assembly tools and productivity inconsistencies

[joshua]

Hello.
premise
- inv2010
- handling numerous complexes that vary each other of a few details I always found very useful the "save and replace component" command of assembly tools.

adiritttura with inv2010 I did not realize that it was taken in the menu "productivity" the same command: "Save and replace composed"

the problem is that they work differently!

with "save and replace component" I create a new detail 01a, da 01 original, and if I want to put it on the table I follow the normal procedure or shortcuts several times described. if I change it 01a This is not going to alter my old table 01with "save and replace composed" I have the new detail 02a, copiato da 02. se modifico 02a, I'm getting the table 02.
Where am I wrong? Why do they work differently?

Thank you.

j.

 

[pagnotz]

I tried to create a simple set with a part then replaced, but it behaves all normally, if I change the substitute the table of the original opens normally (which then what you mean by "beaver" I did not understand it...) and does not change as connected to the original note. . .

 

[joshua]

I tried to create a simple set with a part then replaced, but it behaves all normally, if I change the substitute the table of the original opens normally (which then what you mean by "beaver" I did not understand it...) and does not change as connected to the original note. . .

is "caster" in the sense that it is no longer connected to the original, but to the substitute, for which you have the table 01.idw con in vista 01 copy.

until I run the operation from the assembly tools menu, everything as you described me, while facondo from the productivity menu.... the hippo.

 

[davide75]

then as inv has always had these problems of table management connected to models created by the original three models you have to do so

model with table to create the model b from to with attached table.
at this point you need to temporarily rename the model a with another name and open the table b and rebuild the link with the model b in question because he will still look for the model to

 

[joshua]

then as inv has always had these problems of table management connected to models created by the original three models you have to do so

model with table to create the model b from to with attached table.
at this point you need to temporarily rename the model a with another name and open the table b and rebuild the link with the model b in question because he will still look for the model to

Okay, but that would make the application described useless, or rather, would make me lose the benefits in productivity.

however I have come to head; :finger:

the bug has only a series of totals made with an old version of inventor (6?) not in Italian.

thanks for the help provided.

j.

 

[davide75]

Well it depends.....cmq to me is comfortable when I make welds.
How'd you tell me? ? ?

 

[joshua]

Well it depends.....cmq to me is comfortable when I make welds.
How'd you tell me? ? ?

I explained badly, the command "save and replace component" works as the anologist of the application "assembly tools". I discovered that it created problems only with a series of complexes and details created with inv 6 in English:
in practice the new object created and saved went to replace also in the table of the original piece.

how much I sent the post to the forum I had not yet understood that it was a limited problem to some old files and I panicked.

Then I try to verify if migrating it solves itself, otherwise I try with a save by name... Fortunately it is only about 10 total with redundant details.

As for the table setting without having to remake the quotations every time, I act as you remembered, going to rename the native table file and replacing it with the new one.

j.