• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

apple & nx

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Matrix
  • Start date Start date

The_Matrix

Guest
in case you don't know apple always uses nx for the design of its objects.
But how? do not use swx/catia/proe/alias/se/cimatron/inventor? He told me to sew!
no, sorry they use nx.
here is an interesting link:http://developer.apple.com/programs/mfi/cases.htmlin which you can see the drawings of encumbrance, quoted, of the "cases" and below to dx a beautiful "nx generated".
for older models there is even "ug generated"... that loves.
ps. Who knows why we did porting on mac...:wink:
 
The_Matrix said:
in case you don't know apple always uses nx for the design of its objects.
But how? do not use swx/catia/proe/alias/se/cimatron/inventor? He told me to sew!
no, sorry they use nx.

ps. Who knows why we did porting on mac...:wink:
Click to expand...
Well, something I had to use, I think.... .

As for porting on osx, from what I've seen, it seems to me that it's an unix version running with the x11 emulator, or is it? It is not a real integration with the apple leash.
 
in fact turns on x11, but some videos They emphasize the lack of performance loss, I mean they say it goes very well.
before porting, however, they had to use a different s.o, maybe just win no, at least one unix. :

What are you drinking?
 
cacciatorino said:
opengl? are the standard under linux, I also think about unix/bsd.

If I said a beastly thing, correct me.
Click to expand...
Yes, it uses opengl (as well as on w, anyway).
the difference compared to w is that the graphic part is emulated through a x11
 
we have made experiences with the mac,
I'd say the performance is good. ..considering also the fact that we talk about a pure 64-bit.
It is necessary to know well the compatibility with the various versions of x11 but I would say that the result is satisfactory.
I think that in February we will organize a nx seminar on mac... and maybe even on linux.
for game we also made a video that we put on youtube "nx on mac" eheh
 
Team3d said:
we have made experiences with the mac,
I'd say the performance is good. ..considering also the fact that we talk about a pure 64-bit.
Click to expand...
what advantages from compared to 64-bit windows? or does it only serve for companies that for their reasons have an infrastructure based on osx?
 
cacciatorino said:
what advantages from compared to 64-bit windows? or does it only serve for companies that for their reasons have an infrastructure based on osx?
Click to expand...
the advantages are not nx ...the software is that and there is no different version for mac. the advantages that there are the usual apple battle horses.... ignition speed. ... absence (maybe even only momentary) of viruses etc.
I was surprised to find some companies that already work with the mac and use the cad with an emulator.
realize that a company used nx with a windows emulator without knowing that the application existed on the mac.
so to the question "what do you recommend" I answer you evaluate the needs of your company.... any choice you know can be supported also by cad :finger:
 
Good morning, everyone. I'm not an expert in computer science, so be patient.
I wanted to get an idea of what mac machine it takes to make my nx run properly. I don't know apple products well, but imac 27 hit me.
What do you say?
thanks and good work.
 
Bortoluzzi Gianluigi said:
Good morning, everyone. I'm not an expert in computer science, so be patient.
I wanted to get an idea of what mac machine it takes to make my nx run properly. I don't know apple products well, but imac 27 hit me.
What do you say?
thanks and good work.
Click to expand...
Where did he hit you? Did he hurt you? :tongue:

aside.... just remember that on apple for now only turns nx and not the rich client of tc... (of tc only the web client... but it is not a great one suitable for work cad)
 
Bortoluzzi Gianluigi said:
Good morning, everyone. I'm not an expert in computer science, so be patient.
I wanted to get an idea of what mac machine it takes to make my nx run properly. I don't know apple products well, but imac 27 hit me.
What do you say?
thanks and good work.
Click to expand...
for our experience should go..... use conditional because it is all subordinate to what graphics card mounts the system.
we did some tests on an imac24 and it worked decently.
Of course everything is also depending on what kind of work you will do with nx. If you have to manage large assemblies and/or very complex parts perhaps it is better to stay on the professional lline of the apple.
 
Team3d said:
for our experience should go..... use conditional because it is all subordinate to what graphics card mounts the system.
we did some tests on an imac24 and it worked decently.
Of course everything is also depending on what kind of work you will do with nx. If you have to manage large assemblies and/or very complex parts perhaps it is better to stay on the professional lline of the apple.
Click to expand...
Mauro,
did you compare performance between an apple and a pc/windows with equal features?
 
The_Matrix said:
Mauro,
did you compare performance between an apple and a pc/windows with equal features?
Click to expand...
not yet but I will do more.... on February 17 we will organize a seminar dedicated to nx on the various platforms....so both mac and linux.

for that occasion we will do performance tests and we will openly explain the merits and defects of all solutions.
you know that you are always officially invited to our seminars:
 
Team3d said:
for our experience should go..... use conditional because it is all subordinate to what graphics card mounts the system.
we did some tests on an imac24 and it worked decently.
Of course everything is also depending on what kind of work you will do with nx. If you have to manage large assemblies and/or very complex parts perhaps it is better to stay on the professional lline of the apple.
Click to expand...
Can you give me examples of professional apple machines?
So at the moment there are no working historians with mac?
 
probably the need to use a picture, as for windows, does not apply in os x, as on wins the frame drivers go to replace the opengl engine system, which does not occur in os x, where opengl, in the unix systems, works better even if back as real.
You could verify it, it would be interesting. os x frames do not have a great advantage, as for wins, compared to gforces.

examples of apple workstations qui. use only xeon, so they are not economical in the absolute sense, but I assure you that they are equal to components with or hp, and they are built much better. There are only the amd boards, the tip boards, and a 4000 picture, but I repeat, I wait for confirmation, but I do not think there is a great advantage with the picture.
 
Team3d said:
not yet but I will do more.... on February 17 we will organize a seminar dedicated to nx on the various platforms....so both mac and linux.

for that occasion we will do performance tests and we will openly explain the merits and defects of all solutions.
you know that you are always officially invited to our seminars:
Click to expand...
Thank you!
I'll come for sure!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top