areas of areas that are not local

[ocraM999]

Excuse me, but how do you bring in the drawings the area of a balcony, a mezzanine, a catwalk or any paved surface?
if it is a room well bound by walls with the 'local' command is easy but in the cases above how does it do?
Mar

 

[Tristan]

local delimitation lines
http://wikihelp.autodesk.com/revit/...1-locali661/0666-contorni666/0671-linee_di671

 

[ocraM999]

Local delimitation lines...... are useful to define a place within another room..., for example for a dining area within a living room.
in the case of a balcony, a mezzanine etc.... there would be nothing to delimit, the surface is already bound (by logic) by its geometric shape.
It seems strange that revit does not allow these areas to be automatically returned,
it is not possible to think that a "evolute" program is lost if a more complex project of a cottage. there are buildings that are full of project surfaces that must not be further delimited, generally see buildings open to the public, stadiums, theatres, stations, libraries... .

What do we do, let's get rid of everything? do we associate the delimitation lines with the geometric boundary of the floors? ...... and then every time that changes the shape of a surface we have to rebuild the perimeter and try to erase the redundant 'local?
...boh! Mar

 

[Tristan]

just observations. tomorrow I call my dealer and ask him why my car does not dirt independently when I arrive near a curve...boh!

 

[gfrank]

Local delimitation lines...... are useful to define a place within another room..., for example for a dining area within a living room.
in the case of a balcony, a mezzanine etc.... there would be nothing to delimit, the surface is already bound (by logic) by its geometric shape.
It seems strange that revit does not allow these areas to be automatically returned,
it is not possible to think that a "evolute" program is lost if a more complex project of a cottage. there are buildings that are full of project surfaces that must not be further delimited, generally see buildings open to the public, stadiums, theatres, stations, libraries... .

What do we do, let's get rid of everything? do we associate the delimitation lines with the geometric boundary of the floors? ...... and then every time that changes the shape of a surface we have to rebuild the perimeter and try to erase the redundant 'local?
...boh! Mar

if you do not know, adesk has adopted the maximum of Mr. spok (startrek):" the needs of one, do not count, instead count the demands of many ...",
So you, being one, do not count ...., :biggrin: unless you have a study that buys 100 or more licenses, and then for adesk, also "... the needs of one, count ..." at the bottom, it is only "financing" the development of part of the sw that interest you (c.f.r. conceptual masses) ...

 

[Tristan]

if you do not know, adesk has adopted the maximum of Mr. spok (startrek):" the needs of one, do not count, instead count the demands of many ..."

adsk is a multinational quoted in stock that invoices 6 billion dollars! think what would happen if he listened to everyone:
keep in mind that the bees of revit (and those .nets of autocad) are open to all; do you need something special that can be useful to others? Let him do it and sell it, maybe this is the time you make the money:biggrin:

unless you have a study that buys 100 or more licenses, and then for adesk, also "... the needs of one, count ..."

I'm sorry to disappoint you gianfranco but it's not so; you should be a major account with thousands of licenses to move the elephant. You don't have 100 licenses:frown:

 

[lance]

in the case of a balcony, a mezzanine etc.... there would be nothing to delimit, the surface is already bound (by logic) by its geometric shape.

and in fact it is....

I would try to circumvent the problem in this way:

If they select a floor between his data there is the area.... separates the structural insole from the finishing surface, creates a design parameter that allows you to filter the floor abacus and you will have the surface of every single balcony and all the totals you need.
creates a floor label that reads an instance of the category of floors that you will use as a kind of code that allows you to identify the balcony to which you refer in the abacus,(if there is no create it as shared). the abaco can "enrich" with some other data provided free of charge by the "evolved" software like the type of finish used etc, which always makes cool. Imagine the abacus next to the view.

Yes, you have to use an extra piece of paper, but also make the figure of the precise and willing one:tongue:

the perfect software does not exist and will never exist, it is about finding the right compromise:.. Alternatively we can embark all on enterprise:36_1_1:

 

[ocraM999]

I'm sorry to disappoint you gianfranco but it's not so; you should be a major account with thousands of licenses to move the elephant. You don't have 100 licenses:frown:

I'm sorry, but... the need to bring back the areas of the surfaces that are not enclosed by the walls is only mine? ... or just a few?
I think it's weird. I think we'll be a few thousand.
Mar

 

[ocraM999]

and in fact it is....

I would try to circumvent the problem in this way:

If they select a floor between his data there is the area.... separates the structural insole from the finishing surface, creates a design parameter that allows you to filter the floor abacus and you will have the surface of every single balcony and all the totals you need.
creates a floor label that reads an instance of the category of floors that you will use as a kind of code that allows you to identify the balcony to which you refer in the abacus,(if there is no create it as shared). the abaco can "enrich" with some other data provided free of charge by the "evolved" software like the type of finish used etc, which always makes cool. Imagine the abacus next to the view.

Yes, you have to use an extra piece of paper, but also make the figure of the precise and willing one:tongue:

the perfect software does not exist and will never exist, it is about finding the right compromise:.. Alternatively we can embark all on enterprise:36_1_1:

very useful, thanks marco

 

[Tristan]

I'm sorry, but... the need to bring back the areas of the surfaces that are not enclosed by the walls is only mine? ... or just a few?
I think it's weird. I think we'll be a few thousand.

then you just have to gather this "some thousand" of users and make a request to the augi...

 

[ocraM999]

then you just have to gather this "some thousand" of users and make a request to the augi...

If I could do it,
Mar