automatic design types cords / beams

[Zoro76]

Good day to all
I'd need help solving a problem.
the topic I want to talk about is the perimeter ropes/trays in a c.a. structure.
I kindly ask if someone has the opportunity to help me develop a lisp that can help me in this job. Unfortunately I have no knowledge about it and therefore I trust experts.
I try to explain what I need.

the most I managed to do was to create a dynamic block with attributes to define the types of strings. in this block I wonder in sequence these things:
- Like rope? where I go to insert the progressive number
- the quantity of upper braces
- the diameter of the upper braces
- the amount of the lower braces
- the diameter of the lower braces
in the drawing that I attached are unfortunately drawn only 2 lower and upper braces at the corners of the bracket. what I would like to do is: according to the data of the attribute inserted, to draw the reggistaffa in the bracket. graphically the diameters are not necessary and neither the distance between “the balls” should not necessarily have a precise step; the important thing is that they are equally detached.
Then, on the plant, I need to associate the block “type 1” to the lines that “will be” automatically drawn with a lisp :biggrin:.
As for this second part, I reported in the attached drawing an example of how they should be drawn. from the edge of the structure I have to make an offset of 2,5 or 3 cm and from this line an additional offset according to the chosen cord. for example if the type 1 cord is 20 cm wide then the second offset will be 20cm; if the type 2 cord is 30cm wide then the second offset will be 30cm.
doing this will then (always via lisp) the possibility to add a sort of distinct or perhaps adding a textm in the block, so as to account the lengths of the drawn cords.

I tried to explain the best possible. If there is something that is not clear I kindly ask you to let me know.

in the meantime thank you all
♪View attachment Cordolo.dwg

 

[Zoro76]

Hello, everyone.
Is there anyone who can help me?
Maybe I asked something too particular?

Hi.

 

[Tristan]

I kindly ask if someone has the opportunity to help me develop a lisp that can help me in this job. Unfortunately I have no knowledge about it and therefore I trust experts.

in practice you are asking some good soul to work for you... I understand why no one answered you

 

[Zoro76]

in practice you are asking some good soul to work for you... I understand why no one answered you

more than anything else I hope someone knows what I'm talking about and maybe they already have something similar to what I ask ready in the drawer

 

[GP.]

instead of doing it with a lisp, can't you create everything in the block and then manage the visibility states?

curiosity, is it right to call "reggistaffe" also the longitudinal armor?

 

[Cristallo]

curiosity, is it right to call "reggistaffe" also the longitudinal armor?

Actually, looking at the dwg, there's not even a "reggistaffe."
for my small experience, a brace is a bar (usually of a diameter much smaller than the longitudinal armor) which has the exclusive function of regulating the bracket in its place. classic example is the armor itself a section with 4 arms brackets, where you need 2 bars in central position exclusively to fix the brackets.
in terms of "theores" in the overall resistance of the c.a. section, the brat is there or there is no makes almost no difference.
here if I remove (in the best case) 2ø12 from the total of 6ø12 I get a lowering of the armor of 33%...

 

[XANADU65]

Hi.
Also for my small experience in this matter I can say and I believe to interpret "reggistaffe" as longitudinal irons ....while I believe that crystal means something like that...(that "s" that unites the two longitudinal needles to allow only the anchoring of the bracket and whose influence at the calculation level is not influential)....I hope to have been clear

 

[XANADU65]

and cmq for experience of some day in the yard ... the carpenters use the classic "fil di ferro" to hook the brackets to the longitudinal and/or transversal.... the braces intended as the picture previously inserted are used for great works of carpentry. Not for beams and cords. . .

 

[Cristallo]

c...while I believe that crystal means such a thing...(that "s" that unites the two longitudinal needles to allow only the anchoring of the bracket and whose influence at the calculation level is not influential)

No xanadu. those wreaths you have indicated, are called colloquially "binding rods" and have the main function of adjoining the armor bars and are used exclusively in confined walls and sects, sometimes in the pillars. for legislation, in a section of c.a. half of the bars must be confined. in the beams this confinement is done with the brackets, for this reason there are brackets to 4, 6 and sometimes even more arms. in the walls the effort that has to endure the bracket is reduced compared to the beam and the tirantines are adopted, also because for a 20m long wall with blanda armor (say a ø14/20?) , I want to see to put horizontal brackets every 40cm in length and 20cm in height. .

..the carpenters use the classic "iron fil" to hook the brackets to longitudinal and/or transversal.... the braces intended as the image inserted previously are used for large carpentry works. Not for beams and cords. . .

the carpenter uses the iron fil to block the bracket in the jet phase.
If you miss to tie with iron fil 2 points on a bracket I director of the works look at you and nothing happens.
If you miss inserting two reggistaffes, I'll look at you and I'll pull you out of the yard, reserve to report you.
Maybe the objects aren't exactly the same...
I attach an image to exemplify what you mean by braces.
that then in the cords the upper armor assumes more a function of brace than section armor is another pair of sleeves, but it is done for operational convenience, not by function.

 

[XANADU65]

Okay, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, . .

 

[Zoro76]

Thank you all for participating in the post.
I'll get to work on the suggestion of gp.