well hidden under some settling. in practice the "motor" remained that, they only changed the appearance to make happy the generation of "schiacciabottoni".

 

[Prof.]

yes the engine remained the same is only the interface that hand hand was updated. Moreover since the functions already there are what it wants to renew the interface.
Obviously with "aborr" and "ridiculous" I did not want to offend anyone, I speak from "reseller" that today must sell the software to those who maybe never used it or never used a 3d. therefore you will realize that the drop-down menus are less friendly and intuitive than the icons and dashboards of the commands.
Bye.

 

[Davide Donà]

Okay, I agree with you. indeed for those who are a little narrow of computer views the drop-down menus frighten, although I have to say that from the didactic point of view they are great because they make you think about the step-by-step features.
It is clear that once we learned the concept, we too old went away from macro to great. Bye.