alternative positioning

[masspa]

Good morning, a strange request. .
is it possible in a set to set a part with multiple positioning constraints?
example, if a plan that regulates the z is not available or uses another one that is present instead.


in my case I have a table with 4 legs and a shelf that has the height connected to the left legs,
but sometimes I have to remove the left legs and other times the right legs, so I never have a fixed reference.
I wanted to set an additional reference to the legs of dx.

I hope it's understandable,
Thank you very much.

 

[320i S]

you can do "n" constraints, and then turn them off and reactivate them, but they must be consistent with each other, otherwise the program goes wrong.
but if you need to manage multiple axiemi configurations (via family table or not), I recommend something much more efficient, i.e. the skeleton (which for simple things, you don't need to do them with its liscence).

 

[masspa]

The skeletons have disabled them, I will try to make other constraints.
Thank you.

 

[Serviman]

when you restrict a component, if you check well, you can create different sets of constraints, sets that you can name and activate/disable. clearly when you create a new set of constraints you must turn it off.
once you have more than one set of constraints you have to:

1. generate a family table of the axieme
2. create a variant column
3. wax the variant between the parameters
4. open the parameters window, you must first select the compost curtain
5. then once you touch the compost you will see that you will be shown the parameter ptc_constraint_set:fid_34 (the number is variable)
6. obviously select the parameter and bring it to the family table.
7. at this point in the family column put the name of the sets placement variants.

That's how it works.
I hope I've been clear.

Hi.

 

[masspa]

Thanks for the answer.


I'm starting right now.

2.create a variant column
a family table open click on add/elimina columns table and I put the ball up Parameterat the new table I can't create a parameter but only select an existing one, do I have to create it first?

Are you talking about something else?

 

[Serviman]

That's the point, it's very "hidden." . .
when you open the parameters you have to be careful and select from the "component" curtain.
then, select the component that has the placement variants and magically appears the desired parameter "ptc_constraint_set:fid_#". select it and put it in the family.
at this point in the dedicated column call back the name you gave to the placements.

 

[masspa]

I did! ! !
Thanks again

 

[Serviman]

I did! ! !
Thanks again

Figures

 

[Lawrence]

Hello, both of you!
I followed the procedure to the letter, succeeding in inserting the double set of placement inside the family tableWhen I run the verification, I don't report any errors, but when I generate the children of the family table, it directly eliminates the components related to those parameters.
Can you help me?

 

[Serviman]

In my opinion you have to investigate better, probably in the family there is something that makes the placement vain, or you have to stretch a bit better in the description of the problem. As you explained, it's a little complicated to help you.

Good job

 

[Lawrence]

In my opinion you have to investigate better, probably in the family there is something that makes the placement vain, or you have to stretch a bit better in the description of the problem. As you explained, it's a little complicated to help you.

Good job

I'm sorry, you're right. I admit that it is only a little more than a month I bazzico on creo, and it is not even easy for me to use the correct terms to make me understand. . .
I try to explain myself better.
I have a flared head screw that, depending on the configuration, must mount or in one seat or another:I have therefore created the double mounting set using the "centered" option so as to directly contact the 2 conical surfacesThen I put the 2 sets in the family table (as you can see in the image in the other message), but eventually the screws disappear, both in one configuration and in the other.Did I miss writing the text in the family table?
I can also say that the screws in question are further serialized, not following an existing pattern, but giving it direction from a plan.

I hope I've been clearer

 

[Serviman]

Why don't you try to place them with some traditional constraints instead of the "centered"?

 

[Lawrence]

Why don't you try to place them with some traditional constraints instead of the "centered"?

Good morning!
I tried this too, but nothing... there will be some other problem elsewhere.
Now I have to do more: I will keep the problem in the cannon and as soon as I have time I will make other experiments.
Thank you for your assistance!