(autosez 2) soil sections and profiles - automatic extraction

[GP.]

version 2 of autosez.

for changes and new features see the "new" section in the help (autosez_2.chm attached file), several were dictated by requests and suggestions formulated in the vecchio thread.

Since the code has been almost completely rewritten, I invite users to report any strange things, in case it would be appropriate to attach a portion of dwg and the autosez_2.dat file

input data:
- model - spline2d and poly2d (also adapted/wooden)
- model - dtm to 3dfaces
- model - lines and 3dpoly
- poly3d profile on the model
- poly2d profile on the floor

output:
- 3dpoly profile on the model
- poly2d profile on the floor
- listed cartilage

utility:
- completion and modification
- various topographic use

for use add the autosez_2 folder to the autocad path (options\file).


a thanks for the help to marc'antonio alessi, paolo born and angel stocco, as well as don plannerroad for spiritual comfort.
.

 

[antoniman]

un grand lisp :biggrin::biggrin::finger:

 

[Ing.Carus]

hello and congratulations for this beautiful and very useful application.
I just wanted to ask if there's the way you don't always have to use the appload command every time I have the nerve to use asez as below:

appload command, imposed as file type "executable visual lisp (*.vlx)", search and select autosez.vlx, click on "load" and then on "close"

by command I typed: ♪

thanks and congratulations again!!! !

 

[PlannerRoad]

hello and congratulations for this beautiful and very useful application.
I just wanted to ask if there's the way you don't always have to use the appload command every time I have the nerve to use asez as below:

appload command, imposed as file type "executable visual lisp (*.vlx)", search and select autosez.vlx, click on "load" and then on "close"

by command I typed: ♪

thanks and congratulations again!!! !

appload command, find "start group" in the mask, there in "content" add the file autosez_2.vlx

 

[Ing.Carus]

perfect made..... everything ok!!!thanks

 

[GP.]

....comando appload, imposed as file type "executable visual lisp (*.vlx)", search and select car sez. vlx, I click on "load" and then on "close"

by command I typed: Asezthanks and congratulations again!!! !

Thanks, but I think you're using the old version of the lisp, with the new one, attached in the first post of this discussion, you have to upload autosez_2.vlx (as Plannerroad already told you) and launch with as :smile:

 

[Ing.Carus]

was just to specify the procedure......I was talking about asez_2!all ok and thanks!:finger:

 

[BleEzE]

Hello everyone...before all compliments for the lisp is fantastic ...but there is only one thing I did not understand...if I have a polyline 2d or 3d (nonline) on level curves what should I use to extrapolate the data?? ? ?

 

[GP.]

hi, with autosez it is necessary to select a line (or 2 points) to define the section to calculate, while you have the need to select a polyline, possibility that I think will be previewed in a possible new version of the lisp.

to "take me forward with work" I see to put down something, between today and tomorrow, that still allows you to solve.

 

[liber]

There was something from sepram, but it wasn't the optimum, when it served I used a demo of delicad - flashmnt 5.0 -projection of 2d entities on a mntOf course I have used the approximately 12 possibilities provided for in the demo :biggrin:

 

[BleEzE]

thank you gp...if you can do something you do me a great pleasure...cmq the main thing and that read also the bows...thanks in advance

 

[GP.]

This lisp calculates the 2d profile that corresponds to the projection of a polylinea on level curves consisting of polylinee or spline.

After the appropriate tests (clearly not yet done, I hope there are no problems) is destined to be part of the autosez package and will automatically create the cartilage.

for the moment you can complete it with "data extraction\profile\poliline 2d on the floor", setting the right "first step" e idonea "reference share".

the design direction of the profile is influenced by the position of the selection point, the distance between the vertices takes into account the possible curvature of the tracked polyline.

@bleezeIf you have problems on your model, try to move it near the origin of the bird, exaggerated distances as in your case can give problems, even with normal autocad functions.
also take a look at the track, which in some curves passes where they were interrupted for the positioning of the texts of the quotas.
ocio that you also have 3dpoly with vertices not at the same altitude, these will be clearly discarded by the procedure.

.

 

[BleEzE]

Excuse me if I answer you so late...cmq you were very kind lsp is perfect
Thank you.

 

[ricciopasticcio]

Good morning.

 

[p@po]

first of all thanks for the utility that these days I am a little studying.
at the moment I wanted to do only these domand3:

1) is it normal for me to disable all settings of the object snap after using as?

2) for what I read

set the profile representation and cartiglio scales.
the reference scale for the plotting is the x scale.

but why does the scale change me only the size of the text in the cartilage while the dimesion of the section remains unchanged?

 

[p@po]

other thing:

I have this level curved floor with a yellow rectangle in the center representing the excavation area.
Now,
I design the lines that represent those that will be the lines of section for me. I open up and select the line, for example the first left and tell him to profile me at a quota of 97.
here the first swallow:
It tells me that quota 97 is higher than the minimum quota (96) that the lisp does not understand that that is a reporto zone and not digging.

can you overcome this limitation?

 

[GP.]

from holy to martyr... :biggrin:

1) is it normal for me to disable all settings of the object snap after using as?

absolutely not, the lisp restores them at the end, "a distance" I don't know.

but why does the scale change me only the size of the text in the cartilage while the dimesion of the section remains unchanged?

when you have to plot not resize the section, but impose the desired plotting scale, the height of the texts instead is set according to the scale "x" typed in autosez. if 1:200 scale molds the texts will have (they should) have different height from the 1:1000 scale print

I'm telling him to give me a profile at 97.
here the first swallow:
It tells me that quota 97 is higher than the minimum quota (96) that the lisp does not understand that that is a reporto zone and not digging.

can you overcome this limitation?

the lisp is not telepathic, it understands what you make him select, if you impose reference quota 97 and then the section line intercepts a line at quota 96... , this "Imitation" serves not to draw the profile in the middle of the paper.


:smile:

 

[p@po]

the lisp is not telepathic, it understands what you make him select, if you impose reference quota 97 and then the section line intercepts a line at quota 96... , this "Imitation" serves not to draw the profile in the middle of the paper.
:smile:

but it is a pity because I personally find it important to estimate the excavation areas with those of carry back from the sections.
Unfortunately, sections of only excavation are somewhat restrictive.
Since you are so practical, could you make a change to this? ?
Is it possible?
:smile:

 

[GP.]

I can't understand why you're talking about "sections of only excavation", the lisp is made to calculate the sections of the model you propose.

if you're looking for a software that can do it, see if This is It can be your case.

:smile:

 

[p@po]

I can't understand why you're talking about "sections of only excavation", the lisp is made to calculate the sections of the model you propose.

if you're looking for a software that can do it, see if This is It can be your case.

:smile:

but in fact I asked you if you could retouch it in such a way that when the digging quota is greater than the least he does not return that error but completes the cartilage marking a horizontal line that is the reference quota and more under the course of the ground below the reference.
at the end from the "logical" point of view it is raged to keep the profile of the soil maintaining the reference quota, that is as I bring you back in the attached design.
then for charity, not within the merit of the complexity of realization of this modification but to the eye what you have already created seems abundantly adaptable.
Then I'll be wrong.