arghhhh the suppressed components and its unrepressed constraints >:-(

[gingia]

as from title:
I need to suppress a component and a set and automatically suppress all the constraints connected to it and vice versa of course.
I tried to dispel the configuration options, half the internet world and still don't know if it is possible (it can't be too stupid! )
wouldn't make sense, what difference would there be if it were so with visual-hiding component?
Can anyone help me?

 

[Luca862]

I checked, it works to me like that.
if I want to suppress the constraints I have to go to suppress them manually

 

[Cast16]

What difference would there be if it were so with visual-hiding component?
Can anyone help me?

view representations control colors, position of the room, visibility, etc. and can be used to filter parts in the part list of the drawing.

level of detail representations: can be used to lighten files as they remove deleted parts from ram.

if it is possible (he can't be too stupid! )
It wouldn't make sense.

I agree that it seems a bit the same.
to create different config. as in solidworks you should use iassembly.

 

[Catafratto]

suppression of constraints can be handled with position representations.
the suppression of parts/assieme serves to "download" the aid you are working on if you are doing big stuff, like complete plants; you suppress a 10/15 online machines and work on those that remain sure that they do not move.

 

[gingia]

I confirm that inventor is a #§^? etc. etc.
and what the hell of a way to suppress a piece if you don't eliminate the constraints. practically the same thing as removing the visibility of the component.
with its "ability" to manage the constraints the suppression (with constraints ) would be useful to see what and to whom a certain piece is bound.

suppression of constraints can be handled with position representations.

you know the function and I used it often (I'm not just inventor's novellin)
I asked the question because I trusted a friend who defended a sword treats this inventor's nagware and claimed that it depended on the configuration.

the suppression of parts/assieme serves to "download" the aid you are working on if you are doing big stuff, like complete plants; you suppress a 10/15 online machines and work on those that remain sure that they do not move.

you can also get it with the visual representation.

What a mess. if I have to move a piece (it is the first example that comes to mind) on another position (momentally or not) to make some calculation of various kinds and this is bound to two or three pieces that I have to suppress...
but you were so of the autodesk where they hired the technicians of usability.... useless the sbile way to see just autocad if I had to carry it also on @#§§ of inventor.. .

I'm sorry, but... after trying "the help" that gives you solidworks... even proes is better.

 

[Catafratto]

if you load 50 pieces the representation with view is the same, if you load 5000 is not the same.
As for the fact that solidworks better manage the situation described by you I have no reason to doubt it.

 

[gingia]

if you load 50 pieces the representation with view is the same, if you load 5000 is not the same.
As for the fact that solidworks better manage the situation described by you I have no reason to doubt it.

if you load 50 pieces the representation with view is the same, if you load 5000 is not the same.
As for the fact that solidworks better manage the situation described by you I have no reason to doubt it.