• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

background color in the drafting environment

  • Thread starter Thread starter filippo73
  • Start date Start date

filippo73

Guest
good evening to all users.
I have a problem with the drafting environment today. in switching from model 3d to table 2d the background in the work views appears dark blue. if instead I open other catdrawing files that were created until yesterday they open regularly with the white background. I couldn't figure out what setting this problem could create.
Can someone give me some advice on how to restore the white background?
 
Hi.
Have you changed the settings > tools > options > drafting ec.? ? ?
Can you restore casettings from another machine or backup?
 
Thank you very much for the answer. I realized that it is a setting on which I cannot intervene and that it concerns only the standards "3d" so asme, iso and jis, in all 5 standards. we say that in the end it is not a huge problem, I can "add" it, because on others the sheet is white. in fact the previous drawings I had created them all according to the iso. rather now I have another problem on the "functional tolerancing and annotation" module that I don't know why it is set on asmes, although on the options the tolerances are on iso. Therefore when I go to put on sheet (with standard iso) the listed 3d model, the program tells me that the operation can not be performed as the quotation on the 3d was made with different standards.
 
In fact now you have to align the standards. or one or another.
If I'm not mistaken by setting another standard in 3d, for example by taking the same of your cards, you have to requote the 3d from scratch. But I'm not 100% sure.

rather I have a question: quotating the piece in 3d, you are implementing the philosophy of 3d master.
Are you working this way for a single project, by habit, comfort or anything?
 
Yes, of course you need to use the same standard in both modules, on the fact that in 3d you have to requote from zero I don't know, I have to try.
As for the ft&a module, we say that I just started using it, for now only for "didactic" purposes, I am therefore beginning to take confidence. But I have to say that from a conceptual point of view I really like it, because you do all the quotation, with dimensional and geometric tolerances, and then when you make the table the drawing is practically ready and quoted. you just have to choose the views you want to transport from 3d to 2d. I just hope to figure out how to bring everything to standard iso also because with these settings it gives me the odds in inches and every time I have to change them by hand bringing them in mm.
 
the beautiful of the 3d master is that there is some logic with the fta module in the sense that you can not put illogical geometric tloerances. the system recognizes it.

nice drafting instead manually you can do what you want
 
I think I fixed the inch quota problem in ft&a, hopefully well and thank you.
It is true, in ft&a with the advisor tolerancing you are prevented from quotations, so you have the certainty that things are done well, while in the drafting module when you report directly there, you have the freedom to put what you want, but no guarantee that the rules are respected.
 
Now the other question I have is:
who can do the job you're doing in 3d?

the vast majority of companies are not ready for the 3d master. they want again and alas only 2d designs. for convenience or other.

so you are pushing yourself beyond technology but if the company that receives your files is not equipped or we say compatible with the 3d master, your effort will remain in vain. It will have been your personal effort.

However, congratulations on your approach.

I have done a project in firm > study of the feasibility of the introduction of 3d master.
account: for our feasible sector even if there are bugs and improvements. apart from the technical aspect it is necessary to specify that the 3d master is above all a change of philosophy within the company, and that it must be supported 100% from the direction otherwise you will come across many but many walls.

What do you think?
 
Meanwhile I thank you for your point of view, what you write is interesting. What I hope is that someone can be useful, but knowing how to do something more could be an advantage and if you open me some opportunities. And then I have to say that I'm interested in it, I'd like to master it well.
To answer your question however, from my point of view this approach seems to me "more logical", pass me the expression, and also once you extract the 2d we say that you find the job practically already done.
 
it is the great advantage but obliges the company to a great change.
attention: you are creating quotas and annotations directly in the 3d with the expensive fta license.

The technician in the technical office could make you notice that everything you do he can do in the drafting business environment without buying a new (costosa) license.

the 3d master means switching from paper to 3d files that contain all but just all the information.
in the workshop then it would pass from the screens sign holders (touch screen ?) with software compatible to open files step (?) ... I would also say smart.

the advantage is that you no longer have the designs to update after modifications because everything happens in 3d.
the role of the designer would disappear to leave space to the manufacturer (one man show :) .

Here is the core of the matter.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 0 (members: 0, guests: 0)
Back
Top