automate thread quotation

[Parametric_Ozzy]

We're 8 in the office and we all have the same problem... .
#4 seven pro x64
n°2 windowsxp 64bit
n°2 windowsxp 32bit



Okay, then it's the command we're using right now, see my attachment of 3/4 posts above.. .

yes the command you use is correct, I put a video of wf5.0 because the wf4 no longer installed it, the process is the same.
I repeat that there is a problem of incompatibility. . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvlldrkvrok&feature=youtu.be

 

[Ghery]

yes the command you use is correct, I put a video of wf5.0 because the wf4 no longer installed it, the process is the same.
I repeat that there is a problem of incompatibility. . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvlldrkvrok&feature=youtu.be

the video process is what I use... the analogue of the exhibition-cancella... the problem lies in the fact that the odds appearing are with ø :frown::frown::frown:

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

the video process is what I use... the analogue of the exhibition-cancella... the problem lies in the fact that the odds appearing are with ø :frown::frown::frown:

si l'ho capito... ma da como avete questo problema?
non credo da sempre...

 

[Ghery]

si l'ho capito... ma da como avete questo problema?
non credo da sempre...

it is not known, because until today we have always eliminated the thread from the "hole" feature to put it by hand as cosmetic and then always by hand we inserted the "m"; this because in the models 2d/3d you did not see cosmetics.
the other day I discovered that the problem was related to a wrong start-part, created 10 years ago by my colleague, and having settled the problem it is now possible to use the automatic thread of the feature hole. At this point I would like everything to be automatic and I miss "only" that letterin "m" to be affixed:wink:

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

or Mom... not comment that it is better? :smile:
remove me a curiosity, but if in the 3d model click on the hole and right click change, the metric share appears to you?
see image image

 

[Ghery]

or Mom... not comment that it is better? :smile:
remove me a curiosity, but if in the 3d model click on the hole and right click change, the metric share appears to you?
see image image
View attachment 30813

comments:biggrin:
You don't know how many gles I gave to my older colleagues, and theoretically more experienced, when I found out he's undermined that they had done in the past.

However also in model 3d I always see and only the "ø" :frown: of "m" there is no trace

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

comments:biggrin:
You don't know how many gles I gave to my older colleagues, and theoretically more experienced, when I found out he's undermined that they had done in the past.

I'd be too harsh to believe me. :wink:

However also in model 3d I always see and only the "ø" :frown: of "m" there is no trace :mad

if even in the 3d model you see only the ø there is something wrong.
if you started proes in default mode, with your start_part is just a bug of that build.
You have to do that test I told you, try installing a higher build at least the m160 and see how it behaves, do it on yours you don't have to do it to all colleagues.

 

[Ghery]

if even in the 3d model you see only the ø there is something wrong.
if you started proes in default mode, with your start_part is just a bug of that build.
You have to do that test I told you, try installing a higher build at least the m160 and see how it behaves, do it on yours you don't have to do it to all colleagues.

Then I think it is so....I launched proe without config and I created a part without using start-part, creating from scratch plans and features but that "m" does not appear exactly

as soon as possible I will try to install a higher build and see if the ark will reveal itself....

Thank you very much!!!

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

Then I think it is so....I launched proe without config and I created a part without using start-part, creating from scratch plans and features but that "m" does not appear exactly

as soon as possible I will try to install a higher build and see if the ark will reveal itself....

Thank you very much!!!

Well if it can console you (and I use pro/e for many years) this I've never heard of it, so it must be a build bug.
I recommend that you are there, if you have available install the last (m220).
Let me know. .
greetings

 

[Ghery]

Well if it can console you (and I use pro/e for many years) this I've never heard of it, so it must be a build bug.
I recommend that you are there, if you have available install the last (m220).
Let me know. .
greetings

I will feel with our ced and hope to have 220:smile:

:finger:

 

[tartufon80]

or Mom... not comment that it is better? :smile:
remove me a curiosity, but if in the 3d model click on the hole and right click change, the metric share appears to you?

Bye!

I also have the same problem but I use wf3 m250, and I think there is a limit of the version, right?

Soon we'll go to create 2.0, so I think we'll fix it, right? only one question: with the share that recovery from the exhibition/cancella is also included the thread step? I will have a different share if I use a thread m10x1 or m10x1.5?

Thank you!

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

Bye!

I also have the same problem but I use wf3 m250, and I think there is a limit of the version, right?

Soon we'll go to create 2.0, so I think we'll fix it, right? only one question: with the share that recovery from the exhibition/cancella is also included the thread step? I will have a different share if I use a thread m10x1 or m10x1.5?

Thank you!

Hello, Tartufon!
It's the same problem for you too, absolutely so that you will solve it.
no usually the step is not included in the thread as you saw in the video, only the type of thread.
If you want other directions you can put it as a annotation, then you have all the steps.

 

[tartufon80]

Hello, Tartufon!
It's the same problem for you too, absolutely so that you will solve it.
no usually the step is not included in the thread as you saw in the video, only the type of thread.
If you want other directions you can put it as a annotation, then you have all the steps.

Hello, Ozzy! :smile:

and then it will work out, I don't know if at the end of the month, or more in there, but the version/name change is expected, so we pass from "design" to "create"!!! :biggrin:
Besides, we will also update the pdm to the next version, the 10 I think I understand, but I am a miserable "PC-dotato book", outside the "political" games, and so I wait eager to start comparing with my new "zappa"!!!
sin for step, it would have been really comfortable.

Thank you and soon! !

Take care! :wink:

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

Hello, Ozzy! :smile:

and then it will work out, I don't know if at the end of the month, or more in there, but the version/name change is expected, so we pass from "design" to "create"!!! :biggrin:
Besides, we will also update the pdm to the next version, the 10 I think I understand, but I am a miserable "PC-dotato book", outside the "political" games, and so I wait eager to start comparing with my new "zappa"!!!
sin for step, it would have been really comfortable.

Thank you and soon! !

Take care! :wink:

probably you will pass to pdmlink 10.1, another beautiful "pass" much more look & feel and 9.1.
for the matter of the step, it can be convenient how to serve little.. the quota of the preforum is clearly updated always according to the step you choose, but depends as they are used in the workshop, many companies have standardized parameters and do not use different steps, so neither do they indicate them at the table, but if you want them as said just put the note.

 

[tartufon80]

probably you will pass to pdmlink 10.1, another beautiful "pass" much more look & feel and 9.1.
for the matter of the step, it can be convenient how to serve little.. the quota of the preforum is clearly updated always according to the step you choose, but depends as they are used in the workshop, many companies have standardized parameters and do not use different steps, so neither do they indicate them at the table, but if you want them as said just put the note.

well then, it will mean that it will be even more intuitive, even if with 9.1 I don't feel bad (I even became fond of proe 2001, with its beautiful curtains, which made you forget nothing....vabbé, too many emotions... :biggrin.

for the step, in our workshop it is convenient, especially because we often find ourselves drawing and producing parts of machinery, or components that couple with commercial components, and there we are not free to choose which step to use....but I will adapt some macro realized for wf3, and go with the notes... :finger: