architectural pillars - roof association

[Stefano.bp]

hello to all, as I have to return a building that presented some walls tapered in top I thought to avail myself of the architectural pillars, for the particularity of these to be associated with roofs.
I have created two types, one without opening (pillars 1 and 3) another which presents an opening between the two rooms in the attic (pilastro 2), I would have these short questions in the hope that someone has the corstesia to answer me:

1) Can this way of working be corrected to resolve the situation I described?
2) how can I quote the opening (pilastro 2)with a door-type label? (It is not possible to put the doors in the pillar if I do not go wrong, it does not make me do it... )
3) I would have liked to insert a parameter of presence of the opening so that I have only one family of pillars where I could "light or turn off" the opening, but the vacuum (with which I created the opening) does not have a visibility property that is possible to assign to a si/no parameter, can you do otherwise?
4) :smile: a more soul can help me to understand why with the same association settings on the roof and the same positioning plans the pillar 1 and 3 are correctly associated with the roof while the pillar 2 is interrupted to a xxx share when associated (we will be a problem determined by opening)? ?

I attach images and families in case someone could give me an idea.
Thank you in advance.

 

[Stefano.bp]

regarding the association of the pillar number 2, in the element properties there is a value of offset height that for the other two pillars is equal to zero, and I am sure that it is responsible for the distance between pillar and roof... but it is not possible to change it also within the properties of the type, what can this value depend on? ?
Thank you. .

 

[gfrank]

if the rastramatura in top is proportional to the height of the wall, it is preferable to use the families of the walls with the extrusions (family wall), which allow the insertion of families of doors (also the only empty) with respective labels.

for question 4, in order to verify whether the problem is caused by vacuum (such as hypotizzi), do a test, removing it: if everything is "normal" you can find confirmation to your assumptions.

 

[Stefano.bp]

first of all for your time,
the advantage with the parametric architectural pillar is to decide in place width and width at the top of the wall that are parameters of instance that I attributed to the family, with wall extrusions I should apply a profile and hold that, right?

As for point 2, do you confirm that it is not possible to attribute a parameter that determines the visibility or not of the opening?

greetings and good evening.

 

[gfrank]

....
the advantage with the parametric architectural pillar is to decide in place width and width at the top of the wall that are parameters of instance that I attributed to the family, with wall extrusions I should apply a profile and hold that, right?
...

si

...
As for point 2, do you confirm that it is not possible to attribute a parameter that determines the visibility or not of the opening?
...

si

 

[Stefano.bp]

Thank you very much for the answer.
Good evening!