• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

anti-piracy agreement

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Matrix
  • Start date Start date
It's not that in this way you're going to keep them more than once, the supplier might have a license in order and n pirates and with the time of justice in Italy there wouldn't be a way to get a possible damage from block production cause 0x248....
I'll give you the example of fiat.
qualify the supplier... See what structure it has... how many nx and tc licenses it has... the network towards you... the skill of people. . .
After you've passed the valuations you can apply to become a supplier.
I don't understand what's difficult in evaluating the number of design hours I give you... the delivery time... the number of official licenses you have and the number of designers. . .
If I go back with it counts, and you turn to this supplier anyway, you are in malafede.. .
or you make him put the penny of the license he uses.

it takes a few hours to do these qualifications and not accept dogs and pigs.

If then the bologna use suppliers that give him parasolids and that's okay, well, we can't get anywhere. . .
 
I'll give you the example of fiat.
qualify the supplier... See what structure it has... how many nx and tc licenses it has... the network towards you... the skill of people. . .
After you've passed the valuations you can apply to become a supplier.
It's a speech made and remade a lot of times, never convinced me to ask for certifications, so much so they're so far away... maybe fiat can control suppliers, but for small companies there's no way...
 
It's a speech made and remade a lot of times, never convinced me to ask for certifications, so much so they're so far away... maybe fiat can control suppliers, but for small companies there's no way...
I don't understand the difficulty. . .
How many suppliers do you have?
 
I don't understand the difficulty. . .
How many suppliers do you have?
quoto... we are not like fiat, but we try in our little to safeguard what we have and do and as collaboration with external firms, engineering studies etc. is on the agenda, these cannot fall from the clouds and pretend nothing if you require guarantees. If they don't have anything to hide the data, they just give it to you, like they did with me.
 
be.cad
What do I have to do... ask game iva sell the house bring me behind the pcs
You understand the market. I see big design firms that don't design anymore, they're just business owners. Afterwards the project make it do so in Albanian and Romanesque where it costs less, to specialized studies for projects in European community.
the project is shipped italia, and here printed, signed and stamped. Nothing else.


By the way, piracy is illegal, I would like to see it.
but that trusts are illegal, only that antitrust associations do not count a patch, and therefore the prices are oversized by the lack of competition.
 
be.cad

You understand the market. I see big design firms that don't design anymore, they're just business owners. Afterwards the project make it do so in Albanian and Romanesque where it costs less, to specialized studies for projects in European community.
the project is shipped italia, and here printed, signed and stamped. Nothing else.


By the way, piracy is illegal, I would like to see it.
but that trusts are illegal, only that antitrust associations do not count a patch, and therefore the prices are oversized by the lack of competition.
Unfortunately globalization, technology and ease of communication led us to this.
I saw how they worked, for example, a group of Romanians detailing the duchy... Well, chapeau. .
ligi to the rules of design and business. . .
tireless workers. . .
no free controversy.. .
...... Maybe they were white flies... But if we think we're going to war on prices with these, I think we have little hope.
 
but I would like to bring back the question in topic by inviting mbt to avoid, at least in this tread to refer to the story of 1390€, unconscious true, but there is a special tread where we have already expressed .
There is nothing to do with this: No need to be aggressive.
I didn't tell you anything. .
It's just that I've posted a news about an agreement between nations and immediately the usual laughing at siemens. .
is not a matter of siemes, microsoft, mozilla or nokia
is a question of well more general and deep concepts
and in summary it is expressed thus: "to the great everything is allowed", "no one controls the usual suspects" and " always the average citizen"
Unfortunately it is reality.
In fact the big multinationals are certainly in order with the licenses, but they have a structure to exploit them 24 hours a day. It is not their fault, indeed. and it's not even illegal. as it is not illegal that licences are sold at prices "please" for a thousand reasons. However, these "please prices" are compensated by the user's "normal" prices that buy one or two of them.
I'm not even writing about the usual suspects. We all know what happens in the Far East, and they're not bagigi. However, these countries have not signed anything. and no one controls them.
the last concept is the synthesis of all others. who does software and is fighting against piracy of the east, against prices given to certain companies etc. etc. You have to do it again. that generally is, they apputno, the small entrepreneur or the small company that has a small business volume, which buys a couple of licenses at full price, which has to pay for maintenance etc etc etc etc etc etc.
all, it is good to say, it is perfectly normal and legal.
 
is not a matter of siemes, microsoft, mozilla or nokia
is a question of well more general and deep concepts
and in summary it is expressed thus: "to the great everything is allowed", "no one controls the usual suspects" and " always the average citizen"
Unfortunately it is reality.
In fact the big multinationals are certainly in order with the licenses, but they have a structure to exploit them 24 hours a day. It is not their fault, indeed. and it's not even illegal. as it is not illegal that licences are sold at prices "please" for a thousand reasons. However, these "please prices" are compensated by the user's "normal" prices that buy one or two of them.
I'm not even writing about the usual suspects. We all know what happens in the Far East, and they're not bagigi. However, these countries have not signed anything. and no one controls them.
the last concept is the synthesis of all others. who does software and is fighting against piracy of the east, against prices given to certain companies etc. etc. You have to do it again. that generally is, they apputno, the small entrepreneur or the small company that has a small business volume, which buys a couple of licenses at full price, which has to pay for maintenance etc etc etc etc etc etc.
all, it is good to say, it is perfectly normal and legal.
Hello, mbt.
I don't like common places so much... otherwise we can always end with the "we will all die (r) ".

I bring you the example of the usual car company. . .
this car company has its own contract and in the contract has already established the various packages that its suppliers (certified) must use for the various activities (biw, mechatronics, cae, etc) and has contracted for them very similar conditions to their own.. .
Moreover, every innovation (such as the removal of the 2d in favor of the 3d annotated), the suppliers are kept well in consideration, providing free tools to see the models etc.

generically say that "the account pays the small ones with 1-2 licenses" is unfair.
It is obvious that the small ones "subscribe" the choices of the big ones (the plm system) however is the rule of the market. . .

then on the competition of the suppliers of Far East: the fact that our suite manages to intercept the parts made with illegal licenses (and we have people who collect the [bleep] around and pass them to the r&d so as to implement the countermeasures) should be a guarantee for Western "honest"s, right?
What I don't understand is why other software manufacturers don't do the same... who helps me?
I've never seen our company run against the client who has illegal parts... is simply asked "who did you do it"? and it follows who actually generated them. stop. no further break/spend.

I agree however that these agreements (such as kyoto) leave the time they find if they are not signed by everyone.
the agreement finally sanctions the fact that in the signatory countries will be implemented legislation that will cover specifically the piracy argument.
the fact that if a part "cra.kkata" is persecuted here, in India, in wool, etc... is a fact.

Bye.
 
I've never seen our company run against the client who has illegal parts... is simply asked "who did you do it"? and it follows who actually generated them. stop. no further break/spend.
the fact that "taggati" files are unmanageable from the company system, even if those tags put them outside the company, it seems to me a remarkable break/spend for the company that is totally unbearable of the stealth... .
 
the fact that "taggati" files are unmanageable from the company system, even if those tags put them outside the company, it seems to me a remarkable break/spend for the company that is totally unbearable of the stealth... .
as customers know it... should be careful in advance.
the sanatorium of the files is done in a short time (and is at the expense of those who created them).
it always worked so and customers did not complain once they understood the situation.
(and I saw at least 20 of them).
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top